- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:22 am to rumproast
Bull. There is no doubt the election was compromised. Take off the blinders. 
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:25 am to texridder
quote:
Does that sound credible to you?
Really?
Why don't you ask Arturo D'Elia? If this were all made up the wouldn't be jailing are killing off all of those involved.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:35 am to texridder
quote:
Maybe because Zack is president of a company called Nations in Action, which lists a P.O Box at a UPS store on Clark Road in Sarasota, Fla. as its main address. Pretty impressive, isn't it?
Lol, I send my state tax forms to a fricking PO Box.
Plenty of companies including utilities have a payment address that is a PO Box.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:41 am to udtiger
quote:
Certainly more credible that multiple states (all where Trump had substantial leads) all "shut down" at the same time and then miraculously come up with piles of votes to flip those states.
shhh - he still thinks that a lot of the WI suspected illegal votes happened in pro-Trump precincts - as if that is a rational to disprove there were irregularities in the WI election.
don't wake him up.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:45 am to dgnx6
I believe we had fraud. I believe we had foreign interference. I believe Dems are corrupt. I believe RINOs are corrupt. I believe the media is corrupt.
I don't believe this video and Maria Zack's "testimony" is credible. Bragging in your initial first slide that you've known 10,000 politicians and attended government affairs conferences are not witness qualifying facts. Also, she is presenting over-emotionally to a group of obviously disinterested persons. Interesting video but one that ultimately, will join the heaping pile of other meaningless "earth shattering" videos.
I don't believe this video and Maria Zack's "testimony" is credible. Bragging in your initial first slide that you've known 10,000 politicians and attended government affairs conferences are not witness qualifying facts. Also, she is presenting over-emotionally to a group of obviously disinterested persons. Interesting video but one that ultimately, will join the heaping pile of other meaningless "earth shattering" videos.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:46 am to texridder
quote:
Zack is convinced that foreign powers used a military satellite in Italy to change votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden on election night. Does that sound credible to you? Really?
Just change Biden with Clinton and Italy with Russia and every dem would believe this.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:51 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Also, she is presenting over-emotionally to a group of obviously disinterested persons.
Well her life is in danger so that just might, just maybe could explain the emotion.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:00 am to Sasquatch45
Bookmarked. Will watch tonight.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:15 am to texridder
quote:
Maybe because Zack is president of a company called Nations in Action, which lists a P.O Box at a UPS store on Clark Road in Sarasota, Fla. as its main address. Pretty impressive, isn't it?
Zack is well-known and credible across the corporate/government affairs/external relations universe. She lead Philip Morris and Altria at one point. That is not a low profile job.
This post was edited on 3/23/22 at 8:16 am
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:17 am to Bearcat90
I think we've found the q team.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:26 am to omegaman66
quote:So she says.
Well her life is in danger so that just might, just maybe could explain the emotion.
Look, she may be spot on, and a thousand more just like her say the same, but until an interested Congress and a media that believes in freedom materializes out of the muck of the biased swamp currently in place, then clinging to small pieces of debris, like this video, won't keep the argument that the election was stolen afloat.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 11:25 am to Sasquatch45
Well let’s see what the Durham investigation brings into the mix . And hopefully no one dies from mysteries illness .
You know how it goes with these control freaks .
All options are on the table
You know how it goes with these control freaks .
All options are on the table
Posted on 3/23/22 at 10:03 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Considering you could see votes changing on live TV, yes it does
Did you think what was posted on live tv were official results? What made you think that they were?
Posted on 3/26/22 at 5:01 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
shhh - he still thinks that a lot of the WI suspected illegal votes happened in pro-Trump precincts - as if that is a rational to disprove there were irregularities in the WI election.
That's not what I said. You are confused.
You, and most Trumpers, assume that each and every questionable vote that was cast was 100% for Biden. In fact, they never even consider that a portion of those votes went to Trump.
The same thing happened in Wisconsin relating to the "indefinitely confined" vote. Trumpers assume that every "indefinitely confined" vote was cast for Biden and therefore there were enough of these votes to swing the Wisconsin vote to Trump.
There is no way to know which way any "indefinitely confined" voter actually voted.
I posted the information about who carried the counties the "indefinitely confined" votes were cast in to show that it's just as reasonable to estimate that Trump received as many of these votes as Biden.
That's all it was meant to show.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:54 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
Zack is well-known and credible across the corporate/government affairs/external relations universe. She lead Philip Morris and Altria at one point. That is not a low profile job.
That may be true, but the affidavit she posted as being Arturo D'Elia's affidavit wherein D'Elia admitted what he had done in Italy concerning the 2020 election, is not even D'Elia's affidavit.
The affidavit is made and signed by Prof Alfio D’Urso.
In the affidavit D'Urso is stating information that he says was given to him by third parties.
The first paragraph of the affidavit reads as follows:
quote:
I, Prof Alfio D’Urso, Advocate/Lawyer, of Via Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95131 Italy, do hereby Provide the following Affidavit of Facts as conveyed in Several Meetings with a High Level Army Security Services Official:
It isn't D'Elia admitting anything. It's not even his affidavit.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:09 pm to texridder
quote:
That's not what I said. You are confused.
quote:It didn't. It was not meant to show your weaseling floundering lying, which are obvious. It was stupid which is why you were considering it.
That's all it was meant to show.
PIECE OF SHITE
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:17 pm to texridder
quote:
In the affidavit D'Urso is stating information that he says was given to him by third parties.
That meets the threshold for an appointed Special Counsel and a huge FBI investigation.
Right?
Posted on 3/28/22 at 3:55 pm to Flats
quote:
That meets the threshold for an appointed Special Counsel and a huge FBI investigation.
Useless, off-topic response.
You got anything to say about the affidavit not being signed by the person who is claimed to have signed it?
Posted on 3/28/22 at 10:16 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
I posted the information about who carried the counties the "indefinitely confined" votes were cast in to show that it's just as reasonable to estimate that Trump received as many of these votes as Biden.
That's all it was meant to show.
quote:Were you confounded by what I posted? Which one was it? Was it, or was it not, meant to show my weaseling, etc. ?
It didn't. It was not [SIC] meant to show your weaseling floundering lying, which are obvious.
quote:Why don't you explain exactly why what I posted was 'stupid' ?
It was stupid which is why you were considering it.
Of course, you won't even try to do that because you know better than to risk being embarrassed by getting drawn into a substantive discussion.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News