- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Pillow Guy Symposium: only flat-earthers remain excited
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:38 pm to MightyYat
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:38 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Lindell had guys working with him way before election night. It's why he was visiting Trump immediately after the election. They knew.
I work in information systems. This concerns me more than anything what exactly was being monitored and what packets did they collect for the data set. It's not like they sent raw data over the wires. They would have had to call system commands of some kind that made database changes.
How and where did they break into all 50 states to even monitor this?
4
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:39 pm to Ted2010
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:40 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
What is mathematically impossible exactly.
Who said 'mathematically impossible' ?? I heard some talk earlier about statistical impossibility where duplication of projection data by a supposed actual set of voting would be a statistical impossibility when duplicated across multiple precincts.
And 'impossible' in a layman setting such as this really means statistically improbable.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:42 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Who said 'mathematically impossible' ?? I heard some talk earlier about statistical impossibility where duplication of projection data by a supposed actual set of voting would be a statistical impossibility when duplicated across multiple precincts.
And 'impossible' in a layman setting such as this really means statistically improbable.
The guy i quoted synopsis did. Sounds like it's just more of the same data analysis stuff.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:42 pm to Ted2010
quote:
Cliffs? Anything other than speculation and conjecture?
Our elections are not secure. So you need to start here with this simple fact before going forward.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:43 pm to dgnx6
Big news at 7:00 PM CST
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:43 pm to Ted2010
quote:
Anything other than speculation and conjecture?
To you? I going by your posts. Most likely not.
quote:
Cliffs?
Sure.
- Each state had what Dr Frank calls a key.
- The key turns out to be the same for each county of that state.
- The key for PA does not work for Ohio. But the Ohio key works in every county in that state.
- That held true in all 50 states.
So what's the key. The US Census. The key is made up of 83 numbers. Each number is each age. Meaning, 18, 19 , 20, 21...etc...
The fact that county where Birmingham should not match Fayette, Al. The demo is different. So how is it that the key is exactly the same?
He explains it here: ANd in every state, 1 key and one key alone works. And it works at every county level
LINK
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:44 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
How and where did they break into all 50 states to even monitor this?
I didn’t get to listen to any of it so this may be from completely left field, but election night team Trump/Lindell were still the government, so not sure if “breaking into” is exactly the right way to categorize it if they were in fact monitoring the proceedings.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:44 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I work in information systems. This concerns me more than anything what exactly was being monitored and what packets did they collect for the data set.
Keep us up to date. I am an aerospace engineer but a very old one. The Information Age has passed me by - Was on my second career when the innerwebs was invented. All these interface protocols are a lost art to me. Back in my day, you did everything one wire at a time.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:45 pm to DingLeeBerry
quote:
I didn’t get to listen to any of it so this may be from completely left field, but election night team Trump/Lindell were still the government, so not sure if “breaking into” is exactly the right way to categorize it if they were in fact monitoring the proceedings.
Elections are run by the state government. They could grant access but unless all the states knew about it the only way to do that would be to break in that i know of.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:47 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Elections are run by the state government. They could grant access but unless all the states knew about it the only way to do that would be to break in that i know of.
So if a foreign adversary were suspected of attacking the US via election tampering, you’d consider it up to each state to mount that defense? Trump and Pompeo were pumping out all sorts of stuff related China and also election tampering leading up to the election, which struck many as interesting at the time.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:50 pm to oklahogjr
If your not interested in watching are you really interested?
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:50 pm to TheBoo
quote:
I agree and I'm also curious. I don't think the algorithm he was showing is what moved the votes, I think the actual packets of data they claim to have captures show the vote switches. I think that's what they've been saying all along that they have proof of actual votes being switched from Trump to Biden.
We shall see I guess..
I think that the KEY is what was the predetermined amount per age that would need to be switched and was available.
And that key siphoned votes from every county.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:52 pm to DingLeeBerry
quote:
So if a foreign adversary were suspected of attacking the US via election tampering, you’d consider it up to each state to mount that defense?
Like I said they could ask for help but these are all state run elections.
I sincerely doubt they gave unrestricted access to either candidate during the election to be honest.
They may have had security monitoring but again those are the state and county security guys. I know for a fact Maricopa county for example handled their election security in house with a security NOC war room monitoring for anything happening on the networks.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:53 pm to BillRose
quote:
your not interested in watching are you really interested
I don't need 3 days of bullshite. I want the data, and to understand what the data is. Then based on that their analysis may or may not be meaningful.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:53 pm to GodnCountry
Showing they did it in 2018
Election supervisor showed she could just vote for who she wanted during the adjudication.
Election supervisor showed she could just vote for who she wanted during the adjudication.
This post was edited on 8/10/21 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:55 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I want the data, and to understand what the data is.
Lol no you don't
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:56 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Lol no you don't
I could give a shite who actually won the election. This country was fricked either way. Our political climate is a toxic mess. What I would like to know though is if they found something meaningful here or it's more of the same.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:57 pm to oklahogjr
Packet captures were presented to Lindell on the 9th of January. Who supplied them? I don’t know.
I believe the source of the data the packet capture details was from Chinese equipment.
I believe the source of the data the packet capture details was from Chinese equipment.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 4:58 pm to GodnCountry
quote:
GodnCountry
Thank you
Page 29 of 106
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News