- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MEMO: HIC Releases the Memo. Link to memo inside
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:00 am to Cali 4 LSU
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:00 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
That's not Fox, that's Herridge's source. Her sources says use of dossier AT ALL isn't acceptable. Which makes sense.
Oh sauces. And yes it is acceptable cooborated by other evidence.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:00 am to GRTiger
quote:
Suddenly, collusion won't seem so bad anymore.
Dims on dim collusin...
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:00 am to reggielendale
Eli Lake says it's about to go up
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:00 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:I don't really get this. Obviously they didn't get what they paid for, but they were probably paying for legitimate information that they could use, so the legitimacy issue should be a major criticism, but why would someone paying for the information have any bearing on that?
Damn, they didn't tell FISA that dossier was paid for/funded by DNC/Hillary as oppo research when they submitted it for spying permission!
In other words, if Bernie Madoff had been running for office and his opponent paid someone for opposition research and that research discovered that he may be committing crimes, would that information only be valid to open an investigation if it wasn't paid for opposition research?
I'm just generally curious how the source necessarily means anything as opposed to the information itself and the legality of its collection.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 11:01 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:01 am to BestBanker
So far the information I have heard shouldn’t have had classified status in any way. I hate that they can hide behind “classified”.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 11:02 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:01 am to BestBanker
FOX says there are ZERO redactions. My MAGA boner is in full force.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:01 am to reggielendale
quote:Cling to it Mr. Marinovich.
And yes it is acceptable cooborated by other evidence.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:01 am to Jjdoc
We need to keep check House Intelligence Committee Website where it will be posted.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:02 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I don't really get this.
quote:
In other words,
melt. spin for your masters.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:02 am to BIGFOOD
quote:
what we're hearing now on the news is only an excerpt...more to come
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:02 am to CAD703X
That apocryphal Hillary quote about Trump hanging all of them from nooses appears to have gotten some context.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:02 am to Jjdoc
Where did they get that info from?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:05 am to upgrayedd
MAGA is on fox live right now.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:06 am to jcolding41
You guys are going to get burned. I tried to tell you.
Remember: from the FBI
quote:
With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it. As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.
Next, it will be the FBI's turn.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:06 am to jcolding41
Fox has exclusive excerpts that they are reporting on right now. So they don’t have the full memo yet just parts.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:07 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Where did they get that info from?
From the memo Devin Nunes and Donald Trump wrote.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:08 am to a want
I’m sure your boyfriend will comfort you in this time of need.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News