- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama wanted to allow Iran to convert $5.7B worth of Omani rials into USD, lied about it
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:21 am to bmy
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:21 am to bmy
quote:no they are not you fricking imbecile. The "one time transaction" is access, even if it occurs only one time.
Allowing access and allowing a one time transaction are two different things
My God you are fricking dumb
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 10:23 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:23 am to ChexMix
He is a spineless, gutless, brain dead POS. That is what he is.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:35 am to bmy
quote:
Sorry that you don't like facts
I love facts. Start using them.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:39 am to Mac
All I'm getting from this story is checks and balances worked. Not to say for better or worse. But they got Obama this time lol.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:45 am to joeyb147
quote:
so you're not upset that team Obama tried to break the sanctions issued on Iran and lied about it the american people? and you're not upset that team Obama tried to give one of the world's largest state sponsers of terrorism another 5.7 billion dollars? and you're not upset that team Obama fanned out across the world to convince other banks/businesses that they could do business with Iran without violating the sanctions imposed on them? interdasting...
The reason he is not upset in in bold
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 10:46 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:46 am to golfntiger32
quote:
golfntiger32
Good lord you are dumb.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:46 am to Godfather1
quote:
The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access — albeit briefly — to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so.
They prepared a draft proposal. Lets not act like this is a crime
The draft proposal would have allowed dollars to be used in currency exchanges provided that no Iranian banks, no Iranian rials and no sanctioned Iranian individuals or businesses were involved, and that the transaction did not begin or end in U.S. dollars.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 10:48 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:47 am to bmy
Yikes. This is how far gone today's left is. You should be ashamed.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:47 am to Gulf Coast Tiger
quote:
The reason he is not upset in in bold
I would be upset if I thought Iran was the boogey man and I lived my life afraid of my own shadow.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:50 am to INFOWARRIOR
Something else I noticed... isn't it funny how AP doesn't become fake news when they are critical of Obama lol.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:53 am to INFOWARRIOR
Obama was such a crooked low down communist, it's all coming to light finally.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 6/6/18 at 10:54 am to Nawlens Gator
quote:
Obama was such a crooked low down communist, it's all coming tom light finally.
Isn't removing sanctions and relaxing up trade barriers anti- communist? Please discuss.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 10:56 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:00 am to bmy
quote:
They prepared a draft proposal.
And lied about it.
You asked for a link. Stop trying to move the goalposts.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:01 am to bmy
quote:
So he wanted to allow them to do it as a one time transaction but nothing ever happened..
What a garbage story
It's a garbage story that he wanted to skirt the "deal" he made that those of us with some fricking sense knew wasn't really a deal?
Yeah. OK.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:02 am to bmy
quote:
Allowing access and allowing a one time transaction are two different things.
Fox news
AP covered it too.
So, now they're you're done with your Pavlov's dog routine......
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:02 am to Godfather1
quote:
And lied about it.
You asked for a link. Stop trying to move the goalposts
Preparing a draft means nothing. Do you know how many draft letters I have on hand that I may need sometime in the future?
Also.. you should read the proposal. This is a giant nothingburger outside of a glaring lack of transparency
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:05 am to bmy
quote:
This is a giant nothingburger
You must be an exceedingly well-off OT baller if you consider attempting to launder $5.7 billion a “nothingburger”. To most of us, it’s a “somethingburger”. With cheddar cheese, bacon and Heinz 57.
quote:
a glaring lack of transparency
Semantics aside, that’s lying. Which you claim didn’t happen.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 11:07 am
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:08 am to bmy
quote:
Preparing a draft means nothing. Do you know how many draft letters I have on hand that I may need sometime in the future?
Dude. You're spiraling.
People write drafts for a reason.
For example. I will never be writing a draft letter on why I think we need to raise SS taxes to pay for SS because.........I WOULD NEVER SUGGEST SUCH A THING.
Your act in this thread is comedy.
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:09 am to Godfather1
quote:
You must be an exceedingly well-off OT baller if you consider $5.7 billion a “nothingburger”. To most of us, it’s a “somethingburger”. With cheddar cheese, bacon and Heinz 57.
You're upset about us giving them back their money. Not about side stepping sanctions to convert it to US dollars.
quote:
Semantics aside, that’s lying. Which you claim didn’t happen.
It's not lying but this is just more fake controversy to drum up republican support around an election much like benghazi
Posted on 6/6/18 at 11:11 am to ShortyRob
quote:
People write drafts for a reason.
For example. I will never be writing a draft letter on why I think we need to raise SS taxes to pay for SS because.........I WOULD NEVER SUGGEST SUCH A THING.
Please. The idea that sanctions would begin to be relieved if Iran was compliant with the nuclear deal is plenty of reason to have relevant drafts prepared.
You're conflating preparedness with having an agenda.
This post was edited on 6/6/18 at 11:12 am
Popular
Back to top


1




