- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mickey Goldmill: You claimed the judge was selected at random....
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:24 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:24 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
your convicted felon cult leader
The convicted felons moniker doesn't have as much negative flare as you people think, especially since you cucks can saint thug criminals to justify burning cities down. Y'all have worked for years to try to lower the stigma of felons and now y'all try to cart it out like the loser tools y'all are.
39 million dollars in less than 10 hours proves how stupid you Fascists are. Keep supporting your dementia ridden tween daughter molester. You groomer.
0
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:24 pm to bhtigerfan
He won't ban bet. He knows he is spewing bullshite.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:29 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
How about a ban bet you fat bitch?
quote:
When this is overturned on appeal, you crawl back into the shithole you came from and stop posting your dribble.
we can only wish!
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:30 pm to Crimsonians
quote:
He won't ban bet. He knows he is spewing bullshite.
ummmmm it is a SHE.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:31 pm to Crimsonians
I wonder if it is overturned what will the call him to try to still connected the "convicted felon" moniker. "Convicted by his peers felon" seems a bit long winded.
Really is funny how they want to change words that offend in legal docs to stop hurting feelings, but when it's Trump or a White guy they just refresh the meaning. Democrats are the stinky whity tighties skid marks of society.
Really is funny how they want to change words that offend in legal docs to stop hurting feelings, but when it's Trump or a White guy they just refresh the meaning. Democrats are the stinky whity tighties skid marks of society.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:39 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
ummmmm it is a SHE
Fo real realz?
As that really says a lot.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 1:52 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
ummmmm it is a SHE.
Ummmm IT is a bitch.
FIFY.
A evil deranged retarded one at that.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 2:43 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
No, I'm saying this case was a slam-dunk
Agreed.
Rigged cases are.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 2:46 pm to BugAC
Cuckmill=SFPedo
Same cocksucker.
Same cocksucker.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:34 pm to senshado
quote:
Stormy's signed denial of the affair, the election law expert, etc)
I don't want to get lost in the weeds here, but you picked two examples that are very weak arguments.
I don't know if Stormy's signed denial was entered into evidence, but she was cross-examined about it. She admitted she signed her name to a statement denying the sexual encounter. I don't think the actual document was necessary at that point.
And all this whining about Trump's legal expert...I can't imagine a judge EVER allowing a legal expert to testify in a criminal trial. It is the Judge's responsibility to interpret the law for the jury, and the jury's job to determine whether sufficient facts have been proven to convict. There is no reason to use a legal expert.
I primarily practice patent litigation, and we use legal experts from time to time to help explain the complex legal issues involved; issues the judges do not encounter often. Some judges won't let us use them in jury trials, and some judges get pissed at us for even asking. I don't think any of them deny us experts because they are corrupt.
Merchan made some decisions I didn't understand. I don't know why he was so anxious to limit Costello's testimony, for example. And even though New York juries do not usually get a copy of the instructions, it seems like that would have been a good idea in this case, assuming Trump agreed.
His most aggregious offense, of course, may have been allowing this case to proceed based on an unclear indictment. I'm not a criminal attorney, and I don't practice in New York, but both the indictment and the jury instructions seem like 6th Amendment violations. Curious what the appellate courts have to say about it.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:45 pm to BamaAtl
So you're saying that with fair instructions and application of the law, NY would also acquit Trump like Florida will but in Florida, with unfair instructions and application of the law, Mrrchan would get FL to convict?
Sounds like you're too stupid to acknowledge you just admitted Merchan was going to get a guilty verdict no matter what or where. Nice self own, retard.
Sounds like you're too stupid to acknowledge you just admitted Merchan was going to get a guilty verdict no matter what or where. Nice self own, retard.
This post was edited on 5/31/24 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:46 pm to Barstools
Best to ignore BamaPOS. Not an honest bone in shim’s body.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:48 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Can we go back 12 months and trade both Merchan and Cannon? Trump's still convicted, except this time it would be in 2 different venues
Your legal takes are always good for a chuckle.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:49 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
No, I'm saying this case was a slam-dunk and barring masterful work from Trump's defense attorneys, he was getting convicted
What was the predicate crime and when was it submitted into evidence? You dumb idiot.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:50 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Who knows what an appeals court will ultimately do, but honest lawyers aren't screaming about an error of the law that makes it ripe for appeal. The biggest gripe, about the unanimity of predicate acts, appears pretty standard for New York State.
There are at least three evidentiary rulings that go against well established norms. You are so fricking dumb.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:53 pm to Dday63
quote:
I don't know if Stormy's signed denial was entered into evidence, but she was cross-examined about it.
Nope. Objection sustained and not allowed into evidence.
quote:
I don't think the actual document was necessary at that point.
What?
Never uttered the words “I’d like to offer, file, and introduce?” quote:
And all this whining about Trump's legal expert...I can't imagine a judge EVER allowing a legal expert to testify in a criminal trial.
Experts testify in criminal trials all the time. Including Trump’s trial. Good Lord.
This post was edited on 5/31/24 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 5/31/24 at 3:59 pm to Dday63
quote:
Merchan made some decisions I didn't understand.
Seriously? You can't see through Merchan's bias?
Posted on 6/1/24 at 4:52 am to Fat Bastard
Sue the coffee table rather than lit it beat you every day of your miserable life.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 4:53 am to BamaAtl
Your ignorance is on full display. Do continue to embarrass yourself for our amusement.
Posted on 6/1/24 at 4:55 am to BugAC
It’s worse than that. He wasn’t even on the list of the 24 active judges.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News