Started By
Message

re: Louis CK called Trump an insane bigot and part of the problem

Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23252 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

that were both more credible and worse in nature


Please elaborate. How is the denied allegation more "credible" than one freely admitted by all parties?
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18407 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

but clearly it was an awkward situation,


Years later, like before yesterday and way after 2001. This isn’t new, he apologized to the women when they first said something years later. He didn’t find it awkward until they said something after the fact.

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86192 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

he apologized to the women when they first said something years later. He didn’t find it awkward until they said something after the fact.


He apologized before today

Posted by Quarterite
The Lower Quarter
Member since Oct 2016
959 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Louis CK called Trump an insane bigot and part of the problem


So that means Louis CK is kinda sleazy and a good judge of character.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

men are not alone in this act


What's next?

"Sarah Silverman asked me to watch her didddle herself".

Well.. maybe that might be a bad example...
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

He didn’t find it awkward until they said something after the fact.




Umm... seriously?
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18407 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

He apologized before today


Correct and it’s only a big deal now because #metoo
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 1:55 pm
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86192 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

t’s onky a big deal now because #metoo


well yeah

I'm not sure what you are arguing with me about

Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
15081 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

What exactly did Louis CK do wrong?


Why are you asking us when you can read his own words?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23265 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

J think what he was doing was weird but not wrong. Isn’t consent the sorta magic term


None of the accusers gave consent. One told him no and he stopped. Two others (at the same time) told him no, and he did it anyway.

If you don't think that's wrong, then there's something really wrong with you.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Trump was "caught" with accusations that were both more credible a


more credible? CK admitted the stories were true. You are an idiot.
Posted by BluegrassMiracle
Member since Oct 2017
38 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Please elaborate. How is the denied allegation more "credible" than one freely admitted by all parties?



OP says CK only admitted to it because he was "caught". He was only "caught" in that women told their stories to the press and provided contemporaneous accounts from other people that they told at the time.

Trump was accused of worse behavior by more women and with more contemporaneous accounts than CK had been. If CK was "caught", Trump was also, and doubly so.

The fact is, even before CK released his statement, everyone with half a brain knew that the accusations were true. Innocent people don't get accused by multiple independent women each with similar stories and contemporaneous accounts of people they told about it. The standard of proof is higher for a criminal court, as it should be, but anyone with half a brain and half a heart would not be able to continue supporting CK after so many credible accusations, regardless of if he fessed up or not. Just the same, no one with a half a brain or half a heart could possibly vote for Trump given what we know about him even though, instead of coming clean, his response was instead to threaten lawsuits that he never filed and instead, when the women sued him, argue that he's immune to lawsuits as president.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:29 pm to
Know how I know you aren't a lawyer?
Posted by BluegrassMiracle
Member since Oct 2017
38 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

more credible? CK admitted the stories were true. You are an idiot.


You're an idiot if you don't understand OP was arguing that CK only came clean because he was "caught". The allegations against Trump were more credible and more well documented than the ones against CK, so if CK was caught, so was Trump. It's that simple.

But then, we all already knew you were angry, raging idiot. No surprise there.
Posted by BluegrassMiracle
Member since Oct 2017
38 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Know how I know you aren't a lawyer?



I'm not even making a legal argument.

Know how I know you're an idiot?
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17960 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:31 pm to
The shite he did was along time ago correct? what in the hell does that have to do with Trump? he acts as if his actions and Trumps actions are mutually exclusive....
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:32 pm to
Youve allegedly been a member for one month. How would you know this:


quote:

We already knew you were angry, raging idiot.


First, it never gets old when someone makes a grammatical error while calling someone else an idiot.

Second, it is clear you are an alter

Third, you are not very bright.

Fourth, you cannot get more credible than proven. Admission is proof. You don't have proof for any of the claims against Trump. So, no...they cannot be called more credible.

Fifth, did I mention you aren't very bright?
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17960 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:36 pm to
a lot of alters on this board now.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19485 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

credible


Are you sure you know the definition of this word?
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18407 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Two others (at the same time) told him no, and he did it anyway.

If you don't think that's wrong, then there's something really wrong with you.


Wrong. They did not tell him no, liar.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram