- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: #Muh81MillionVotes Truthers - Please Explain This Data
Posted on 2/5/21 at 1:56 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 2/5/21 at 1:56 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
So let’s see it
I agree. Still waiting to see where Biden and team show proof it was a legit election.
I mean you clearly believe that it was legit. Can you show me the evidence that confirms that?
1
Posted on 2/5/21 at 1:58 pm to Blitzed
Sure. State-level certifications and the joint session of Congress that certified those electors.
But you have the burden of proof when you allege fraud. You can’t “prove” a negative.
But you have the burden of proof when you allege fraud. You can’t “prove” a negative.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 1:58 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 2/5/21 at 1:59 pm to Seldom Seen
Just QQQQQQQQuestioning things, bud, as we’re taught to do here.
Vox has taught me that if your premise is incorrect then your conclusion will be incorrect.
So I’m all about questioning premises now
Vox has taught me that if your premise is incorrect then your conclusion will be incorrect.
So I’m all about questioning premises now
This post was edited on 2/5/21 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:01 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Sure. State-level certifications and the joint session of Congress that certified those electors.
But you have the burden of proof when you allege fraud. You can’t “prove” a negative.
And you are 100% sure those systems are not compromised?
If so can I see the proof.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:06 pm to Blitzed
You have the burden of proof to show fraud.
I know you want to get into this masturbatory logic loop, but you cannot prove a negative no matter how hard you try.
I can allege you buttfrick puppies and there is no amount of evidence you can present to refute that allegation categorically and comprehensively.
That’s why the burden would be on me to present evidence in the affirmative to show you do actually buttfrick puppies.
So do you have the source data for this or not?
I know you want to get into this masturbatory logic loop, but you cannot prove a negative no matter how hard you try.
I can allege you buttfrick puppies and there is no amount of evidence you can present to refute that allegation categorically and comprehensively.
That’s why the burden would be on me to present evidence in the affirmative to show you do actually buttfrick puppies.
So do you have the source data for this or not?
This post was edited on 2/5/21 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:08 pm to boosiebadazz
I just asked a question. Why can’t you answer it?
You are 100% sure those systems aren’t compromised?
If you believe that..can you provide me proof.
Pretty simple.
You are 100% sure those systems aren’t compromised?
If you believe that..can you provide me proof.
Pretty simple.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:08 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
So I’m all about questioning premises now
Like I said, the first line of his data checks out on the IP location. I've been in IT since 1993. But I'm 100% confident no data is going to change your mind.
This post was edited on 2/5/21 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
So do you have the source data for this or not?
There's three cases going before SCOTUS in the next 2 weeks.
The problem hasn't been in having the evidence to present, it's been finding a bench that isn't too chicken shite to hear it, because they know they're not getting the chaos back in the box once it's opened.
ETA - It matters not one bit if a message board poster has the data. The real question is, do the forensic experts who have presented it to this point, when they're finally heard before a court?
It would appear that they do, otherwise they'd be excoriated for fraud and brought up on perjury charges for filing false affidavits.
This post was edited on 2/5/21 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Vox has taught me that if your premise is incorrect then your conclusion will be incorrect.
It's not my fault you never read Atlas Shrugged.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:14 pm to riccoar
Sure. IP location searches have been a thing for awhile now.
If I wanted to create an IP address on a chart that pinged to a specific location when entered into an IP geolocator, I could do that, right?
That’s because certain segments of the IP are used for general geographic area and each has their own unique numeral code, right?
LINK
If I wanted to create an IP address on a chart that pinged to a specific location when entered into an IP geolocator, I could do that, right?
That’s because certain segments of the IP are used for general geographic area and each has their own unique numeral code, right?
quote:
IP Details include Decimal, Hostname, ASN, ISP, Organization, Type, Assignment, Continent, Latitude, Longitude, Postal Code, and a map.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/5/21 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:14 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
It's not my fault you never read Atlas Shrugged.
I’m not sure he can read at all. He has yet to answer my question.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:17 pm to Blitzed
That’s because your premise is incorrect. I don’t have the burden of proof. You do.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:19 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That’s because your premise is incorrect. I don’t have the burden of proof. You do.
I think you are making this much more complicated than it has to be.
I’m just asking if you if think the system..from the machines..to the judges..etc...are 100% free of corruption?
It’s yes or no.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:23 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Any source data, brochacho?
Shut the hell up. Even if he had Joe Biden literally on video changing votes while getting sucked off by Kamala, you'd still ask where is the evidence?
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:25 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
But you have the burden of proof when you allege fraud. You can’t “prove” a negative.
You're framing this as a legal question, but it goes beyond legality. The legality is important, and we would all prefer that things be settled by a fair court system, but the legal aspect is less important than the consent of the governed.
In that question, it is incumbent on those who would govern a free people to convince the people that elections are fairly decided.
Obviously the play for the powers that be is to demonize all talk of election fraud, and it's working to some extent, but I don't think it will ultimately be successful.
Either way, your lawyer bullshite isn't helpful in any way.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:31 pm to BornCritic
quote:
Either way, your lawyer bullshite isn't helpful in any way.
He’s smart enough to know when he is pinned into a corner and plead the 5th when asked a simple yes or no question.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:37 pm to VoxDawg
Tell the prog filth to GFT all day long. But don't presume Trump supporters don't know there was election fraud.
The venue for getting this in the mainstream has to happen. The POS liar dems & GOPe about have it as a crime to say there was voter fraud.
This needed to be out there months ago. When Trump's lawyers had their first presser this could have been shown.
It is sadly too late. Unless someone calls for a presser and puts it out and plays this. Sadly, they will shut it down...
The venue for getting this in the mainstream has to happen. The POS liar dems & GOPe about have it as a crime to say there was voter fraud.
This needed to be out there months ago. When Trump's lawyers had their first presser this could have been shown.
It is sadly too late. Unless someone calls for a presser and puts it out and plays this. Sadly, they will shut it down...
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Any source data, brochacho?
Or are we just supposed to accept your premise without questioning it?
You accept reams of information daily without seeing the “source data”.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 2:40 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Even so, if you're going to hack an election, wouldn't you use something to mask your location?
Of course. This was primarily conducted by the CIA here domestically. They want people to trace it to other countries and not themselves.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News