- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man dead after refusing to show police ID
Posted on 2/27/14 at 7:40 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 2/27/14 at 7:40 pm to CptBengal
quote:
according to the police statement he stepped pay the game warden and took a "fighting stance"
I realize you say that in jest, but it really disturbs me in the manner that these goons conduct themselves.
Police use the word "combative" and think it absolves them of any responsibility for their actions.
Of course, being "combative" is at police discretion, and we know police are not the smartest of folks so I will make the (logical) assumption that most citizens are not being combative.
0
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:18 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Wrong
Please enlighten me with your absolute truth and knowledge on this topic please
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:30 pm to volhound
quote:
Please enlighten me with your absolute truth and knowledge on this topic please
Judging from your posts it would be a waste of time.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:36 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Judging from your posts it would be a waste of time.
Okie dokie oh wise internet chat board grand puba. This case like many others will drag on for months, truths lies and all the in between will come out. Will the real facts and truth come out in the end? I would hope so, but like most things our gov't and judicial system touches it will be all sorts of fricked up by the end.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:39 pm to volhound
I've become convinced that if a cop just shot someone walking down the street peacefully that some of the pigs and pig lovers around here would still find a way to defend it.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:41 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Alahunter
And to you, please find the closest sewage treatment faculty and go drown in shite.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:42 pm to OMLandshark
quote:He took a combative stance!
I've become convinced that if a cop just shot someone walking down the street peacefully that some of the pigs and pig lovers around here would still find a way to defend it.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:44 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Alahunter
And to you, please find the closest sewage treatment faculty and go drown in shite.
I think he feels a sizable portion of the population deserve to get roughed up.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:49 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I've become convinced that if a cop just shot someone walking down the street peacefully that some of the pigs and pig lovers around here would still find a way to defend it.
"Law enforcement" is like a fraternity. They have each others backs until something may come back on them, then they snitch like the pussies they are.
The fact that these thugs are here to "protect and serve" is laughable.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:54 pm to Sevendust912
quote:Well, considering that the Courts ruled that you have absolutely zero right to police protection and the police don't have to protect you if they don't want to.
The fact that these thugs are here to "protect and serve" is laughable.
quote:
Warren v. District of Columbia[1] (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held police do not have a duty to provide police services to individuals, even if a dispatcher promises help to be on the way, except when police develop a special duty to particular individuals.
It's hilarious that people still believe a cop's job is to protect and serve.
That phrase should be rewritten.
"Harass and Collect" sounds better.
This post was edited on 2/27/14 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:55 pm to volhound
quote:
This case like many others will drag on for months, truths lies and all the in between will come out. Will the real facts and truth come out in the end? I
Are you ok?
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:01 pm to Scruffy
quote:
"Harass and Collect" sounds better.
Yeah, I called the cops last week, and while it worked out in the end, the pig fricking harassed the frick out of me and reminded me on why I never get the pigs involved. I'll just copy this from my post earlier this week:
quote:
I should have listened to you, wmr. Decided to bar hop to determine which places I liked. Went into Stir, and I can say safely that it is the single worst bar on planet Earth.
I walk in and get IDed by the bouncer. I'm not drunk at that point and the frickhead says it's a fake, because they've been seeing a bunch of Mississippi fake IDs. I tell the fat frick that I have 18 more proofs on me that I am who I say I am, including a corporate card, an Ole Miss alumni card, proofs of insurance, and a social security card. He asks to see them, so I hand him my wallet with all those proofs in them. The piece of shite then says that I stole it and is confiscating it as well. I tell him to go frick himself and anything he asks me about any of those forms of ID I can answer.
He then asks me my birthday and then my age, and I tell him I was born in late 1987 and was 26, but he says "Dude, you can't even keep your story straight. Let's do some basic math here. 2014 minus 1987 equals 27." I respond with "Yeah if I was born in February or before, you fricking dumbass." He then says "Dude, we're letting you off light now, but what you don't understand is we're about to call the cops and have you arrested for theft." My response, "No man, what you don't understand is I'm about to call the cops and have you arrested for stealing my wallet."
Anyway the cops come in, and I find out that the pigs in Fayetteville aren't much better than they are in Oxford. He agrees with the bouncers that there isn't conclusive proof in my wallet that I am who I say I am, despite having working credit cards and one of which being corporate. He then says if I don't produce it, I'm about to be arrested. The pig then has a revelation that can prove to them I am who I am: pull up my Facebook profile and that if my birthday is on there, that would be proof I wasn't lying. Pull it up, the cop lets me go, and the bouncers say that they'll buy me a drink. I reluctantly thank the cop for assisting the situation, but turn to the bouncers, give them the finger, and tell them to go frick themselves.
So yeah, these are the type of people I run into pretty consistently. I am serious when I say that I trust gangsters more than I trust the pigs, and would be friends with one of them before a pig.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:07 pm to OMLandshark
quote:meh, . . . . . what . . . . did . . . . you . . . . . expect?
an Ole Miss alumni card
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:10 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
This dude I went to WVU with has an eerily similar story. But yeah, police are far from credible and are never to be trusted.
They aren't smart, because if they were they wouldn't be police officers. It is disgusting and disgraceful how these "officers" conduct themselves when dealing with tax paying and law abiding citizens.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:20 pm to volhound
quote:Granted, no one here has "absolute truth and knowledge on this topic" . . . . yet.
Please enlighten me with your absolute truth and knowledge on this topic please
There are a couple of facts we know:
(1) The police were not there because of Luis Rodriguez. He was innocent.
(2) Luis Rodriguez died as a result of the police being there. He was dead.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:22 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
(1) The police were not there because of Luis Rodriguez. He was innocent.
(2) Luis Rodriguez died as a result of the police being there. He was dead.
I would like to add that Mr. Rodriguez was unarmed. Other than that, this is a great post.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:22 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Granted, no one here has "absolute truth and knowledge on this topic" . . . . yet.
There are a couple of facts we know:
(1) The police were not there because of Luis Rodriguez. He was innocent.
(2) Luis Rodriguez died as a result of the police being there. He was dead.
Excellent. I cannot understand how this is hard to understand.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:24 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:But the police stated he took a combative stance.
There are a couple of facts we know: (1) The police were not there because of Luis Rodriguez. He was innocent. (2) Luis Rodriguez died as a result of the police being there. He was dead.
A COMBATIVE STANCE!!
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:25 pm to NC_Tigah
There are a couple of facts we know:
(1) The police were not there because of Luis Rodriguez. He was innocent.
(2) Luis Rodriguez died as a result of the police being there. He was dead.
(1) The police were not there because of Luis Rodriguez. He was innocent.
(2) Luis Rodriguez died as a result of the police being there. He was dead.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:26 pm to NC_Tigah
Brother, I want you to never forget, because this is what happens when there's a monopoly of force and violence.
Page 27 of 58
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News