- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Myth of Robert E. Lee: Legend of Robert E. Lee's heroism and decency is based on fiction
Posted on 6/5/17 at 7:52 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 6/5/17 at 7:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Says the guy that gets his historical info from tv and doesn't realize the us never entered into the into the ICC treaty.
Wouldn't you do better to show that quote of Lincoln's is bogus?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 7:57 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
quote:
Lincoln would have told you the black race was inferior to the white race,
I think I have posted -three- times on -this- thread that Lincoln is on the record supporting the vote for black soldiers.
"It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers."
4/11/65
LINK
Maybe you missed where he said if you could go back to 1860...
Lincoln 1858:
"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races -- that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything."
Posted on 6/5/17 at 7:58 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:You just got pwn3d
WhiskeyPapa
Posted on 6/5/17 at 8:03 pm to WhiskeyPapa
No. I don't have a dog in this evil south virtuous north fight. I just point out you like to call us presidents war criminals even though the us never adopted the icc.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 8:22 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Doesn't the linked piece say he actually did not do this?
I didn't digest every word of it. However, it is widely accepted that Lee, as executor of the estate, complied with Custis' instructions and freed the Washington/Custis slaves by 1862.
NPS link - includes reports that Lee was a sterner taskmaster than his predecessors.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 9:08 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
I think I have posted -three- times on -this- thread that Lincoln is on the record supporting the vote for black soldiers.
I think I am on record as posting that you can't read. If not...let's put that on record right here and now. Notice I said the year 1860 and not April 11, 1865. The Lincoln of 1857-60 was not the same as the Lincoln of 1864-65.
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 6/5/17 at 9:24 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
A war of attrition worked against the south which had 25% of the manpower of the north. But that is what Lee did.
The North never really had to tap that much into their male citizenship. The North steadily replenished their man power with immigrants coming in fresh off of the boat.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 9:35 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
He wasn't.
quote:
The CSA didn’t really have much success on the battlefield
quote:
Lee had as little success outside Virginia as various federal generals had within it. He is vastly overrated. After he wrecked his own army for offensive operations
All bullshite here.. If Lee had the northern war machine and resources that McClellan and Grant had he would have won the war in less than 2 years.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 9:36 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
Maybe you missed where he said if you could go back to 1860... Lincoln 1858: "I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races -- that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything."
His ideas grew and changed.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 9:37 pm to Jeauxseph
quote:
Lee had as little success outside Virginia as various federal generals had within it.
He is vastly overrated. After he wrecked his own army for offensive operations
All bullshite here.. If Lee had the northern war machine and resources that McClellan and Grant had he would have won the war in less than 2 years.
It isn't bullshite to say Lee had no success outside of Virginia. He failed. He lost.
He invaded the north twice and was defeated twice.
Lee and the other secesh operating in Virginia had the had the advantage of operating on ground they knew well where locals were willing to provide them with guide services and intel. That had a lot to do with Lee’s success and the perceived success overall. The Army of the Tennessee did drive the secsh pretty much everywhere they met with the exception of Chickamauga. The rebs held Nashville for less than a year. Even Rosecrans was able to drive them out of East Tennessee without a battle. In West Tennessee, Grant won five battles in ten days and captured a whole reb army, which he paroled.
The parole system broke down because the Secesh government stopped honoring paroles and forcing paroled reb soldiers back into service. Just beyond scummy.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 6:39 am
Posted on 6/5/17 at 9:48 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Lee and the Southern government knew total victory wasn't going to be possible. Their only hope was to outlast the North's resolve to fight. Lee led a band of shoeless, starving soldiers almost to the doorstep of Washington DC with no way of replenishing his resources or man power. Name one other general in that period or hell.... any period who could have done better against those odds. You claim that he was overrated.. did he make mistakes? yep... Did he begin to feel his army was invincible before Gettysburg?? Yep But was he overrated?? Hell no man
Posted on 6/6/17 at 5:59 am to McLemore
quote:
quote: You are leaving out a sizable portion of the population, especially in the south, who KNEW blacks were equal to whites....and that was black folks....but of course they don't count...... Is this a for-real post? Bookmarked When I am searching for the perfect example of "obtuse" to help someone understand the definition, I will refer back.
There is nothing at all obtuse (insensitive or slow to understand) about my pointing out that when someone states that the only people at the time who didn't think whites were superior they are leaving black people out ....or maybe suggesting that black people thought they were inferior to whites....either way the person making that statement would be dead wrong. The only way that would serve as a means to explain obtuse is by your using it to show how you are slow to understand.....
Posted on 6/6/17 at 6:45 am to Jeauxseph
quote:
Lee and the Southern government knew total victory wasn't going to be possible. Their only hope was to outlast the North's resolve to fight. Lee led a band of shoeless, starving soldiers almost to the doorstep of Washington DC with no way of replenishing his resources or man power. Name one other general in that period or hell.... any period who could have done better against those odds. You claim that he was overrated.. did he make mistakes? yep... Did he begin to feel his army was invincible before Gettysburg?? Yep But was he overrated?? Hell no man
He was a loser and he is a hero to losers.
Further, the rebs held every expectation to win a military victory. Your ignorance does not become you. The secesh thought that Britain would intervene on their side. They burned bales of cotton to create a shortage.
"The first eighteen months of the Civil War were critical to its outcome, not only because of what happened on the battlefields in America but also on what transpired in the policymaking rooms in Europe. The war hung in the balance as Lincoln searched for a general and tried to keep the four Border States (slave states that had not seceded) of Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware, and Missouri in the Union, while Davis commanded an army that succeeded in the East but stumbled in the West, and relied on King Cotton Diplomacy to force European nations to grant recognition. Unfortunately for the South, its bumper crops in the two years previous to the war had allowed the two chief benefactors of that trade, Britain and France, to stock huge surpluses that freed them from economic pressure throughout this pivotal period.[2]"
LINK
Rebel efforts both political and military were basically pathetic and ineffective.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 6:53 am
Posted on 6/6/17 at 7:47 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Posted on 6/5/17 at 4:33 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
Don't you know -anything-?
At this point, I think it is best to just stop responding to WP. At least that is what I have done. He has some sort of unnatural fixation with the evil southerners vs the altruistic northerners that is akin to the ISIS death-cult mental dysfunction. Best to leave him frothing on the side to the road and pass him by.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 7:51 am to Jeauxseph
quote:
Lee led a band of shoeless, starving soldiers almost to the doorstep of Washington DC
He did not. Jubal Early did.
Can you not see how stupid that sounds? Starving? Shoeless?
President Lincoln offered the south $400,000,000 in February 1865 with the so-called CSA teetering on disaster - if they would end the war.
"The national resources, then, are unexhausted, and, as we believe, inexhaustible."
A. Lincoln 12/6/64
What kind of general was Lee if his troops were shoeless and starving?
A bad general - a very bad general.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 7:59 am to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
Lee
quote:
A bad general - a very bad general.
quote:
WhiskeyPapa
A poster - a very bad poster. Or a two-bit troll
Posted on 6/6/17 at 8:10 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Don't you know -anything-?
At this point, I think it is best to just stop responding to WP. At least that is what I have done. He has some sort of unnatural fixation with the evil southerners vs the altruistic northerners that is akin to the ISIS death-cult mental dysfunction. Best to leave him frothing on the side to the road and pass him by.
When the neo rebs put their ignorance and willful disinformation on display it needs to be countered.
It is pretty much that simple. I never start these threads and I would be glad to see them stop.
The heroes of the Civil War are the men who rallied to to Colors of the United States. And none others are.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 8:30 am to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
What kind of general was Lee if his troops were shoeless and starving?
A bad general - a very bad general.
I'm not sure what he could have done about that. I'm also not sure what the Confederacy's military failure out west had to do with Lee. He couldn't be in two different regions of the country at once.
Popular
Back to top


2




