- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mueller adds 4 more far leftist attorneys.....
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:06 am
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:06 am
Nothing to see here.
Read this entire article and court documents will show you HOW made up this is. These people completely made up things.
They can't produce anything and made this up so they are scrambling to keep the court from calling them out.
So they add 4 more far left attornies.
LINK
Read this entire article and court documents will show you HOW made up this is. These people completely made up things.
quote:
Having produced not one iota of discovery in this criminal case the unlawfully appointed Special Counselrequests a special and unprecedented blanket protective order covering tens of millions of pages of unclassified discovery. Having made this special request based on a secret submission to the Court and a hysterical dithyramb about the future of the American elections, one would think that the Special Counsel would cite to case holdings that support this remarkable request. But no, instead, the Special Counsel seeks to equate this make-believe electioneering case to others involving international terrorism and major drug trafficking, and relies only on irrelevant dicta from inappropriate, primarily out-of-circuit cases. In short, fake law, which is much more dangerous than fake news.
They can't produce anything and made this up so they are scrambling to keep the court from calling them out.
So they add 4 more far left attornies.
LINK
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:12 am to Jjdoc
How many months has it been? I know the far left still clings to hope, but I imagine everyone else has long since moved on.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:22 am to Jjdoc
“Gateway Pundit.” Nothing more need be said. It is the Right equivalent of a Lefty relying upon Mother Jones. Perhaps more-biased-still.
Headline: Rogue DOJ Adds Four More Leftist Attorneys to Mueller Team in Last Ditch Attempt to Save Phony Russian Bot Case
No objective reader would take the time to even look at an article bearing that headline.
Headline: Rogue DOJ Adds Four More Leftist Attorneys to Mueller Team in Last Ditch Attempt to Save Phony Russian Bot Case
No objective reader would take the time to even look at an article bearing that headline.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:32 am
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:26 am to Jjdoc
How many angry democrats does it take to torture common sense?
Forget about turning a lightbulb. There are no lightbulbs illuminating with this group.
Forget about turning a lightbulb. There are no lightbulbs illuminating with this group.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:27 am to AggieHank86
Such ignorance from a poster.
Every court document is listed. Every word quoted is from those documents.
Every court document is listed. Every word quoted is from those documents.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:33 am to Jjdoc
So rather than winding it down, Clinton hack Mueller is gearing up 4 more Clinton hacks?
Great.
Great.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:34 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No objective reader would take the time to even look at an article bearing that headline.
Yet all the documents are there, plain to see.
I didn't vote for Trump, but I'm aware enough to know what this is.
After everything the past two years, that headline is correct.
Now, if Trump and his ilk destroyed evidence like the Dems did during their investigation, I would agree with your point.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:36 am to AggieHank86
You mean like every news agency on today's journalism?
How many WaPo, cnn, nyt headlines have kept you from reading them?
Facts are within the article. The court documents are there.
How many WaPo, cnn, nyt headlines have kept you from reading them?
Facts are within the article. The court documents are there.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:37 am
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:39 am to Dale51
how many years did the Clinton special counsel last. don't remember any repubs saying this has gone on way to long. different when it's against you isn't it.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:41 am to 56lsu
quote:
how many years did the Clinton special counsel last. don't remember any repubs saying this has gone on way to long. different when it's against you isn't it.
Whataboutism at its finest!
and the Clinton investigation had actual evidence of a crime
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:43 am to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
Every court document is listed. Every word quoted is from those documents.
Huh?
What part of "refusal to answer 70 discovery requests" is complying?
The "organization" they are just making up, it doesnt exist.
And when called on it they claim the ole "classified/danger to national security/damage to on going case/might reveal interview techniques" (did I miss one). And every time we do finally get the info it turns out they were just hiding information that had nothing to do with the aforementioned other than that of them hiding corruption.
Face it, in mueller's hubris, he never dreamed Russians would come to his house and slap him, so he is doing the usual, trying to hide behind his momma's skirts.
Hopefully when U1 is unveiled we will see just who was HELPING hide russian collusion, mueller and his buddy rosenstein.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:44 am to Jjdoc
quote:
It's been since 2015
Actually much earlier than 2015, the Swamp corruption has been building to the present day crescendo for the past 60 years....., hell, maybe since 12/23/1913.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:44 am to Jjdoc
this thing has been a farce since day 1
time to shut it down and issue pardons
time to shut it down and issue pardons
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:47 am to 56lsu
quote:
how many years did the Clinton special counsel last.
Benghazi? Is that what you are referring to?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:48 am to Jjdoc
quote:The following is the ENTIRE write-up regarding the alleged “bias” of these attorneys.
Facts are within the article. The court documents are there.
quote:That is some seriously damning stuff regarding bias against Trump. They are longtime DoJ lawyers, working at important positions in the TRUMP DoJ ... and one of them got married IN A BUILDING!
Kravis served as special counsel in the Obama White House starting in 2009. He currently serves in the Public Integrity Section of the DOJ. His appointment to the Mueller probe after working for Obama shows Mueller’s extreme lack of integrity. Curtis represented Obama’s DOJ in the Bradley [Chelsea] Manning case. According to the far left New York Times, Rakoczy was married at the Whittemore House, the home of the Woman’s National Democratic Club in Washington.
The only “documents” about them in the article are their Notices of Appearance. “Dear Judge, I am here. Love, Lawyer.”. Nasty stuff.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 9:51 am
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:48 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
trinidadtiger
Please learn how to respond to the proper poster you wish to correct. Thanks.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:49 am to Homesick Tiger
bill Clinton, there was no special counsel for Benghazi.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:52 am to AggieHank86
Again.... how many NYT, CNN, WaPo etc headlines have kept you from reading.
You are and obvious hypocrite and hack.
The court docs are inside the article.
The facts are he has a complete team of anti trump people who are democrats.. some were on team HRC.
Deal with the facts
You are and obvious hypocrite and hack.
The court docs are inside the article.
The facts are he has a complete team of anti trump people who are democrats.. some were on team HRC.
Deal with the facts
Popular
Back to top


19





