- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Morning Melt jobs numbers report "this is an 11 year extension to Obama economy"
Posted on 2/7/20 at 8:39 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
Posted on 2/7/20 at 8:39 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
All you have to say to that is “then why is his right hand man running in 4th place for president?”
Posted on 2/7/20 at 8:42 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
If I recall correctly, George W. Bush had a pretty good economy during his first term too. We all saw what happened during his second term in office.
Leftist policies destroyed the American economy? Seems like I remember hearing about how Bush went to Congress and told that cocksucker Barney Frank that this would happen if it wasn’t fixed.
Posted on 2/7/20 at 8:55 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Seems like I remember hearing about how Bush went to Congress and told that cocksucker Barney Frank that this would happen if it wasn’t fixed.
He did
He was then branded a Racist for wanting to keep minorities and low income families in the ghettos.
Then, the bubble hit and Bush was blamed for allowing it to happen.
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:22 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
If I recall correctly, George W. Bush had a pretty good economy during his first term too. We all saw what happened during his second term in office.
That's it?
That's the straw you are grasping at?
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:24 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Clinton-era policies involving home mortgages came back to bite us in the arse.
Under the OUTSTANDING leadership of Franklin Raines!!!
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:27 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
you refer to peter navarro and larry kudlow?
Can they report figures with better accuracy ?
If so yes.
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:38 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Can they report figures with better accuracy ?
ah yes, it's much more important to steer attention to the revision process itself here under Trump's agencies.
but as for the fact that it resulted in numbers much weaker than we've been thinking all this time? nah, probably not worth a mention.
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:39 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
If I recall correctly, George W. Bush had a pretty good economy during his first term too. We all saw what happened during his second term in office.
The Democrats' Community Reinvestment Act finally imploded.
This post was edited on 2/7/20 at 9:40 am
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:40 am to lsufan1971
quote:Who said this?
"this is an 11 year extension to Obama economy"
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:41 am to TigerVespamon
quote:
Who said this?
meant to ask the same, since OP put it in quotes and all
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:42 am to lsufan1971
Let them lie to themselves,as usual
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:43 am to lsufan1971
They may think this helps them. However. It's a tacit admission that the economy now is good
Which in turn
pretty much destroys their 2016 "if he's elected, he'll destroy the economy" narrative
Which in turn
Pretty much eliminates that as an argument in 2020
Which in turn
pretty much destroys their 2016 "if he's elected, he'll destroy the economy" narrative
Which in turn
Pretty much eliminates that as an argument in 2020
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:43 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
ah yes, it's much more important to steer attention to the revision process itself here under Trump's agencies.
That’s not the question you asked.
You didn’t ask who was to blame for the numbers, you asked who was to blame for the downward revision. I answered directly, appropriately, and accurately (unlike the shitty economists).
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:44 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
That’s not the question you asked.
Oh for frick's sake. Look at the post I was responding to.
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:48 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:IOW those lowered 2018-19 employment figures show wage growth was a lot stronger, and job growth numbers in 2019-20 better than previously thought? Right?
to reiterate, job growth in the first 3-4 quarters following the tax cut & trade war just got revised down by half a million.
This post was edited on 2/7/20 at 10:11 am
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:48 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
aw what happened during his second term in office.
Doing great until the CarterClinton = 'err body deserves a hime" initiative of giving out trash loans, followed by the chicanery of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd kept Bush from fixing the problem = yeah that bubble burst - right on time to usher in the worlds POTUS of all time who continued to allow the economy stew in the aftermath.
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:50 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
IOW those lowered 2018-19 employment figures show wage growth was a lot stronger in 2019-20 than previously thought? Right?
why would you assume that
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:50 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:But that is not true. Now, is it.
as for the fact that it resulted in numbers much weaker than we've been thinking all this time?
Posted on 2/7/20 at 9:51 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:One stands on the other.
why would you assume that
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News