- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More bad news for Democrats
Posted on 1/15/25 at 10:33 am to armtackledawg
Posted on 1/15/25 at 10:33 am to armtackledawg
Don't worry, the US Census Bureau will have another "tabulating error" that they won't discover until after the congressional reapportionment is complete just like in '20. Whoopsie!
0
Posted on 1/15/25 at 10:37 am to armtackledawg
That is a projected 13 electoral votes moving from Dem strongholds to states that voted GOP. That's like picking up another state without doing anything.
If these numbers hold, Trump would have won 325-213. A GOP candidate could win without Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania AND Arizona in the post 2030 map.
If these numbers hold, Trump would have won 325-213. A GOP candidate could win without Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania AND Arizona in the post 2030 map.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 10:38 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
The problem is they’ll make it more difficult in red states after they fled their dem states and will continue their dumb beliefs with them. Texas is an example with way too many Dems and dumb reps that should never be in power.
OK has grown a lot with newcomers and I was worried pre election how the voting rolls changed so looked them up. What I found shocked me. The Dems lost lots of registered voters and Pubs gained a ton. I expected to stay ruby red but the Pubs overwhelmingly gained where Dems lost.
So the data isn’t showing these commies changing our electorate. At least not yet.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 10:43 am to Penrod
The map of California is geographically overwhelmingly red. That means millions of voters are conservative in California and are just simply outnumbered by the concentrated population centers that are blue. I have had a dozen neighbors in my current neighborhood and previous neighborhood that left California and are red as can be.
The liberals I know here are from already red parts of Texas. I do live out in a slightly more rural than urban area, so I'm curious if the location they relocate to is more indicative of voting behavior than the sheer number.
One of my current neighbors was a high enough earner that he was subject to the exit tax California is trying to impose on high earning residents leaving the state. So far he hasn't had to pay anything to them despite their efforts.
The liberals I know here are from already red parts of Texas. I do live out in a slightly more rural than urban area, so I'm curious if the location they relocate to is more indicative of voting behavior than the sheer number.
One of my current neighbors was a high enough earner that he was subject to the exit tax California is trying to impose on high earning residents leaving the state. So far he hasn't had to pay anything to them despite their efforts.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 11:28 am to WhiskeyThrottle
Exit tax? Lord have mercy.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 11:31 am to armtackledawg
That's awesome.
Wish they would do an actual census and I wonder what the numbers would be.
Wish they would do an actual census and I wonder what the numbers would be.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 11:33 am to armtackledawg
Thats a heckin swing if 23 EVs 
Posted on 1/15/25 at 11:38 am to armtackledawg
Tells me the rats are migrating east and south!
Posted on 1/15/25 at 11:47 am to Auburn80
Trump did about 3% better in Austin this year than 2020 or 2016. He also won the state with almost 57% of the votes. Hardly trending blue. Dems just want you to think it’s a battleground. It’s not.
This post was edited on 1/15/25 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/15/25 at 12:21 pm to Rex Feral
quote:Yeah, this is huge.
That's plus 10 electoral votes for non battleground states with 3 more for states that went red in 24.
I remember scenarios where if Trump didn’t win Pennsylvania, he had to win maybe Nevada and another state to just reach 270.
This opens up many more avenues to win 270 for the right.
This post was edited on 1/15/25 at 12:22 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News