- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Pillow Guy Symposium: only flat-earthers remain excited
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:47 pm to Nephropidae
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:47 pm to Nephropidae
The only person talking Q is you.
If you can't defend or explain what we are watching, the next step is to attack the people.
You know that is very classic Stalin/Lenin right? Lot's of NAZI in that too.
If you can't defend or explain what we are watching, the next step is to attack the people.
You know that is very classic Stalin/Lenin right? Lot's of NAZI in that too.
0
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:49 pm to Poohbear8487
quote:
What’s giving you pause? I’m biased because I’ve been following his stuff for a few weeks.
so none of this is really a definitive smoking gun. he's a far far far better presenter of numbers and understands them better than anyone else that's talked so far.
It's hey this looks weird. think of it like if these were stats around a rival SEC football team.
this same type of stuff used as evidence though when trolls hit the SEC rant with the annual Auburn is #1 because of whatever statistic or fact thing from week 1 and 2.
also you should consider election sample sizes.
there have only been 59 presidential elections in the US ever. so something happening for a first time or finding out things did or didn't correlate in a specific year of data isn't really air tight evidence of anything. we just don't have a ton of presidential election data.
I do agree he presented facts and it does seem like this was a very strange election cycle compared to the norm so far but with a sample size of 59.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:49 pm to Nephropidae
quote:
Nephropidae
Qbsessed
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:51 pm to xGeauxLSUx
UNFORTUNATELY I have been busy today and only caught about 10 minutes. They said the next 4 hours were devoted to the mesa county thing.
Took one hour
We live in 3rd world country, unless the people join together the country will be forever lost
Took one hour
We live in 3rd world country, unless the people join together the country will be forever lost
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:55 pm to ksayetiger
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:55 pm to Nephropidae
quote:
Is this the new Q thread. Cuz I think this is the new Q thread.
Well that is what you get for thinking when you lack the adequate tools to do so. It tends to cause one to make a fool of one's self
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:57 pm to VoxDawg
New info on the packet captures. Fact checkers are reviewing the “new” packets. There seems to be an issue with the “old” ones. That is why Lindel said Biden’s total of 68 million is off. Of course, the fact checkers are bitching about the change.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 5:58 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
New info on the packet captures. Fact checkers are reviewing the “new” packets. There seems to be an issue with the “old” ones. That is why Lindel said Biden’s total of 68 million is off. Of course, the fact checkers are bitching about the change.
what are the "new" packets?
what happened to the old ones? for that matter what were the old packets data of?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:03 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
what are the "new" packets? what happened to the old ones? for that matter what were the old packets data of?
No idea, but I guess the old ones were reformatted and adjusted.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:06 pm to YankeeBama
Now this may get interesting. she's apparently gotten an algorithim to confirm Franks. i'm hoping one or both will publish it and their analysis together so it can be reviewed.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:07 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
New info on the packet captures. Fact checkers are reviewing the “new” packets. There seems to be an issue with the “old” ones. That is why Lindel said Biden’s total of 68 million is off. Of course, the fact checkers are bitching about the change.
Correction:
The fact checkers were given the new data from the Messa forensic image, not a packet from the data in Absolute Proof
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:08 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
Correction:
The fact checkers were given the new data from the Messa forensic image, not a packet from the data in Absolute Proof
awesome. that should get some info out there one way or another.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:12 pm to oklahogjr
This tech woman is saying FL going to Trump is what started the tabulation shutdowns in swing states? Makes sense.
I always believed the massive in person voting for Trump was not expected by the election riggers……and what happened?
SHUT IT DOWN!! WE NEED SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THE ALGORITHMS!
I always believed the massive in person voting for Trump was not expected by the election riggers……and what happened?
SHUT IT DOWN!! WE NEED SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THE ALGORITHMS!
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:15 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Correction:
The fact checkers were given the new data from the Messa forensic image, not a packet from the data in Absolute Proof
awesome. that should get some info out there one way or another.
Watch it Okie, you came to have some fun at the expense of the Pillow Man and you’re in danger of being “red pilled” …..lol!
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:18 pm to Bass Tiger
oh no, so far it's all fun. she even just contradicted the doctor right there.
Franks said all 50 states no problem with his algorithim.
and then she comes in does 30 states and already has a couple that don't work.
Franks said all 50 states no problem with his algorithim.
and then she comes in does 30 states and already has a couple that don't work.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:20 pm to oklahogjr
I will say though, this is the chance to red pill me. if they actually release all this info for us to explore and understand and it checks out. that would be a big deal. but i'm gonna want the details they promised and details around any claims before jumping on the crazy train though.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:21 pm to oklahogjr
The guy that was just talking could be the “Aliens” meme guy’s brother
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:21 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
oh no, so far it's all fun. she even just contradicted the doctor right there.
Franks said all 50 states no problem with his algorithim.
and then she comes in does 30 states and already has a couple that don't work
So you have some questions? Maybe there’s a possibility some shenanigans did occur on election night?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:22 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I will say though, this is the chance to red pill me.
Whatever, you’re a full on Biden kum guzzler. You’re not fooling anybody here.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 6:27 pm to oklahogjr
A couple out of 30...so it must be bunk. Only 28 out of 30 states had the identical most bizarre voting ratio anomaly in history, but since she says it doesn't work in two, you throw it out. So, lets assume the exact same percentage of 18, 19, 20, 21, through 99 year olds voted in ever precinct. Frankly, even if one state ended up like that....something is f'd up. But....if Frank is going to be debunked, they are going to have to show that his numbers are wrong....in every state. (I'm glad they are trying to do that...if they can, then we know. If they can't, then we likewise know.) Now, whether anybody will pay attention or care, well, that is the real issue.
Page 78 of 106
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News