- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:45 am to FoTownBam
quote:
Uh yeah. Cartel runs that country. They also control a handful of politicians in the US. Looking at you Katie Hobbs
Don’t leave Ruben Gallego off the list. He’s not just controlled, he’s family
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:46 am to TBoy
quote:
It’s a confusing statement. Is she suggesting that the current lawsuit is that US gun makers are colluding with the cartels to arm them? And that if the cartels are classified as terrorists, then the claim will be that US gun makers are colluding with terrorists?
Not if you know the backstory.
Her current suit is coming before SCOTUS in March, and will most likely be ruled against for several reasons. Particularly since her suit amount of 10 billion makes the reasoning for the suit plainly obvious.
Collusion with terrorists is the only part of the litigation that has any prayer of having standing.
But the new addition to the case would cause an extension to the case, and cost Smith & Wesson more money in attorney fees.
This post was edited on 2/15/25 at 8:47 am
Posted on 2/15/25 at 8:57 am to Jcorye1
quote:
This is like suing Toyota because some jihad frick slaps a 50 cal on an old one shipped to the Middle East.
Her current suit is like that. And will fail.
But the part of them being terrorists, would actually play well for her hand. As it's a violation of federal law.
However, it would be on her part to prove it.
All they have to do is hold off on naming the cartels terrorists, until April. Her current supreme court case is in March.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:07 am to Wolfwireless
Thanks for the info Wolf. I remember that one now. I guess this would just be another suit to tie our courts up, when the other loses. Though how this made it thru the court system to scotus would be interesting to understand.
Proof the actual gun manufacturers are making their guns for cartel use would be interesting. I'm sure there's a custom build of a gold plated gun they'll try to use.
Seems if this approach is allowed to make it through the court system car manufacturers, rope makers, knife makers, etc, essentially any tool that has been used to do cartel business will be on the docket.
I'm sure Trump knows the "tax the money wires" approach. Don't know why that has been thrown out yet, hope it's a card to thru when needed and not another reason, but the melt when that's tossed out there will be golden.
Proof the actual gun manufacturers are making their guns for cartel use would be interesting. I'm sure there's a custom build of a gold plated gun they'll try to use.
Seems if this approach is allowed to make it through the court system car manufacturers, rope makers, knife makers, etc, essentially any tool that has been used to do cartel business will be on the docket.
I'm sure Trump knows the "tax the money wires" approach. Don't know why that has been thrown out yet, hope it's a card to thru when needed and not another reason, but the melt when that's tossed out there will be golden.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:19 am to HagaDaga
quote:
Thanks for the info Wolf.
I second this.
However, if there’s anything we can do from here to impede the flow of guns to the cartels, we should do it. Mexican cartels don’t have second amendment rights.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:27 am to BCreed1
Has Trump mentioned anything about taxing remittance? I haven't heard anything.
Needs to be done.
Needs to be done.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:43 am to HagaDaga
quote:
Thanks for the info Wolf. I remember that one now. I guess this would just be another suit to tie our courts up, when the other loses. Though how this made it thru the court system to scotus would be interesting to understand.
No problem Haga
I had to look this up, because my memory with dates is really bad.
Their suit was dismissed outright, in 22. Then they found a sympathetic court in AntiGun Massachusetts that brought the case back up.
quote:
For years, Mexico has been trying to sue American gun manufacturers, claiming the firearms they produce are smuggled across the U.S.-Mexico border each year. And Mexico says these guns are arming drug cartels and fueling violence across the country. Well, a lower court dismissed the case in 2022, but yesterday a federal appeals court in Boston ruled the lawsuit can go forward. Joining me now is Mexico's co-counsel, Jonathan Lowy. He's also founder and president of Global Action on Gun Violence. Jonathan Lowy, welcome.
In other words, they have been getting help from antigunners here in the US.
https://www.npr.org/2024/01/23/1226406579/mexicos-lawsuit-against-american-gun-manufacturers-is-revived-by-appeals-court
This post was edited on 2/15/25 at 9:46 am
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:46 am to TBoy
quote:
However, if there’s anything we can do from here to impede the flow of guns to the cartels, we should do it. Mexican cartels don’t have second amendment rights.
They do when in America. Being illegals or not. I don't like the "illegals have the same rights as Americans" argument, but nothing stops them from getting them on our side. Taking them over into MX is on the Mexicans to stop though, so instead of using us, she should up that security. Though doubt she'll touch it.
I also have no doubt the Chinese are helping arm them. We need proof of Chinese/Russian made equipment to toss back in her face.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:52 am to Wolfwireless
quote:
Their suit was dismissed outright, in 22. Then they found a sympathetic court in AntiGun Massachusetts that brought the case back up.
quote:
In other words, they have been getting help from antigunners here in the US.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:53 am to HagaDaga
quote:
Proof the actual gun manufacturers are making their guns for cartel use would be interesting. I'm sure there's a custom build of a gold plated gun they'll try to use.
Seems if this approach is allowed to make it through the court system car manufacturers, rope makers, knife makers, etc, essentially any tool that has been used to do cartel business will be on the docket.
I think she's going to have a hard time proving it, if she adds this to the suit. I'm gonna laugh tho, if it turns out that S&W has military contracts with Mexico's military.
So.... It's your military contracts supplying cartels with legally purchased arms? Hmmmmm.
I can't think of the name of it, but weapon and ammo manufacturers have immunity. The only thing they can be sued for are dangerously defective equipment, and violation of laws.
Hahaha this Mexican hemp rope burned the heck out of my hands! I'm suing the manufacturer for ten billion!
Posted on 2/15/25 at 9:55 am to Wolfwireless
quote:
In other words, they have been getting help from antigunners here in the
Which is likely an NGO or recipient of USAID
They’re on life support
This post was edited on 2/15/25 at 9:56 am
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:04 am to TBoy
quote:
I second this.
However, if there’s anything we can do from here to impede the flow of guns to the cartels, we should do it. Mexican cartels don’t have second amendment rights.
Indeed. And I think that we also need to investigate what other countries and groups, are supplying them.
And then throw that card down on the negotiation table with those countries.
Agreed. They don't. Or any of the other constitutional protections.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:08 am to Wolfwireless
I've always said that we need to tax all that Western Union money flowing back in to Mexico and South America. I bet it would pay for the wall and then some.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:15 am to BCreed1
How fricked up is your country when you defend drug cartels? They are terror groups. They chop heads off and hang dead bodies SPECIFICALLY for terror. I get that she thinks once they are listed as terrorist groups then Trump will violate the sovereignty of Mexico to go after them.
Hey Puppet President. If you can't or won't clean up your country, then maybe it is time for some sovereignty violation. How many mayors need to butchered in your country before you send the military after the cartels? 60 politicians murdered by cartels.
I wouldn't want to be a family member or friend of Trump if he does go after them because once a war starts, they will go after his family and friends.
I just don't understand how anyone would come out and threaten corporations from the US because actual terror groups might be put on a terror list.
Clearly that chick is president because the cartels allowed her to be president.
Hey Puppet President. If you can't or won't clean up your country, then maybe it is time for some sovereignty violation. How many mayors need to butchered in your country before you send the military after the cartels? 60 politicians murdered by cartels.
I wouldn't want to be a family member or friend of Trump if he does go after them because once a war starts, they will go after his family and friends.
I just don't understand how anyone would come out and threaten corporations from the US because actual terror groups might be put on a terror list.
Clearly that chick is president because the cartels allowed her to be president.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:27 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Funny, the Cartels only exist due to US regulation and market demand for drugs.
They’d still exist in other capacities if drugs were legal.
The cartel has other business ventures, not to mention even legitimate businesses to wash money.
They make billions off of human smuggling.
If we legalized or decriminalized drugs, they would still provide drugs on the black market for a cheaper price to turn a profit and avoid taxes for the consumer.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:30 am to Deuces
quote:
They’d still exist in other capacities if drugs were legal.
Drugs or Guns, nothing else is that lucrative.
We created the cartels through regulation. We've spent over a trillion fighting it and it will never work.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:35 am to BCreed1
Sorry but we are going to keep our domestic gun industry healthy
Can you imagine if it shut down and over the course of yours we lost people with the skills to do that?
We would be totally dependent on foreign gun makers.
We should never be dependent on foreign gun makers, pharmaceutical companies, or high-tech components.
Can you imagine if it shut down and over the course of yours we lost people with the skills to do that?
We would be totally dependent on foreign gun makers.
We should never be dependent on foreign gun makers, pharmaceutical companies, or high-tech components.
Posted on 2/15/25 at 10:43 am to HagaDaga
quote:
They do when in America. Being illegals or not
actually there is a circuit split on whether an illegal alien is part of "the people" if the answer is no then they do not have 2nd amendment rights.the 5th and 8th circuit rules against the illegals while the 2nd 9th and 10th have ruled that they are part of the people.
note I have way oversimplified the dispute.
Popular
Back to top


1




