- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/16/17 at 6:50 am to UHTiger
quote:I agree that it is a huge jump to "Clintons did it", but it is shady as hell.
I have yet to see anyone deny he was murdered. It's the huge leap the rapid Trumptards take to insist the clintons were involved.
The timing, the person murdered, the political aspects surrounding it.
It stinks to high heaven and I think it is a huge disservice to our society to just disregard the idea that it was a political murder.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 6:53 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
Failed robberies happen literally every day. It is completely unremarkable that Rich may have panicked (or the thug may have panicked), shot him, and then run off.
That's our story, and we're sticking with it.
Signed,
The Clinton Campaign
Posted on 5/16/17 at 6:57 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
Computer hacks happen literally every day. It is completely unremarkable that foreign actors may have hacked and released DNC information (with no contact at all to Trump), gave it to Wikileaks, and then disappeared.
FIFY
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:12 am to UHTiger
quote:
I have yet to see anyone deny he was murdered. It's the huge leap the rapid Trumptards take to insist the clintons were involved.
The Clinton'a and Obama were involved. No way they discovered Seth w/o the help of the Obama political espionage team. AKA our intel community. It all makes sense now. Why else would the DNC and HRC not allow the FBI to help her after she was supposedly hacked? She was hacked three months of Sunday's by everyone and their mother overseas. (She sent classified info on her phone overseas) As well as easy peasy hacks because Podesta is an idiot with phishing and his I<3Hillary password.
But it is so much easier to just blame it all on the Russians; and have Obama order our IC to put Russian handprints on all of it.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:13 am to TrueTiger
So this board's official position is that it is totally improbable for a robbery by a random thug to go wrong and someone to wind up dead?
Despite the fact that shite happens pretty fricking often in both NOLA and BR?
I'm not saying anything definitive about either situation. I would just like some affirmative proof of either either theory, not a bunch of conjecture and general theorycrafting about muh Russians or muh Clintons.
Despite the fact that shite happens pretty fricking often in both NOLA and BR?
I'm not saying anything definitive about either situation. I would just like some affirmative proof of either either theory, not a bunch of conjecture and general theorycrafting about muh Russians or muh Clintons.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:16 am to jdd48
quote:
His family formally announced he was in contact with Wikileaks at the time of his death. Forensic evidence was discovered on his laptop.
oh shite - Special Investigator time.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:17 am to CorporateTiger
quote:Apparently it's bordering on certainty that he was politically assassinated, but the assassin couldn't even steal anything to make it look like a robbery. And apparently if you question about assassination, you're supporting the people who hired the assassin, whomever they may be.
So this board's official position is that it is totally improbable for a robbery by a random thug to go wrong and someone to wind up dead?
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:20 am to goldennugget
Dude was trying to big time some drug dealers and they pulled his card. Everybody in DC knows this.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:21 am to buckeye_vol
quote:If he was the one who leaked the information, that is a massive coincidence if it was just a robbery gone wrong.
Apparently it's bordering on certainty that he was politically assassinated, but the assassin couldn't even steal anything to make it look like a robbery. And apparently if you question about assassination, you're supporting the people who hired the assassin, whomever they may be.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:21 am to buckeye_vol
This board's ability to wildly oscillate between "I need evidence"/"Unnamed sources are meaningless" and "It's obvious that it was X despite a lack of any evidence"/"Unnamed sources said something I agree with? It's totes true" astounds me.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:23 am to CorporateTiger
quote:I agree. I would like a more thorough investigation though. If he was the leaker, this murder case warrants a massive investigation effort, does it not?
This board's ability to wildly oscillate between "I need evidence"/"Unnamed sources are meaningless" and "It's obvious that it was X despite a lack of any evidence"/"Unnamed sources said something I agree with? It's totes true" astounds me.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:24 am to Scruffy
quote:People get wrongfully convicted for Coincidences, even more. And some random criminal wouldn't know of these Coincidences.
If he was the one who leaked the information, that is a massive coincidence if it was just a robbery gone wrong.
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 7:27 am
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:25 am to goldennugget
quote:
yet deny Seth Rich was murdered
I can't think of anyone that has denied this.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:25 am to Scruffy
That is true, but coincidences do happen. I don't say that to be flippant, but stranger things have happened.
Let's assume that he was the leaker. There is still a lot of holes in the case if we are pretending this is a normal investigation into a crime.
This would fall into a very strange realm of assassination if that's what it is. It's covered up enough that there's no way to know it was a hit (which means it loses a lot of deterrence) but also not covered up enough to throw political enemies off the trail (meaning you open yourself up to investigation).
I have more faith in a professional hitman to make a convincing robbery scene than I do a random thug in a major American city.
Let's assume that he was the leaker. There is still a lot of holes in the case if we are pretending this is a normal investigation into a crime.
This would fall into a very strange realm of assassination if that's what it is. It's covered up enough that there's no way to know it was a hit (which means it loses a lot of deterrence) but also not covered up enough to throw political enemies off the trail (meaning you open yourself up to investigation).
I have more faith in a professional hitman to make a convincing robbery scene than I do a random thug in a major American city.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:26 am to buckeye_vol
quote:Sure, but if he was the leaker, should his murder not warrant a massive investigation? Instead, we get the "it was just a random mugging gone wrong" defense.
People get wrongfully convicted for Coincidences, when more. And some random criminal
If he is tied to something as big as the DNC email leak, hell, everything from the FBI to a special prosecutor should be involved.
How is that unreasonable?
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 7:27 am
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:27 am to Scruffy
quote:
If he was the leaker, this murder case warrants a massive investigation effort, does it not?
I don't know about massive, but sure investigate this and the Russians thing. I think it is better on both sides for things to be fully investigated and any corruption to be rooted out.
Republicans control all major branches of government and Trump promised to lock Clint up. I just don't think anything will come of either.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:28 am to Scruffy
quote:His murder should warrant a major investigation because he was murdered. And if he was the leaker, that should warrant an investigation itself. If those two things begin to converge, then so be it. It's not a good idea to start an investigation with a preconceived idea without any evidence. That's a major reason why so many innocent people get wrongfully convicted.
Sure, but if he was the leaker, should his murder not warrant a massive investigation?
quote:You're not the one being unreasonable. Others have already determined guilt.
How is that unreasonable?
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 7:31 am
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:28 am to CorporateTiger
This involves local dirty DC police politico cover up and the FBI. I wonder if this is now coming to a head because the one stonewalling it in bed with the Clinton's was fired? There is def a there, there with this.
New details coming. Has anyone checked HRC's or Obama's twitter?
quote:
"The police department nor the FBI have been forthcoming,” said Wheeler. “They haven't been cooperating at all. I believe that the answer to solving his death lies on that computer, which I believe is either at the police department or either at the FBI. I have been told both.”
When we asked Wheeler if his sources have told him there is information that links Rich to Wikileaks, he said, “Absolutely. Yeah. That's confirmed."
Wheeler also told us, "I have a source inside the police department that has looked at me straight in the eye and said, ‘Rod, we were told to stand down on this case and I can’t share any information with you.’ Now, that is highly unusual for a murder investigation, especially from a police department. Again, I don’t think it comes from the chief’s office, but I do believe there is a correlation between the mayor's office and the DNC and that is the information that will come out [Tuesday].
A full report with the new details will air Tuesday morning on FOX News
New details coming. Has anyone checked HRC's or Obama's twitter?
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 7:31 am
Posted on 5/16/17 at 7:29 am to cajunangelle
Remember what I just said about unnamed sources?
If there is evidence then I would love to see it.
If there is evidence then I would love to see it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News