- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:04 pm to CorchJay
quote:
You should have went and won yourself $5 million. I don't think you are gaining any traction in this thread.
i'm not going to try and prove a negative. it's impossible.
quote:
apply you a little faith in the numbers being true
what about this presentation struck you as extremely credible?
quote:
And from my understanding the actually data is being presented to the hackers/IT experts there.
no, they've received something from the new stuff they showed earlier today. the packets promised from absolute proof haven't been provided. these data models also aren't available. Seth K's is verifiable, but it is just a jumping off point for anomalies not evidence of a crime.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:05 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
i'd like to hear him dispute and update on the points in this article as well as yes i want him to show his work.
frick him. I'd like all of them to just leave.
We need to investigate how that county had a 90.8% turnout and such a large majority of voters voting by mail.
The precincts with the lowest turnout were 69 and 75%, with most precints around that 90% range.
Is this fricking county 98% old white ladies or something?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eDdWLf0mUKPIhxZAnmpCH6jed0XvPazX/view
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:05 pm to oklahogjr
I have no idea. The guy you posted got his data from a chinese backed company in madrid.
And he didnt answer that persons question. Just logged off to never return.
I think your guy is full of shite.
And he didnt answer that persons question. Just logged off to never return.
I think your guy is full of shite.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:05 pm to ShinerHorns
quote:
So you’re calling Trump a liar now?
Now, sure. plenty of times in the past too.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:05 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
getting in front of a camera definitely doesn't mean you're more trustworthy.
then why do you trust articles, news reports, msnbc, cnn, fox or anyone else that says no fraud. You don't see the data for that either. Even when trying to "double check" the results people have thrown fits broken laws just to keep from doing canvass.
You know fraud happened. I know fraud happened. the entire country and the world knows this was a stolen election so why sit here and have pissing contest until the end of the symposium
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:09 pm to CorchJay
quote:
then why do you trust articles, news reports, msnbc, cnn, fox or anyone else that says no fraud.
I don't. I came here to get the hard data indisputable proof that was promised. gotta diversify all my sources. i spend very little time on traditional media though.
But i'm here, show me the goods man. i've asked others here to help walkthrough the math in detail to explain all this but they weren't interested apparently or are pulling up their example excels where they checked it too.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:11 pm to CorchJay
How tf did one of the data guys use the wrong data when it's so easy to get and verify?
And nobody caught it?
Thays some mickey mouse shite right there.
And nobody caught it?
Thays some mickey mouse shite right there.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:12 pm to oklahogjr
Then why bitch and complain before the completion of the event. It's just 3 days. The presentation isn't just for tech folks, but politicians, news folks, regular citizens. If you just threw data packets on machines in a room there wouldn't be much to talk about. So calm down an see what the results are at the conclusion
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:15 pm to CorchJay
quote:
Then why bitch and complain before the completion of the event. It's just 3 days. The presentation isn't just for tech folks, but politicians, news folks, regular citizens. If you just threw data packets on machines in a room there wouldn't be much to talk about. So calm down an see what the results are at the conclusion
i'm just giving updates for my poliboard fans. once they confirm the fraud and unveil the 100% absolute proof they're gonna want to see me get redpilled at this point.
Also you should consider they need to release the data early so the guys can work with it. It's not like they can hand it to them with an hour before the conference is over and they can verify anything.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:19 pm to oklahogjr
Bigggest update of the conference: despite many on here's claim they managed to fit 4 numbers and the paint art state graphic on the screen at the same time.
still no summary numbers but they've atleast got them written. presentation is getting better, they'll be prepared by tomorrow at this rate.
still no summary numbers but they've atleast got them written. presentation is getting better, they'll be prepared by tomorrow at this rate.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:20 pm to oklahogjr
Lindell stated over an hour ago that the cyber rooms have the data.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:25 pm to CorchJay
quote:
Lindell stated over an hour ago that the cyber rooms have the data.
they've disputed that on twitter already. i mentioned he was lying when he said it even.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:28 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
they've disputed that on twitter already. i mentioned he was lying when he said it even.
Clarification:
They have been given a metric shite ton of data to analyze, but not the original packet captures. I’m thinking Lindell holds this until tomorrow.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:29 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
They have been given a metric shite ton of data to analyze, but not the original packet captures. I’m thinking Lindell holds this until tomorrow.
I feel like he did say tomorrow on the packets at one point but definitely moved on quick.
this is a good concise summary though
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:30 pm to oklahogjr
he stated it on the war room. I don't use twitter so I don't give a crap what people say on there.
I mean really why does Lindell need to lie? Hoodwinked and so deep in he has to?
You do realize nothing at all will happen unless this gets enough traction to get to the USSC and have standing. So either he has the data or not. Seems you're not being open minded at all about what's going on. And definitely doesn't seem you have any technical skills because you don't determine the outcome before having all the details. And obviously you aren't there to know either way.
I mean really why does Lindell need to lie? Hoodwinked and so deep in he has to?
You do realize nothing at all will happen unless this gets enough traction to get to the USSC and have standing. So either he has the data or not. Seems you're not being open minded at all about what's going on. And definitely doesn't seem you have any technical skills because you don't determine the outcome before having all the details. And obviously you aren't there to know either way.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:31 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I feel like he did say tomorrow on the packets at one point but definitely moved on quick. this is a good concise summary though
I’m in agreement that he should release these if he wants this to be a success.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:33 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
they've disputed that on twitter already. i mentioned he was lying when he said it even
On fricking Twatter? So now Twatter is the bastion of truth?
WTF kind of wierd world do you live in?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 7:33 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
quote:
You should have went and won yourself $5 million. I don't think you are gaining any traction in this thread.
i'm not going to try and prove a negative. it's impossible.
Comm Port man still at it.
You were not going there to win 5 million because you like with this, you didn't even know that an Ethernet Port is a Comm Port.
Popular
Back to top


1





