- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:49 am to LSU Patrick
This guy is never going to answer a simple question.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:50 am to Walt OReilly
quote:
I’m just now tuning in but what does any of the last 3-4 witnesses have to do with ACB and the Supreme Court?
Just know that the 4 witnesses in "opposition" did not speak about ACB at all.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:51 am to LSU Patrick
"equitable" - notice the language this hack uses
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:51 am to GEAUXTIGER23
Sorry being a 6 head is a no starter for me.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:52 am to Crow Pie
He's shitting on Durbin, though.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:52 am to TigerCoon
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/18/21 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:54 am to LSU Patrick
Nobody cares, Dick. Get on with it.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:54 am to LSU Patrick
He is losing 2/3s of his time to his palsy
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:55 am to TigerCoon
Sensible common sense gun violence preventable methods
WOW
Non violent felons you nimrod. But yet, probably thinks felons should be able to vote.
WOW
Non violent felons you nimrod. But yet, probably thinks felons should be able to vote.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 11:56 am
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:57 am to jimbeam
Wants felons to have some rights but not all.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:57 am to Crow Pie
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/18/21 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:58 am to jimbeam
quote:
Sensible common sense gun violence preventable methods
Sen. Blumenthal is worried that Judge Barrett would rule laws such as red flag laws, ex parte civil protection orders confiscating guns, etc.. unconstitutional.
And he damn well should be concerned about that because they are.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:58 am to jimbeam
Should they grill this hack or just say: "Okay. Bye?"
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:58 am to TigerCoon
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/18/21 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 11:59 am to hollowpoint
We lost Miss Clarke. Well, that's a shame. 

Posted on 10/15/20 at 12:01 pm to LSU Patrick
Blumenthal is like 76 years old so I wouldn’t but I have an itching to punch him in the gullet
Posted on 10/15/20 at 12:01 pm to LSU Patrick
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/18/21 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 12:03 pm to LSU Patrick
Here is what I would pose to Ms. Clark:
Reading the text of the 2nd and 14th amendments, do you see any rational basis why Judge Barrett would draw a distinction between the protections those amendments allow for their said rights?
2nd
14th, Section 2
Reading the text of the 2nd and 14th amendments, do you see any rational basis why Judge Barrett would draw a distinction between the protections those amendments allow for their said rights?
2nd
quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
14th, Section 2
quote:
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Back to top
