- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy officer applies to become the first ever woman to join the elite SEALs
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:14 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:14 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
There is no logical reason I have to have read it first for you to point out the "positive results" that you claimed were omitted.
If we're going to talk about it, you should at least read it.
If you aren't willing to do that, just say so.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:15 pm to Argonaut
quote:
If we're going to talk about it, you should at least read it. If you aren't willing to do that, just say so.
Why don't you tell us the results that prove women should be in combat arms.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:16 pm to Argonaut
quote:
If we're going to talk about it, you should at least read it.
So you cannot back up a claim that you, yourself, made? You can obfuscate all you want.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:16 pm to cajunangelle
GI Jane, baws
BTW, no woman is going to make it through BUD/S without help or special treatment. The Marine Corps already has two separate boot camps. I suspect we'll see that with the SEALs one day (which will completely ruin the SEALS just as the Marines have been ruined).
BTW, no woman is going to make it through BUD/S without help or special treatment. The Marine Corps already has two separate boot camps. I suspect we'll see that with the SEALs one day (which will completely ruin the SEALS just as the Marines have been ruined).
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:16 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
So you cannot back up a claim that you, yourself, made? You can obfuscate all you want.
Are you going to read it, or not?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:18 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Are you going to read it, or not?
Intellectual laziness is not an attractive trait lady.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:19 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:at this point it's pretty obvious that it's just an elaborate troll. if there actually were positive results for her to she would be trumpeting them not asking you to find them
Intellectual laziness is not an attractive trait lady.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:21 pm to ShortyRob
What I'm getting at, is this report that has been trumpeted by several people in this thread, is something most of them haven't even looked at.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:22 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Are you going to read it, or not?
Sure. I think all start at the portion that you claim was omitted. According to you, the rest of the study is "narrow" so I'd like to get to the heart of it. It's critical for me to know which portions of the study were suppressed in order to form an opinion. Where can I find that omitted portion?
You know, the portion of the study that you would have already copy and pasted all over the thread if it said what you claim it does?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:23 pm to cajunangelle
Let her apply and try to pass the test with no special qualifications. If she makes it, good. If she doesn't, it's not because she didnt't try.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:24 pm to Argonaut
quote:that's a nice Dodge but you're on a message board having a discussion and rather than point to the evidence you believe exists you want people to halt discussion so that they can read a 978 page document before you'll go any further
I'm getting at, is this report that has been trumpeted by several people in this thread, is something most of them haven't even looked at.
It's pretty obvious when you're doing. You are certain you have supporting evidence in the document. Then point to it
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:24 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Sure.
Fantastic. Let me know when you're finished.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:25 pm to ShortyRob
I don't think it's unreasonable to ask someone that called me a liar to read this report.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:27 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I don't think it's unreasonable to ask someone that called me a liar to read this report.
You've lied about more than just the report.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:27 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I don't think it's unreasonable to ask someone that called me a liar to read this report.
Its more reasonable to provide evidence backing up your claim.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:27 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Another dodge. Surprise.
The report is 978 pages. The summary is four pages. You really expect me to go through it with you page by page?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:28 pm to northshorebamaman
I haven't lied about anything. Many of you made some incorrent inferences, but that's on you.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:29 pm to Argonaut
The whole study discussion is a farce anyways. If it were true than women could perform on male teams requiring physical prowess without degrading the operational capability of the male teams then we would have women in the major leagues women in the NFL and women in the NBA
At least a couple of them. But heck we don't even have women men's soccer.
The reality is that the best female football player alive couldn't start for any Division 1 program much less the NFL
The best female baseball player alive would be completely non-competitive at the College World Series
And the best woman's basketball player alive would be a liability on even mediocre college basketball teams
I'm not entirely sure what I study can tell you that real life hasn't already told you
At least a couple of them. But heck we don't even have women men's soccer.
The reality is that the best female football player alive couldn't start for any Division 1 program much less the NFL
The best female baseball player alive would be completely non-competitive at the College World Series
And the best woman's basketball player alive would be a liability on even mediocre college basketball teams
I'm not entirely sure what I study can tell you that real life hasn't already told you
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:29 pm to Argonaut
quote:
The report is 978 pages. The summary is four pages. You really expect me to go through it with you page by page?
No. I do not. I simply ask you to provide me the page numbers of the omitted portions.
Popular
Back to top


2




