Started By
Message

re: No income taxes. What would that look like?

Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63319 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Of course we could.
If we can overnight increase our GDP by 20%, why do t we?

quote:

Along w/ the tariff hypothetical, simply assume a hypothetical one-time concomitant inflation jump of 20% coinciding with the same amount of available consumer spending money d/t zero IC tax.
This is trading one pile of money for another pile of money. That’s not an increase in productivity.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

No different than any other tax really.
Except, certainly in the case of China, countries reliant on exports to the US would attempt to partially or fully subsidize tariffed goods to maintain their own economy.

It works six ways to Sunday as long as our economy is in trade deficit, and right now that is running nearly $1 trillion/yr.
This post was edited on 10/26/24 at 12:24 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

This is trading one pile of money for another pile of money.
GDP would jump concomitantly. $1 widgets would sell for $1.20. GDP would reflect that. But the additional consideration would be a re-shoring of US industry/jobs.
This post was edited on 10/26/24 at 12:27 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476637 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

certainly in the case of China, countries reliant on exports to the US would attempt to partially or fully subsidize tariffed goods to maintain their own economy.

Tariffs will make the prices of all goods go up, so why would China subsidize their exports even more?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

If we can overnight increase our GDP by 20%, why do t we?
Because folks don't have the funds d/t IT
This post was edited on 10/26/24 at 12:33 pm
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16401 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Wow. I think we found some things we can agree o


So what are things we disagree on?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Tariffs will make the prices of all goods go up, so why would China subsidize their exports even more?
Because, absent subsidy, goods made in the USA which are currently more expensive, would be more relatively affordable. Chinese market share would shrink.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476637 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

absent subsidy, goods made in the USA which are currently more expensive, would be more relatively affordable

Why? That sounds like an assumption that really doesn't have any basis. Prices on everything are going to go up, because that's the point of tariffs. It will make foreign goods cost more so our higher price goods can compete in the market. Literally the point of tariffs
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16401 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

It would look really bad for CPAs and the IRS



They all hate their jobs anyway
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Prices on everything are going to go up
You're under the impression we'd tariff domestic goods?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:43 pm to
I would assume the cost for raw goods for those manufacturers get hit by tarrifs this driving their cost up unless literally everything is going to be made here including raw materials somehow.....
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41311 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

That sounds like an assumption


Literally all your posts are assumptions. Just frick off already fatass
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77631 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:49 pm to
Sorry if I trust professional economists who helped author the plan instead of some stranger on the internet.

Here's the FairTax site. Go nuts.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63319 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Except, certainly in the case of China, countries reliant on exports to the US would attempt to partially or fully subsidize tariffed goods to maintain their own economy.
Except China’s currency floats. They just print more worthless money to “pay” the tariff.

quote:

It works six ways to Sunday as long as our economy is in trade deficit, and right now that is running nearly $1 trillion/yr
It works if the counter party pays the tax in real US dollars, or you have the capacity to import goods that are competitive on an open market. Thats not what China would do though. And we aren’t anywhere near an export cpu try—and would never be unless we abandoned the strong dollar principle. If we did that—our debt would doom us to collapse.

I’d be STRONGLY in fabvor of tariffs if:
-we had excess industrial capacity to export
-government was less than 5% GDP
-US labor was near competitively priced (instead of several multiples higher)
-we had little to no federal debt.

We literally meet none of those criteria.

This post was edited on 10/26/24 at 12:55 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I would assume the cost for raw goods for those manufacturers get hit by tarrifs this driving their cost up
That would be an incorrect assumption. The trade deficit in preponderance reflects manufacturing cost differential, not raw materials. However, if raw materials were not available domestically, they'd not be tariffed. Otherwise the domestic-shift premice would hold.
This post was edited on 10/26/24 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63319 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

GDP would jump concomitantly. $1 widgets would sell for $1.20. GDP would reflect that.
If that were the case, why it just enact price controls and skip giving the government more money?

Price is not productivity.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63319 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Because, absent subsidy, goods made in the USA which are currently more expensive, would be more relatively affordable.
Nope. They would, by definition, be more expensive. Otherwise we’d be competitive without the tariff.

In the end tariffs operate no different than price controls (at best)

quote:

Chinese market share would shrink.
And everything would be more expensive.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Price is not productivity.
Productivity is not the sole component of GDP. However, productivity would increase as international industry returned to the US.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63319 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Prices on everything are going to go up, because that's the point of tariffs. It will make foreign goods cost more so our higher price goods can compete in the market. Literally the point of tariffs
Its fun watching them argue that tariffs “work” because they won’t work.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 10/26/24 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

They would, by definition, be more expensive.
Not relative to tariffed imports.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram