- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man kills Convicted Child Molester with Moose Antler
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:57 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Apparently, you do not understand that “minimum security“ and “low security“ are two separate categories of prison/incarceration.
You're to the PT board what the Black Night was in Monty Python.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 9:57 am
Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:57 am to SOSFAN
Well, though impassioned and possibly impaired Fathers taking the law into their own hands is highly problematic, by the same token it is a wakeup call to the 'groomers' and stalker pedos that believe that they can hide behind the currently sympathetic 'Woke' application of law.
The responses per our Board backs this up. If the Law don't protect our children from what we BELIEVE is perverse and evil ('Grooming' at the fore), the 'law' at some point, will become useless, nullified and justice will go to the people who have real (the souls of their children) skin in the game.
F with the kids and find out. That goes for Biden and the Woke ideological activists, pedos and perverts who seek to normalize pernicious behavior/belief. They'd better drop that crap. Keep it in the bedroom and out of the schools. Or find out.
The responses per our Board backs this up. If the Law don't protect our children from what we BELIEVE is perverse and evil ('Grooming' at the fore), the 'law' at some point, will become useless, nullified and justice will go to the people who have real (the souls of their children) skin in the game.
F with the kids and find out. That goes for Biden and the Woke ideological activists, pedos and perverts who seek to normalize pernicious behavior/belief. They'd better drop that crap. Keep it in the bedroom and out of the schools. Or find out.

Posted on 3/12/23 at 9:57 am to SOSFAN
quote:and you are what Forrest Gump is to high intelligence.
You're to the PT board what the Black Night was in Monty Python.
(do I need to reference the specific movie? I feel then perhaps I should)
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 9:59 am
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Apparently, you do not understand that “minimum security“ and “low security“ are two separate categories of prison.
Apparently you don't know the difference between prison and prisoner classifications but keep trying to move those goalpost.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:04 am to PeleofAnalytics
The smart move is to just castrate the guy
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:15 am to Gus007
quote:
Man of the year award should be in his future. I wish more parents had his instincts to protect the young and innocent.
He needs to just put on a wig and be woman of the year. And everyone will cheer on this brave woman for protecting her kids.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:20 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
with the kids and find out. That goes for Biden and the Woke ideological activists, pedos and perverts who seek to normalize pernicious behavior/belief. They'd better drop that crap. Keep it in the bedroom and out of the schools. Or find out.
They will keep pushing this agenda until normal citizens rise up and revolt. Then the government will take even more freedom away due to " keeping us safe". They are counting on us standing up for our rights.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Apparently, you do not understand that “minimum security“ and “low security“
Medium security is appropriate for violent offenders unless they need max.
Do rapists normally get put in min or low security as normal practice?
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:25 am to RTRinTampa
quote:
This thread has convinced me that you are the biggest and most successful troll on SECR.
Nope, he's a true believer on child sexuality issues.
He's soft on those who rape children because he identifies with them.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:28 am to jonnyanony
quote:
The smart move is to just castrate the guy
Doesn't stop child predators unfortunately.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:30 am to SOSFAN
quote:
They will keep pushing this agenda until normal citizens rise up and revolt. Then the government will take even more freedom away due to " keeping us safe". They are counting on us standing up for our rights.
Sobering, but true, SOS.
They are pushing for economic collapse so that they can take over the (Digital) money, allocation and access to the process of "buy and sell". If they get that, then they don't need to confront people and take their guns and freedom. We'll have to give them both, or starve.
It's coming.

Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:30 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Do rapists normally get put in min or low security as normal practice?
Sorry I used the actual law to defeat his argument. He went to his normal routine of Denying that's what he meant, then moving of goalposts followed up by calling me names and ending with his logging off.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:31 am to SOSFAN
quote:
He went to his normal routine of Denying that's what he meant
Of course. He usually says no one understands him and we're just dumb for it.
Usually if your message is universally misunderstood, the problem is on the person presenting the message. He needs to look inward on this one.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 6:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:No, you twit, it is not REMOTELY what you said.
He believes child rapists should be given minimum security because they will be bullied in hard core prison.quote:Exactly what I said.
No, you fricking dishonest moron, I think that that incarceration in low security prisons is appropriate because they are low risk for escape, and low security prisons cost about 1/3 per prisoner the sum that is required to keep the same prisoner in an (unnecessary) maximum security prison.
Because you clearly do not read and understand Standard American English, I have boldfaced one significant difference, and underscored another one.
So, first you lied in summarizing my earlier positions both (a) about the security level that I was suggesting and then (b) about the reason that I had suggested incarceration in a lower-security environment. And THEN you lied and pretended that your summary was exactly the same as my restatement in this thread.
I am still trying to find something about which you did NOT lie.
This post was edited on 3/12/23 at 6:03 pm
Popular
Back to top
