- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy officer applies to become the first ever woman to join the elite SEALs
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:23 am to ShortyRob
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:23 am to ShortyRob
she wont' make it,so who cares if she tries.
ONE female has made it through RASP 2 to join the Ranger Regiment and that is cake walk compared to BUDS training.
ONE female has made it through RASP 2 to join the Ranger Regiment and that is cake walk compared to BUDS training.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:27 am to ShortyRob
quote:
What the frick are you talking about? It's unassailably true.
Overusing words and emoticons does not improve your position.
quote:
Hey sissy. You're not the only one who has been in the military. Save your BS for someone that doesn't know better. I wasn't talking about selection. I was talking about the course.
I know you were. That's why I called you out on it.
quote:
No you aren't.
Of course I am. I appear to be mostly alone in that.
quote:
Most of the posters are discussion things that are emotion based.
You're simply trying to hide your emotion behind "100% unassailable facts." There is little difference.
quote:
Um. Male to female performance differences aren't some vacuous "opinion".
They are stone cold rock sold unassailable fact. Which, of course, is why you haven't even tried to address them. Because you know they're true.
The same is true of male to male performance differences.
quote:
Exactly. So WE CAN FILL THOSE POSITIONS.
Correct. The difference is that I'm OK with a woman that meets the requirements filling those positions.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:27 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
she wont' make it,so who cares if she tries. ONE female has made it through RASP 2 to join the Ranger Regiment and that is cake walk compared to BUDS training.
I think the fundamental problem is that most people involved in these discussions know that females perform at a lower level than men, they just don't realize that the difference is ENORMOUS.
That's why people get pissed when someone like McEnroe says Williams would be like 700th on the men's tour even though SHE agrees with him.
They just want to believe that it's closer than that. It just isn't.
Every year, multiple high school boys run a faster mile than the women's world record that has held for like 20 years.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:28 am to Argonaut
quote:The difference in male female performance is 100% unassailable fact.
You're simply trying to hide your emotion behind "100% unassailable facts." There is little difference.
I mean, now you're just being obtuse.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:28 am to ShortyRob
quote:
25 pounds overweight
I already pointed out that those people have those resources available to them.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:30 am to Argonaut
quote:
I already pointed out that those people have those resources available to them.
and I pointed out the difference to having the recourses on base that you can use on your own time
To having hired former operators and coaches to spend all their time working with females to get them even close to the standard.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 10:33 am
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:30 am to Argonaut
quote:Talk about something flying right over your head.
25 pounds overweight I already pointed out that those people have those resources available to them.
OK guys. This Argonaut person is Heather, isn't it.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:33 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Well for the fact I've been through a selection course and made it. I just got injured later on in training.
Ah, the old "I'd be a SEAL if I didn't hurt my knee the last week of training."
quote:
You are the only liar in here.
You're an Air Force comm dude talking about team shite and combat like you know anything about either, because "training."
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:33 am to Argonaut
In other words
The very best women are on par to the worst of the men. You realize both groups are very few
The very best women are on par to the worst of the men. You realize both groups are very few
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:34 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
and I pointed out the difference to having the recourses on base that you can use on your own time
To having hired former operators and coaches to spend all their time working with females to get them even close to the standard.
Financially, there is little difference.
Actually, that's not true. It costs a lot more money to have personal trainers available at base gyms for the fat people.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:34 am to Argonaut
quote:
Ah, the old "I'd be a SEAL if I didn't hurt my knee the last week of training."
I never said anything along those lines.
quote:
You're an Air Force comm dude talking about team shite and combat like you know anything about either, because "training."
You are a nobody who doesn't know anything about military. Literally in here making shite up.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:36 am to Argonaut
Now you know what we do, it's time for you to say what you do.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:37 am to Machine
quote:
hey man, as long as she can meet the same standards as the men, go for it.
We can't do that. Eventually, at some point, even if it's years down the road, she might get injured.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:37 am to lsucoonass
quote:
Now you know what we do, it's time for you to say what you do.
We been waiting
The coward won't come clean though.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:37 am to StraightCashHomey21
It's really a simple proposition.
The people with the greatest chance of success at Seal/Ranger/whatever school should be the ones selected.
Given that the first 500 men AFTER the ones already selected STILL have a greater chance of success than ANY females selected is all that one needs to know to answer the question based on reality rather than emotion.
The people with the greatest chance of success at Seal/Ranger/whatever school should be the ones selected.
Given that the first 500 men AFTER the ones already selected STILL have a greater chance of success than ANY females selected is all that one needs to know to answer the question based on reality rather than emotion.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:39 am to Vander
Had a female like this in my platoon, pt stud, but definately was using.
Accepted into dive school and flunked out twice
Accepted into dive school and flunked out twice
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:39 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
I never said anything along those lines.
Nah. You made it through selection and were injured in training.
Selection for what?
quote:
You are a nobody who doesn't know anything about military. Literally in here making shite up.
Oh.
quote:
services
quote:
DoD
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:40 am to Argonaut
quote:
Argonaut
What exactly are you arguing here? I earned a Ranger tab way back in the day , and though the training has changed some I can tell you one inescepable truth, most MEN do not finish these type selection courses, and we're not talking fat boys here, fat boys don't get a shot at the Rangers, or Seals, or Green Berets, or Sniper Recon or any other special operators. They've been weeded out long before .
So saying "well fat men get a chance" is just wrong. no fat men don't get a chance to be a SEAL, or a Ranger, or what have you.
Even the most highly physically fit male Olympian would find it tough to meet the standards in the special operators community, let alone women. If you haven't been through any of the courses, you don't realize how brutal they are.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:41 am to lsucoonass
quote:
Now you know what we do, it's time for you to say what you do.
I have no idea what you do.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:41 am to Argonaut
quote:
Nah. You made it through selection and were injured in training. Selection for what?
A battlefield airmen career field and other posters here can back that up. Including a retired Lt Col.
quote:
Oh.
You keep bring that typo up but its irrelevant.
Popular
Back to top


1


