- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Newsome pushes law that makes it a FELONY to seize ballots before they’ve been certified
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:21 pm
I'm thinking his state law won't have any impact on federal authorities, unbelievable!
LINK can't make this shite up!
LINK
LINK can't make this shite up!
quote:
Newsom: Let me speak directly to anyone considering helping President Trump interfere with our election or our count: If you violate California’s laws, if you interfere with our voters, tamper with our ballots, or meddle in our election, you will be prosecuted. It doesn’t matter who gave the order.
That’s why I’m moving forward with new legislation that would make it a felony to seize ballots before the vote has been certified by state and county officials.
We will be the wall he cannot get past because we believe that, once an election is decided, the winner governs for everyone. That’s the architecture of American liberty.
LINK
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:24 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
ballots before they’ve been certified
AKA: Evidence
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:26 pm to lake chuck fan
Not even trying to make it look legitimate. Literally trying to make combatting voter fraud illegal. Good luck pulling that on the Feds douchebag.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:31 pm to Lynxrufus2012
"we believe that, once an election is decided, the winner governs for everyone. That’s the architecture of American liberty."
Funny how that doesn't work for them with Trump
Funny how that doesn't work for them with Trump
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:32 pm to lake chuck fan
I thought they allowed folks to collect ballots on others behalf
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:32 pm to lake chuck fan
But everyone said SDV was crazy that Orange won CA
None of this would be needed if CA is a lock
None of this would be needed if CA is a lock
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:50 pm to lake chuck fan
“ Newsom: Let me speak directly to anyone considering helping President Trump interfere with our election or our count:”(quote)
I.e., interfering with their election cheating. No wondering why everyone is becoming amped for a throw down.
I.e., interfering with their election cheating. No wondering why everyone is becoming amped for a throw down.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:53 pm to lake chuck fan
That's how you say we are going to cheat without saying we're going to count until we get the right numbers.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 3:05 am to C
quote:
I thought they allowed folks to collect ballots on others behalf
I did receive one for my deceased father in Florida from Michigan. He passed on March 7th 2018. This was for the 2020 presidential election.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 5:51 am to lake chuck fan
This guy is a piece of work,
Posted on 7/7/26 at 5:59 am to lake chuck fan
Greasy assed slimeball
Posted on 7/7/26 at 6:30 am to lake chuck fan
Maybe Cali sobers up and gets a non - crook governor….
Posted on 7/7/26 at 6:51 am to Lesalli
quote:
once an election is decided, the winner governs for everyone.
mis quote = should be
quote:
once we have decided who won the election, the winner governs for everyone
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:18 am to Lynxrufus2012
quote:
Not even trying to make it look legitimate
The same with that Nick Shirley act the California legislature passed. The intent behind both are glaringly obvious!
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:20 am to lake chuck fan
The next civil war will begin with government officials arresting each other.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:48 am to Lesalli
quote:
we believe that, once an election is decided, the winner governs for everyone. That’s the architecture of American liberty."
Funny how that doesn't work for them with Trump
It does work, but only because the we he means is not the people. They decide who is in office and it should be accepted without any resistance or seeking of the truth. They didn't want Trump in office, so he is not the winner to them.
Popular
Back to top
11








