- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:55 pm to LEOPOLD2
quote:
you seem dishonest
The trio of BoarEd, bamadontcare, and duckbill can be impressive on this front
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:55 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Yes —If a child is being exploited; I don’t think the distinction between mad daddy and run of the mill pervert matters.
I refuse to accept that you're actually this stupid. Rather I think you're just being intentionally obtuse to avoid giving any ground in a freaking internet discussion which is fricking sad.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:56 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Did they refute the news report of the AGs conference?
quote:
He says many of them were human trafficking victims and suffered abuse, neglect and exploitation.
Doesn't say much. You're lumping everyone into the "exploitation" camp and have no evidence to support it other than this comment speaking generally with no details.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:56 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Ed’s — yes. Did they refute the news report of the AGs conference
Where in the video was the clear testimonial evidence? It should be easy to point out cuz the video was pretty short
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:57 pm to LEOPOLD2
quote:
Rather I think you're just being intentionally obtuse to avoid giving any ground in a freaking internet discussion which is fricking sad.
Correct
They've set up the rules that any questioning of this narrative means you're an enabler/supporter of child sex trafficking, which paints them into insane corners.
They're about to start devolving to ad homs and likely claiming you're suspect and probably rape children. Just wait.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:57 pm to LEOPOLD2
quote:
you seem dishonest
You seem to have an insatiable desire to
negate enforcing penalty’s to stop child trafficking.
I want to stop it and hopefully use executions to
stop it.
You seem to support it. Which is a strange position
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:58 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
You seem to have an insatiable desire to
negate enforcing penalty’s to stop child trafficking.
I want to stop it and hopefully use executions to
stop it.
You seem to support it. Which is a strange position
THE NEXT POST MY GOD
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:58 pm to dukkbill
It's pretty frickin telling that this guy will stay in this thread until it goes to like 50 pages if we keep it active. it is a literal compulsion for him.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:59 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
You seem to have an insatiable desire to
negate enforcing penalty’s to stop child trafficking
LOL. Point to any sentence I have written that supports this ridiculous assertion
People who engage in child trafficking can all be buried under the fricking concrete for all I care while still alive and if we can figure out how to have fire going at the same time I support that too! That's why I fricking can't stand liars who manipulate information for fricking clicks. They do nothing to help the cause
Posted on 8/30/26 at 9:59 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It's pretty frickin telling that this guy will stay in this thread until it goes to like 50 pages if we keep it active. it is a literal compulsion for him.
quote:
When y'all stop being emotional-irrational, believing obvious bullshite, and projecting dishonesty, I'll stop replying to these things.
Now tell us about these children in chains in the video
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:00 pm to LEOPOLD2
quote:
That's why I fricking can't stand liars who manipulate information for fricking clicks. They do nothing to help the cause
Correct.
They also have no interest in having a real discussion about what would really help. They demand we project the fantastical instead, which does very little, if anything.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think a parent violating a court visitation order is "exploiting" the child?
I think “indecent assault” is exploiting the child, which is exactly what two individuals have been charged with up to this point
You were the one fixated on Ed talking about exploitation alleging that he was injecting without evidence when just a simple review would indicate this was the statement about the AG
Are you just focused on the one person who was charged with custodial interference? If so then there doesn’t appear to be enough evidence to charge him with anything else yet
I’m glad Florida was able to rescue 163 children. It’s a great achievement. I’m glad however the many that were victims of neglect abuse and exploitation are receiving treatment and have been rescued
Punishments for custodial interference are secondary to the children’s well being and far too premature to litigate in this forum based on known facts. Moreover it appears ultra vires to the thread unless there are some specific facts that can add to the existing reports
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:10 pm to dukkbill
quote:
I think “indecent assault” is exploiting the child, which is exactly what two individuals have been charged with up to this point
Okay. I 100% agree. So that's two out of 163.
quote:one? The video in the original post doesn't break down how many of any of the categories there were. Where are you getting your numbers?
Are you just focused on the one person who was charged with custodial interference? If so then there doesn’t appear to be enough evidence to charge him with anything else yet
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:11 pm to dukkbill
quote:
That was linked in my post. LINK. There it is again
Well at least that's not a shite link so I will read it
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:12 pm to roadGator
quote:
The first 6-10 posts already accomplished that by making it about an individual poster that has nothing to do with the topic.
Its really fricking sad. These sick, attention seeking idiots take what should be a positive story about kids being rescued and somehow turn it into a left v. right angle. Its just pathetic.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:13 pm to lsusteve1
Go on. Something not factual.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:15 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Are you just focused on the one person who was charged with custodial interference?
Only 3 were charged. He's 33% of the criminal charges
I can just as easily ask you if you're focused on the 2 charged with indecent assault. It's not statistically any different (out of 163)
quote:
Punishments for custodial interference are secondary to the children’s well being and far too premature to litigate in this forum based on known facts.
Why not apply this standard universally?
Posted on 8/30/26 at 10:15 pm to dukkbill
quote:
That was linked in my post. LINK. There it is again
Okay I read that link but it's still got the same problem. It's not breaking down the categories in any way whatsoever. You guys seem to think that wanting to know that answer equals not giving a shite about the children who were actually exploited but that's just complete fricking nonsense. I just want to know if they're using the 163 number to sensationalize or if it vaguely resembles the actual number of worst cases? Because no. In no fricking universe is Daddy or Mommy disagreeing with the court on child custody equal to child trafficking for sexual exploitation no matter how hard you try to stretch
Page 15 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News