- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:25 pm to bamarep
quote:
quote:
bmy
Bless your heart
He is a disingenuous obtuse troll... a DOT maybe.
Does not believe most of what he posts, just takes satisfaction in the false belief he is smarter than others and to prove it he will espouse the least popular opinion by copying and pasting from other sources.
Pat him on the head and tell him good job little fella.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:28 pm to Dale51
quote:
And the evaluation (by who, exactly) was that there actually was an Urgent Concern to follow through with an investigation?? In the scheme of world and domestic events, what actually was the "urgent concern" as you understand it to be?? Serious question.
There was none. Any answer he gives is a lie.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:33 pm to bmy
Whenever I see an post with a bloated amount of text, I always check to make sure I am not wasting my time with BMY garbage.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:21 am to Mulat
Those 3 lawmakers are making fools of themselves. They don't even know the law.
The IC's version of the whistleblower statute has never required that the WB provide first hand information.
In fact, the instructions for filing an urgent concern complaint tell the whistleblower not to investigate on his own but rather to turn in the complaint so the IG can investigate.
McCarthy. Nunez and Jordan are demonstrating how clueless they are.
The IC's version of the whistleblower statute has never required that the WB provide first hand information.
In fact, the instructions for filing an urgent concern complaint tell the whistleblower not to investigate on his own but rather to turn in the complaint so the IG can investigate.
McCarthy. Nunez and Jordan are demonstrating how clueless they are.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 12:29 am to Mulat
What they are quoting from Are the instructions for filing the form NOT from the form itself.
The Federalist article That made all this up was a fraud and now the ICIG is going to embarrass these congressman for not having someone research it before they wrote this ridiculous letter.
The Federalist article That made all this up was a fraud and now the ICIG is going to embarrass these congressman for not having someone research it before they wrote this ridiculous letter.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 4:33 am to PanhandleTigah
quote:
And let’s not forget the ICIG’s legal counsel during his previous job was John Carlin. The final reviewer of the Woods Procedures during this he FISA review and Honest Bob Mueller’s former chief of staff. Another swamp creature exposed.
Yes Panhandle, Ive been saying this since it started. And the aftermath, his boss's boss sally yates was fired. His boss carlin quit, his replacement mccord quit....and this weasel slithers over to be the ICIG...and voila a year later is the keystone to this whole new debacle. He was just a citizen kane waiting for ......rosebud to be whispered.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 6:19 am to prplngldtigr
quote:
Please link the evidence to Trump making the arrangement “contingent” .
Before. After. During .
Any will suffice.
Thanks .
It's specifically referenced in the complaint. I would suggest starting there.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 6:24 am to bmy
quote:The form was not changed. Apparently ICIG compliance with the ICWPA statute was.
I wonder if they will inquire as to why it was also changed in 2018.
quote:
In order to find an urgent concern “credible,” the IC IG must be in possession of reliable, first-hand information. The IC IG cannot transmit information via the ICWPA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing. This includes information received from another person, such as when a fellow employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing. (Anyone with first-hand knowledge of the allegations may file a disclosure in writing directly with the IC IG.) Similarly, speculation about the existence of wrongdoing does not provide sufficient basis to meet the statutory requirements of the ICWPA. If you think wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than secondhand or unsubstantiated assertions, IC IG will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 7:39 am to bmy
quote:
It's specifically referenced in the complaint. I would suggest starting there.
Again, for the 50th time, the complaint was based on fabricated evidence, thus making the complaint null and void. Why can't you understand this?
Posted on 10/2/19 at 7:45 am to bmy
quote:
The complaint alleges that... Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"
Is this the democrat argument now? Biden admitting on video that he was withholding a billion dollars in aid unless they fired a prosecutor is A-OK, but Trump threatening to withhold a phone call is treason and impeachment-worthy?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News