- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie is evidently going after Trump. He's big mad over Iran.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How should we respond when Russia attacks a country trying to join the EU and become our ally? How should we respond when Iraq tries to get WMDs? How would we respond to a civil war breaking out in Libya trying to overthrow its longtime dictator, threatening to destabilize a dangerous region? How do we respond to ISIL running amuck in the ME?
In which one of your straw men was the US being attacked directly?
It’s also hilarious that you pretend the Muslims don’t want to kill us all. They literally chant “Death to America” and “kill all infidels”
By the way, that includes you.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 7:34 am
1
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
expanding valuable countries into the West is good for America.
As in adding Ukraine to NATO, and at the risk to starting WW3, I think not.
quote:
Just like having key naval travel areas for trade safe, and expanding the safe areas for more trade
Then tell the UK to not cut our nose off despite our face by ceding the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. That’s of our concern. Ukraine is not.
quote:
Just like Houthis shooting missiles at our ships to disrupt economic activity in key areas.
Agreed
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:36 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
As in adding Ukraine to NATO, and at the risk to starting WW3, I think not.
Yeah he doesn’t know his history, clearly.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:37 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Yeah he doesn’t know his history, clearly.
None of them do. But they are all good with atacking Russia byt muh Houtis are off limits
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:39 am to Paddyshack
quote:
In which one of your straw men was the US being attacked directly?
The "US" isn't being attacked directly in any of them
Our ships abroad=/= "the US"
That's you stretching things to justify your 180 on policy. Anyone with a little bit of dishonesty and creativity can do that (see: my examples)
This is the problem without having principles and relying on just malleable broad concepts with no definitions. It gives you plenty of wiggle room to be a complete hypocrite and then turn around and pretend that you're not.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Why the hell do we care one way or the other if Ukraine joins Europe? It's not even remotely the same thing as what is occurring with the Houthis. Stop being a limp wristed sycophant of the globalist. I'd tell you to get laid more often but I don't support gay sex. You prove yet again that you are a retard.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:40 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
and at the risk to starting WW3, I think not.
Attacking Iran has the same risk
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:40 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Yeah he doesn’t know his history, clearly.
Attacking Iran has the same risk of starting world War 3
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:41 am to SDVTiger
quote:
byt muh Houtis are off limits
We are discussing attacking Iran
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We are discussing attacking Iran
So the Houtis are not connected to Iran?
Good grief
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Attacking Iran has the same risk of starting world War 3
I wonder if they weighed the risked of attacking US with state-sponsored terrorists
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:47 am to SDVTiger
quote:
So the Houtis are not connected to Iran?
Reminds me of GWB telling us how Iraq was connected to AQ back in 2003.
You can always stretch it out to justify war if you have no set principles to fall back on.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
So is that a yes or no?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Our ships abroad=/= "the US"
Are you serious or are you just pretending to be dumb?
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 7:52 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:50 am to SDVTiger
quote:
So is that a yes or no?
Russia is connected to both. Can we bomb them in Ukraine now?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:51 am to SlowFlowPro
Its very simple question. Yes or No?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:51 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Are you serious or are just pretending to be dumb?
Typical melt to having bad comparisons pointed out as bad.
And I already covered that in that very post
quote:
That's you stretching things to justify your 180 on policy. Anyone with a little bit of dishonesty and creativity can do that (see: my examples)
This is the problem without having principles and relying on just malleable broad concepts with no definitions. It gives you plenty of wiggle room to be a complete hypocrite and then turn around and pretend that you're not.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:52 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Its very simple question. Yes or No?
Yes. That's largely irrelevant to the prior position of MAGA. Everyone is connected to everyone these days.
As I said, Russia is connected to both Iran and the Houthis. Can we attack Russia in Russia now?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:53 am to SlowFlowPro
That's the point I was just about to make. Every attack in the ME conclusively gets labeled "Iran-backed" by the media -- and the Biden admin. seemed to do this, too.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 7:54 am to Bunk Moreland
Page 10 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News