- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mattis to NATO: Pay More or U.S. Will ‘Moderate Its Commitment’
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:42 am to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:42 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
So the new standard is meet all your promises in a month or you're a liar?
#gitmo
He knows! He's just hurting still
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:44 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Actually talking about that now. Everything can't be done in a day. Nice attempt though.
That's a lie. He stated TWO DAYS AGO that the embassy is staying in Tel Aviv.
And he just told Netanyahu to stop with settlements. Congrats, shill.
quote:
US President Donald Trump has responded to the Jordanian king’s request that the United States refrain from moving the US Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Arab media reported on Saturday.
Jerusalem Post, or is that FAKE NEWS
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 11:46 am
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:45 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
Member when he moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem?
I don't.
Member when he locked Clinton up?
I don't.
Member when he repealed Obamacare?
I don't.
Member when he had Mexico pay for a wall?
I don't.
Member when he had only the best people?
I don't?
Member when he stood up for religious freedom?
I don't.
Member when he got rid of Obama's executive actions?
I don't.
Member when he fixed the tax code?
I don't.
Member when he removed DACA?
I don't.
He's been in office LESS THAN A MONTH. There's still plenty of time for him to follow through on those promises before re-election
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:45 am to Tiger Prawn
Bhoy is upset that the church didn't get their amnesty candidate
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:48 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
That's a lie.
No it's not. He stated clearly they are working on that, and doing so very carefully.
quote:
And he just told Netanyahu to stop with settlements.
He did. What's your problem with that? Not sure what that has to do with the topic.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:48 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
He's been in office LESS THAN A MONTH. There's still plenty of time for him to follow through on those promises before re-election
These are promises he's backed away from.
C.f.: Keeping the anti-Catholic executive order that Obama signed in place because Ivanka and the homosexuals love it; The embassy story above; the countless statements regarding not prosecuting Clinton; Flynn yesterday; etc.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:48 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:48 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
Member when he moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem?
In the works.
Member when he locked Clinton up?
She pleaded with her life and he threw her a bone. This is on Clinton.
Member when he repealed Obamacare?
You don't know how Congress works. It's on its way out the door as we speak.
Member when he had Mexico pay for a wall?
They are. Either up front now or on the backside.
Member when he had only the best people?
Not only the best, but so good the media has to spend countless hours trying to destroy them as opposed to the 5 minutes it would take for an average person.
Member when he stood up for religious freedom?
You should read the news. His executive order should be announced soon on this.
Member when he got rid of Obama's executive actions?
See: his first three weeks in office.
Member when he fixed the tax code?
Once again, you don't know how laws are passed much less obviously how to change the tax code. It's coming later this year.
.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:49 am to NIH
quote:
Bhoy is upset that the church didn't get their amnesty candidate
Trump just said a couple of days ago that he wants the Gang of Eight bill resurrected. How is that not amnesty?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:49 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Who could be against this?
Terrorists.
And people that support them.
(Liberals)
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:49 am to NIH
quote:
Bhoy is upset
perpetually.
Most flat brim hat wearers are angry folks. People who use Bhoy wear flat brim hats as a rule.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:50 am to EvrybodysAllAmerican
That and conservatives with a fetish for bloated military spending.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:52 am to TN Bhoy
You may want to read your own link.
"we will see what happens" code for.... it's time to deal.
quote:
“I am thinking about the embassy, I am studying the embassy [issue], and we will see what happens. The embassy is not an easy decision. It has obviously been out there for many, many years, and nobody has wanted to make that decision. I’m thinking about it very seriously, and we will see what happens,” T
"we will see what happens" code for.... it's time to deal.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:52 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
Member when he moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem?
I don't.
Member when he locked Clinton up?
I don't.
Member when he repealed Obamacare?
I don't.
Member when he had Mexico pay for a wall?
I don't.
Member when he had only the best people?
I don't?
Member when he stood up for religious freedom?
I don't.
Member when he got rid of Obama's executive actions?
I don't.
Member when he fixed the tax code?
I don't.
Member when he removed DACA?
I don't.
Oh man, one month and he's not kept every promise? Impeach!
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:53 am to Jjdoc
quote:
"we will see what happens" code for.... it's time to deal.
Code for: it's not moving
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:56 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
quote:
"we will see what happens" code for.... it's time to deal.
Code for: it's not moving
1- I don't care about that embassy. Get a clue.
2- He uses everything from a stand point of making a deal! EVERYTHING
Posted on 2/15/17 at 11:57 am to Jjdoc
NATO military spending or more specific their lack of funding has to be addressed and handled. We have our $2 billion Arleigh Burke class destroyers providing ballistic missile protection to our European allies meanwhile they won't spend the require 2% GDP which is the minimum accepted amount to provide and maintain a viable force. Recently the British have cut spending that now they don't even carry anti ship missiles on their sub force.
Popular
Back to top



0







