- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Memphis Family Struggling to Overcome Poverty
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:29 am to beebefootballfan
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:29 am to beebefootballfan
quote:
“I wish I had made better choices, but now, it is here, and it is time to move forward,” said Patricia.
She moves forward by making sure her children learn from her mistakes by going to college, getting good jobs and waiting to have kids until marriage.
“I am glad I have seven kids. I am a proud mother. They are not in jail. I am not a grandmother,” said Patricia.
As her children piled up their plates and sat down to eat, they took a moment to pray for a future, because in that moment, their worries and problems seem insignificant. They are thankful for what they have.
“I don’t believe money is happiness. Happiness to me is seeing my children laugh,” said Patricia.
Since we interviewed the family, Patricia landed the part-time job, but it wasn’t enough hours. She plans on going back to college this fall to finish her associate degree and find a job where she no longer must rely on government assistance.
Bunch of heartless shits in this thread and I typically don't say that about criticism of people on welfare.
“But we had to celebrate and be glad, because this brother of yours was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.”
Posted on 5/18/14 at 7:56 am to HempHead
quote:
I certainly agree that she doesn't have a moral claim on your (or my) money, but I would be more willing to help her out (voluntarily) than some other examples we are exposed to.
This.
I have no problem whatsoever doing what I can for somebody who's at least willing to make the fricking effort.
It's the ones sitting on their asses and prioritizing the free cash toward luxuries that I have a problem with.
This post was edited on 5/18/14 at 7:57 am
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:00 am to beebefootballfan
If you have 7 kids with no paternal support and you have no skills that are in demand, you will probably end up in poverty.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:00 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
God's plan for you is not to your liking?
God's plan is for the government to take the money I work hard for and redistribute it to those who won't?
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:12 am to Godfather1
I wonder why the question was not asked, answered, where are the seven kids daddies.
I saw nothing in her home and automobile that indicated that she was living in poverty.
I saw nothing in her home and automobile that indicated that she was living in poverty.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:15 am to MunichBengal
quote:
We have it tough
I wonder how tough you really have it.
quote:
I'd be much happier paying taxes in Sweden or Norway or Denmark where people look like me, think like me, have my culture more or less, have my work ethic and interests.
Then by all means, take your dumb arse over there.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:45 am to real
quote:
Kids= mo money that's Democratic Party math.
7 blessings from above, I am told.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:48 am to bencoleman
This is why UN Agenda 21 is vital. Agenda 21 Section I: Social and Economic Dimensions is directed toward combating poverty, especially in developing countries, changing consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more sustainable population, and sustainable settlement in decision making.
Our inner-cities may not be developing countries, but they consist of underdeveloped cultures with the same irresponsible reproductive and consumption habits.
I still can't understand why fiscal and social conservatives fear sustainability and rational environmental policies which aim to reduce the dependency problem on a global scale. If people cannot find the personal responsibility to live within their means, then it's going to require IGO intervention to address these concerns.
Our inner-cities may not be developing countries, but they consist of underdeveloped cultures with the same irresponsible reproductive and consumption habits.
I still can't understand why fiscal and social conservatives fear sustainability and rational environmental policies which aim to reduce the dependency problem on a global scale. If people cannot find the personal responsibility to live within their means, then it's going to require IGO intervention to address these concerns.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 8:57 am to lsutothetop
quote:
“I don’t believe money is happiness. Happiness to me is seeing my children laugh,” said Patricia.
Off topic ... I agree with her on this.
There are some well-off married folks out there with 2 kids (boy and girl) and a nice golden retriever ... and they are miserable as frick.
On topic ... I don't have a big problem with welfare ... so long as those on it ... take the attitude of this lady and try to realize mistakes and do something to STOP THE CYCLE... or at least reduce the numbers.
But, in general overall, I don't see much to stop the cycle ... I only see more participants...in big part, thanks to the Food Stamp POTUS that we have now.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 9:02 am to MunichBengal
quote:
I'd be much happier paying taxes in Sweden or Norway or Denmark where people look like me, think like me, have my culture more or less, have my work ethic and interests.
Well, what are you waiting for?
Posted on 5/18/14 at 9:06 am to beebefootballfan
Yea the $7 kids thing is bad. But it seems as if she is putting forth the effort so that she nor will her kids be welfare recipients in the near future. Its not ideal, but I'd rather have my money going to her because it seems like it will be temporary as opposed to some life long welfare recipients.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 9:19 am to NoNameNeeded
Know how I know you are insane? The fact that you are pushing agenda 21. A21 would be the end of life as we know it. Sustainability leaves the door open for complete totalitarian rule. It would left up to them as to what was sustainable and what was not. The United States would be better off to throw the UN out of this country.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 9:19 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
I'd rather have my money going to her because it seems like it will be temporary as opposed to some life long welfare recipients
Which was the original intent of the program. It was supposed to be a temporary safety net, not a hammock. Unfortunately, in many cases, that is exactly what it has become.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 9:31 am to beebefootballfan
Tally:
1. Adult child #1 > 18
2. Adult child #2 > 18
3. Adult child #3 > 18
4. High school senior ... assume at least 17
5. 15 year old
6. 13 year old
7. 2 year old
At no point during 2+ decades ... could Sandra Fluke not have shown up and shared some of her free birth control ?
In the near future ... perhaps the full grown adults can get full-time jobs and perhaps they can move towards self-sufficiency.
Also ... how many "fathers" are involved in this ordeal? Is it one dad ... who has past away? Is it 7 different sperm donors, all of which are dead, MIA, or deadbeats?
1. Adult child #1 > 18
2. Adult child #2 > 18
3. Adult child #3 > 18
4. High school senior ... assume at least 17
5. 15 year old
6. 13 year old
7. 2 year old
At no point during 2+ decades ... could Sandra Fluke not have shown up and shared some of her free birth control ?
In the near future ... perhaps the full grown adults can get full-time jobs and perhaps they can move towards self-sufficiency.
Also ... how many "fathers" are involved in this ordeal? Is it one dad ... who has past away? Is it 7 different sperm donors, all of which are dead, MIA, or deadbeats?
Posted on 5/18/14 at 9:58 am to beebefootballfan
Compassionate conservatives seem to be in short supply around here.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 10:07 am to Layabout
quote:
Compassionate conservatives seem to be in short supply around here.
I most likely felt like shite for this woman after the first two. The last five have convinced me she's the perfect candidate for sterilization for further benefits.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 10:09 am to beebefootballfan
I've never met a welfare recipient who claimed they weren't trying to get off. I take her comments with a grain of salt. In 20 years she'll have 15 kids and will still be on welfare.
Posted on 5/18/14 at 10:13 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:This lady had 7 kids with no means of support. That's NOT a result of "the system". That's a result of her own actions.
This is why the welfare state in theory is not a bad idea. The system doesn't always work out for good, honest, responsible people.
I'm NOT saying she isn't a good, honest, (and now) responsible person, though. She appears to be. And likely deserves the charity of others.
But that's the problem with the "welfare state". It not only gives to those that are good, honest, and responsible--it gives to those that are lazy, dishonest, and irresponsible. "The state" cannot discern nor discriminate between the deserving and non-deserving.
Thus, the "welfare state" will always be ineffecient and ineffective in it's distribution of money. Like anything--we should apply our capital where it will be USEFUL.
This family would likely take anything given to them and turn it into an economically beneficial outcome. They are a good investment. But they will get the same investment from "the state" as their neighbor with 22" Rimz on his Caddy and only occasionally works to stay current on his benefits.
It's HORRIBLY unfair to families like this that the state regards them them the same as the leeches. I'd go so far as to label it cruel. But that's the heavy hand of government compared to the finessed and deft hand of private individuals for ya.
This post was edited on 5/18/14 at 10:14 am
Posted on 5/18/14 at 10:16 am to Layabout
quote:So are the taxpayers. What did they do to deserve the consequences?
They're blameless.
Popular
Back to top


1





