Started By
Message

re: Need an explanation on homosexuality

Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:33 pm to
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:33 pm to
For starters you need to keep up, I was replying to a person who bolded WE SHOULDNT JUDGE, and I set him straight. I could care less about the weight you give the bible, it just proves to me you are a lightweight thinker.

No one was replying to you, so I could care less what you think or do, your belief doesn't change the facts as you will see one day.


My Christianity doesn't take a back seat to ANYTHING PERIOD.

The founders prayed in session, they set aside a day of Thanksgiving to God, they were not the secularists your lying professors have told you they were.

In the end, your constitution is going to be a worthless piece of paper when you face the Master on judgment day.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

There are all kinds of genetic abnormalities that occur in nature when a species' population is too large. This is one of nature's ways of combatting overpopulation.

Wut
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75823 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

So how can you make such an absolute judgement on what nature intended?

Because homosexuality doesn't lead to procreation and there is rampant disease outbreaks within the homosexual community. It's like incest. There's a reason children end up retarded or have some kind of genetic abnormalities due to incest. It's not what nature wanted.

I don't care what people do in their private lives as long as it doesn't impact mine. Marry who you want to marry, sleep with who you want to sleep with as long as it's not hurting someone. But to say that homosexuality is anything other than nature combatting overpopulation is just wrong IMO.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

But to say that homosexuality is anything other than nature combatting overpopulation is just wrong IMO.

This is just one of the most asinine statements ever on this board, which is really saying alot. It literally has no scientific basis whatsoever.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35373 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
For starters you need to keep up, I was replying to a person who bolded WE SHOULDNT JUDGE, and I set him straight. I could care less about the weight you give the bible, it just proves to me you are a lightweight thinker.

No one was replying to you, so I could care less what you think or do, your belief doesn't change the facts as you will see one day.


My Christianity doesn't take a back seat to ANYTHING PERIOD.

The founders prayed in session, they set aside a day of Thanksgiving to God, they were not the secularists your lying professors have told you they were.

In the end, your constitution is going to be a worthless piece of paper when you face the Master on judgment day.




You're very judgmental of others; that's one thing. You're insulting and disrespectful in your judgement; that is another thing altogether. We can see you for the way you treat and insult others, regardless of your justification to judge.

It is possible (and others have) judge without calling others idiots and perverts. Once you resort to insults then it appears you have extended beyond judgement of righteousness, and instead delve into self-gratification.
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 4:46 pm
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8527 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

You've never heard of human nature?


So let's take a look at nature. Naturally speaking, with two males together or two females together, how does the species continue?
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75823 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

This is just one of the most asinine statements ever on this board

You haven't been on this board very long then.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

You haven't been on this board very long then.

At least 2 yrs. So not that long, but long enough.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135614 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Monkeys cannibalize other monkeys in nature too. Do you suggest that we follow their example since it is natural?
Perhaps you can provide a word to describe it besides," unnatural" that wouldn't offend your sensibilities?
Revelator, here's the deal. Sexuality and/or sexual gratification in and of itself is not a religious component. It just isn't. Sorry. The faster religious right voyeurs get out of the bedrooms of their fellow Americans, the better.

Like most folks, you are sexually attracted to opposite gender individuals, as am I.
No question.

However, I always try to understand perspectives and perceptions from the other side, as should we all. In that spirit, try to envision a world which spiritually and secularly established your attraction to women as "unnatural" and unacceptable. Would you then thwart your desires and sleep with men? I'd bet you would not. In fact I'd put substantial money behind that bet.

We would all do well to try to understand the world as others see it, and why they see it that way. If we do, and we stiill find fault, then so be it.

Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

So let's take a look at nature. Naturally speaking, with two males together or two females together, how does the species continue?

The same way it does when every once in a while a heterosexual individual is born without the ability to procreate.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75823 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

At least 2 yrs. So not that long, but long enough

So if my question is so asinine, how come there's nothing that benefits the human species as a whole outside of population control when it comes to homosexuality?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135614 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Because homosexuality doesn't lead to procreation and there is rampant disease outbreaks within the homosexual community. It's like incest. There's a reason children end up retarded or have some kind of genetic abnormalities due to incest. It's not what nature wanted.

I don't care what people do in their private lives as long as it doesn't impact mine. Marry who you want to marry, sleep with who you want to sleep with as long as it's not hurting someone. But to say that homosexuality is anything other than nature combatting overpopulation is just wrong IMO.
This is just one of the most asinine statements ever on this board, which is really saying alot. It literally has no scientific basis whatsoever.

Any questions?
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26133 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:52 pm to
When did Barack Obama issue an executive order legalizing gay marriage Roger? Walked into it, indeed.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8527 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

The same way it does when every once in a while


Every once in a while? That's a grand answer there. Let me rephrase. Would the human species continue if all were homosexual? Unless I have missed something it take a male and a female to procreate the species, am I right?
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 4:54 pm
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

So if my question is so asinine

Take out the "if"
quote:

how come there's nothing that benefits the human species as a whole outside of population control when it comes to homosexuality?

Firstly, this statement is flawed.

Secondly, tell me, specifically, how nature "senses" it is becoming overpopulated and how it then "creates" homosexuals to "combat" this overpopulation.

It would probably be wise to begin with a definition of what "nature" refers to when you use it.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:53 pm to
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11463 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Let me rephrase. Would the human species continue if all were homosexual? Unless I have missed something it take a male and a female to procreate the species, am I right?

Once you explain the relevance, I will answer. Otherwise I don't really have the time for this nonsense.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26133 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 4:57 pm to
By the way, there is a case where the Bible supercedes the Constitution. After you suck in that last breath,
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135614 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

So if my question is so asinine, how come there's nothing that benefits the human species as a whole outside of population control when it comes to homosexuality?
Funeral for a Friend/Love Lies Bleeding in and of itself is a "benefit". Absolutely incredibly work!

Da Vinci's work ..... incredible! AND in and of itself it is a "benefit".

Ellen Degeneres makes folks laugh; she's a benefit.

The curtains in my home are beautiful. The guy who hung them is a benefit.

My colleagues who are gay have saved lives of many people. I will damn well guarantee you, the people they saved and who are alive today, and their families, would attest to the "benefit" of gay folks.

This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 5:01 pm
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62003 posts
Posted on 12/15/14 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Revelator, here's the deal. Sexuality and/or sexual gratification in and of itself is not a religious component. It just isn't. Sorry. The faster religious right voyeurs get out of the bedrooms of their fellow Americans, the better.



This has nothing to do with voyeurism because I have zero desire to view homosexual activities. This has to do with political correctness, forcing people to accept views that they find offensive, and the growing tide of opinions that want to label people that hold a traditional view as bigots.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram