Posted by
Message
ThinePreparedAni
USA Fan
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
5321 posts

NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
Q spin off thread for areospace events
Note: Q has not directly posted about this. This thread was spawned by poster discussion.


TL:DR - we may have a tax payer funded secret space program...
That is going to be unveiled to the public...

NY Times

quote:

Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program



quote:

By HELENE COOPER, RALPH BLUMENTHAL and LESLIE KEAN
DECEMBER 16, 2017

WASHINGTON — In the $600 billion annual Defense Department budgets, the $22 million spent on the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program was almost impossible to find. Which was how the Pentagon wanted it. For years, the program investigated reports of unidentified flying objects, according to Defense Department officials, interviews with program participants and records obtained by The New York Times. It was run by a military intelligence official, Luis Elizondo, on the fifth floor of the Pentagon’s C Ring, deep within the building’s maze.


quote:

“We’re sort of in the position of what would happen if you gave Leonardo da Vinci a garage-door opener,” said Harold E. Puthoff, an engineer who has conducted research on extrasensory perception for the C.I.A. and later worked as a contractor for the program. “First of all, he’d try to figure out what is this plastic stuff. He wouldn’t know anything about the electromagnetic signals involved or its function.” The program collected video and audio recordings of reported U.F.O. incidents, including footage from a Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet showing an aircraft surrounded by some kind of glowing aura traveling at high speed and rotating as it moves. The Navy pilots can be heard trying to understand what they are seeing. “There’s a whole fleet of them,” one exclaims. Defense officials declined to release the location and date of the incident.


Vid at site/article

quote:

By 2009, Mr. Reid decided that the program had made such extraordinary discoveries that he argued for heightened security to protect it. “Much progress has been made with the identification of several highly sensitive, unconventional aerospace-related findings,” Mr. Reid said in a letter to William Lynn III, a deputy defense secretary at the time, requesting that it be designated a “restricted special access program” limited to a few listed officials. A 2009 Pentagon briefing summary of the program prepared by its director at the time asserted that “what was considered science fiction is now science fact,” and that the United States was incapable of defending itself against some of the technologies discovered. Mr. Reid’s request for the special designation was denied.




In the background of this:

npr

quote:

Pentagon Announces First-Ever Audit Of The Department Of Defense

December 8, 201712:20 PM ET


quote:

"The Defense Department is starting the first agency-wide financial audit in its history," the Pentagon's news service says, announcing that it's undertaking an immense task that has been sought, promised and delayed for years.

Of the tally that is starting this week, chief Pentagon spokesperson Dana W. White said, "It demonstrates our commitment to fiscal responsibility and maximizing the value of every taxpayer dollar that is entrusted to us."

"Beginning in 2018, our audits will occur annually, with reports issued Nov. 15," the Defense Department's comptroller, David L. Norquist, said.




As this relates to this (which I posted about earlier in the thread):

Image: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/f9435077316c924e4f83ee8d33b41f7092dd3ff23b3ba884a2d42b01f125cc5e.jpeg/FC5589F3-1D1C-4A01-A89D-16B3E83FE2DF.jpeg


msu article about above

quote:

Earlier this year, a Michigan State University economist, working with graduate students and a former government official, found $21 trillion in unauthorized spending in the departments of Defense and Housing and Urban Development for the years 1998-2015.

The work of Mark Skidmore and his team, which included digging into government websites and repeated queries to U.S. agencies that went unanswered, coincided with the Office of Inspector General, at one point, disabling the links to all key documents showing the unsupported spending. (Luckily, the researchers downloaded and stored the documents.)

Now, the Department of Defense has announced it will conduct the first department-wide, independent financial audit in its history (read the Dec. 7 announcement here).

The Defense Department did not say specifically what led to the audit. But the announcement came four days after Skidmore discussed his team’s findings on USAWatchdog, a news outlet run by former CNN and ABC News correspondent Greg Hunter.


quote:

Skidmore and Fitts agreed to work together to investigate the issue further. Over the summer, two MSU graduate students searched government websites, especially the website of the Office of Inspector General, looking for similar documents dating to 1998. They found documents indicating a total $21 trillion in undocumented adjustments over the 1998-2015 period. (The original government documents and a report describing the issue can be found here.)

This post was edited on 11/29 at 9:09 pm


CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
68948 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
You see who tweeted this story first?

Podesta.


Deflection launched


Roger Klarvin
Texas A&M Fan
Central Texas
Member since Nov 2012
39983 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
Nobody is gonna read all that dude


OleWarSkuleAlum
Texas A&M Fan
Member since Dec 2013
5284 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
68
Mulat
LSU Fan
Tulane - Tiger in Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
13364 posts
 Online 

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

we may have a tax payer funded secret space program...



I sincerely hope so


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
271
ThinePreparedAni
USA Fan
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
5321 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

Deflection launched


Agree Cpt (so it has been foretold...)

Could be a big head fake for what is coming on other fronts


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
162
ThinePreparedAni
USA Fan
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
5321 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

Nobody is gonna read all that dude


There is a 430 page thread that disagrees with you....

I did give a TL:DR


waiting4saturday
LSU Fan
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
5238 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

we may have a tax payer funded secret space program...


Water is wet


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
70
philter
Chicago Cubs Fan
Member since Dec 2004
8068 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
I believe the audit is related to Trump taking office. Can't just prepare and start an audit in a few days because an ex-CNN journalist found some documents. MSM trying to bend credit away from the administration a little bit.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
110
notsince98
Missouri Fan
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
8798 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
Where have I heard this before? I said this disclosure was coming.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
53
bmy
East Carolina Fan
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
42067 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
podesta loves the aliens.

UFOs


Errerrerrwere
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2015
22190 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
He actually does. Can’t tell if sarcastic?


bmy
East Carolina Fan
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
42067 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
No.. Podesta really is an alien-disclosure guy. He loves that shite. He's a weird fricker though.

truth is out there


notsince98
Missouri Fan
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
8798 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

No.. Podesta really is an alien-disclosure guy. He loves that shite. He's a weird fricker though.


He is a tool of partial disclosure just like de long. He isn't trying to push full disclosure because he doesn't know about it.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
60
Errerrerrwere
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2015
22190 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
Well, damn, b. We actually agree on something.


Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
33150 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

Working with Mr. Bigelow’s Las Vegas-based company, the program produced documents that describe sightings of aircraft that seemed to move at very high velocities with no visible signs of propulsion, or that hovered with no apparent means of lift.



So if these craft were military in nature, as some have speculated, wouldn't our defense department already know this? Since they apparenty don't, it must be some other unexplained phenomenon?


TheHarahanian
LSU Fan
Duh
Member since May 2017
6562 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
Swamp gas that reflected off a cloud. Nothing more.

No.thing.more.

Oh, and the truth is categorically not out there.
This post was edited on 12/16 at 6:19 pm


TigerOnTheMountain
USA Fan
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
6968 posts

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
Anyone that has ever listened to Art Bell, knows this to be true since 1998.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
143
Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
19321 posts
 Online 

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

NY Times: Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program


My sauces lay out, in clear detail, that those injuries that Reid sustained and that he blamed on an accident with exercise equipment, was actually caused by a force field activated by aliens. They told him to avoid the area, but Reid, not being able to see the field, walked right into it.


Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
19321 posts
 Online 

re: NY Times: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program - spin off for aerospace / esoteric discussion
quote:

So if these craft were military in nature, as some have speculated, wouldn't our defense department already know this? Since they apparenty don't, it must be some other unexplained phenomenon?

You're assuming they would admit it.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
40
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 14next pagelast page

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram