- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miss Lindsey about to hold impromptu presser
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:39 am to CAD703X
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:39 am to CAD703X
quote:
This is the correct response to this latest stall tactics by the dem/media machine.
It will be another bombshell after Bolton testifies followed by another and another.
I'm not sure that they won't use whatever they start screaming about next for the next Impeachment Inquiry.
0
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:40 am to Stonehog
It's not the right move. It's the politically expedient move. By rights it should be dismissed immediately.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:40 am to Stonehog
quote:Get real.
It's the right move. People were already saying Trump wouldn't be acquitted in the eyes of many if Republicans didn't bend a little on witnesses. Have a couple witnesses, take the vote, acquit Trump and move on. This allows Republicans to say they had a fair trial. Blocking witnesses would be a bad look for a lot of independents and that's who the Republicans are going after.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:41 am to GeauxBayouBengals
quote:
Get real.
Blocking witnesses is a bad look for people on the fence. Argue otherwise if you want.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:42 am to Stonehog
Democrats in the house blocked witnesses, Democrats didn’t seem to mind then?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:43 am to Stonehog
quote:
Blocking witnesses is a bad look for people on the fence. Argue otherwise if you want.
Anyone "on the fence" at this point is ready for this to be over. I don't think the "fence sitters" are weighing 'guilt v innocence' at all. They are weighing 'Asshat R v Asshat D' and this episode is Asshat neutral
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:44 am to CAD703X
Does anyone in DC actually own a fricking clock? Damn. How hard is it to show up for one of these things on time, especially when it's going on almost directly outside your office door?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:44 am to Stonehog
quote:I'll argue that Republicans won't get credit for a fair trial no matter what they do. They can allow every Democrat witness and none of the President's witnesses and if Trump is acquitted it will still be screamed from the rooftops that it was unfair. Get real.
Blocking witnesses is a bad look for people on the fence. Argue otherwise if you want.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 10:46 am
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:46 am to BoarEd
quote:
It's not the right move. It's the politically expedient move. By rights it should be dismissed immediately.
Semantics aside, it's the correct move.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:46 am to Stonehog
quote:
Blocking witnesses is a bad look for people on the fence. Argue otherwise if you want.
Ok
I bet you believed all the women who kept popping up during kavanaugh and drug that out for a month.
Yes please. Let's treat the Dems fairly.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:48 am to Stonehog
quote:
Semantics aside, it's the correct move.
I believe if you're arguing on the merits of the law it absolutely is not the correct move. In fact, it's a miscarriage of justice. This should end now. But it won't.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:48 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Anyone "on the fence" at this point is ready for this to be over. I don't think the "fence sitters" are weighing 'guilt v innocence' at all.
They still want a fair trial. Blocking witnesses is a presumption of guilt. I'm just talking about public perception, not the merits of the Democrats argument. We all know it's bullshite but a lot of people don't.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:49 am to Stonehog
quote:
People were already saying Trump wouldn't be acquitted in the eyes of many
Those same people are not going to accept the decision regardless of how many people testify.
Schiff and Nadler brought over a shitty product. They failed to prove there was a crime. Time for the Semate to get back to work.
There is a reason why the House is supposed to interview witnesses. They can do in committee. The entirety of the Senate and the Chief Justice of SCOTUS are being held hostage over a coup attempt.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:49 am to Stonehog
When is this press conference taking place? Says 11:30 Eastern Time. That was 20 minutes ago.....
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:49 am to Stonehog
quote:
It's the right move. People were already saying Trump wouldn't be acquitted in the eyes of many if Republicans didn't bend a little on witnesses. Have a couple witnesses, take the vote, acquit Trump and move on.
You clearly don't quite understand some of the more important aspects at play here. In order "have a couple of witnesses" just like that, Trump would have to waive executive privilege. And you don't simply willy nilly do that. If you don't understand why, then that's on you and you will just have to do your own research on it.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:49 am to Rebel
Did the presser happen yet?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:49 am to Stonehog
quote:Michael Scott what?
Blocking witnesses is a presumption of guilt.
The house had every opportunity to call him. This is theater.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:50 am to CAD703X
So what? People who are on the fence about this are going to vote for Republicans because they "did the right thing"?
bullshite!!!
Who believes that nonsense?
bullshite!!!
Who believes that nonsense?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:50 am to jawnybnsc
Stontear believes it
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:50 am to CAD703X
quote:
I bet you believed all the women who kept popping up during kavanaugh and drug that out for a month.
I didn't, but having the investigation turned out to be the right move in the end. The FBI investigated, he was clean, and he got the votes because of it.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News