Started By
Message
locked post

looking for the graphic of large spike in dem votes in 2020 compared to 2016 and 2024

Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:52 am
Posted by doliss
Northern VA
Member since Sep 2009
1026 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:52 am
Heard about this initially on a rogan podcast clip and few people talking about this graphic but can't seem to locate it anywhere online. I figure this would be the place to know exactly what i'm talking about. Can anyone provide a link or a pic of it?
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 10:58 am
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
24891 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:53 am to
I want that graphic too.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
86696 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:53 am to
I think the one you're referring to is for '16, 20' and 24' with a median line going through the last 3 EC's displaying that '20 was a YUGE anomaly
Posted by doliss
Northern VA
Member since Sep 2009
1026 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:59 am to
sounds about right, was something along the lines of the numbers being pretty consistent with the exception of the "most honest election ever" in 2020
Posted by Deathvalley71
Dallas
Member since Oct 2004
909 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:00 am to
Posted by Deathvalley71
Dallas
Member since Oct 2004
909 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:00 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 11:02 am
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:01 am to
This is something I tossed together 2 days after the election based on 10 minutes of Wikipedia numbers. Election totals at that point, so take it for what its worth.

Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
51316 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:02 am to
There was a large spike in 2024 in WI after midnight for Dim candidate Tammy Baldwin, I would like that graph.
Posted by Augustus516
Member since Oct 2024
126 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:02 am to
I’ll be honest with you:

The dems nominated a woman…a black woman at that for President.

That’s dumb and double down dum when they nominated Hillary.

I would not vote for a republican woman just saying
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 11:03 am
Posted by BillyGibbons
St. Somewhere
Member since Mar 2020
724 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:03 am to


I’m pretty sure this is what you want…
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 11:04 am
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:04 am to


I love the labels and the information about this. Not to mention it was 2 days after the election, and it doesn't include another 6 days of counting. Why do people post stuff like this knowing it's incomplete?
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:05 am to
So we start the Y axis at 50 Million instead of 0. Jesus yall are so easily manipulated by data
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
7301 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:05 am to
How many days should it take for some of these dipshit run states to count?
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:06 am to
Do you understand how to compare data? I doubt it
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
7301 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:08 am to
You spent much time doing peer reviews for published literature? Bc I have you fricking moron. Now answer my actual question instead of giving some bullshite response that is attempting to look intelligent
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I love the labels and the information about this. Not to mention it was 2 days after the election, and it doesn't include another 6 days of counting. Why do people post stuff like this knowing it's incomplete?



Because I clearly stated exactly what it was and I had it on my desktop from 5 days ago when i did it. Not to mention 2 days after election should be enough time for a modern country to have an approximate vote count.

Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:20 am to
Here's a quick updated version from current Wikipedia counts. This includes a running average trendline



We're still 8 million votes shy of 2020 at this juncture.
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:24 am to
Then you understand that it took this long last time to count also so you can either compare the results at the same time 2 days later or compare all of them once they are complete. That is why I am not answering your question that has no bearing on the data that you are trying to present when it is incomplete and misleading.

I said nothing about how long it takes to count. I actually don't understand why every state isn't using machines like Louisiana where it doesn't take so damn long to count, but most of this board thinks we should continue hand counting paper ballots. So you tell me how long it should take to count, but know you can't have you cake and eat it too. Hand counting of paper ballots with security checks will take time.
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:27 am to
Because you wanted the incomplete, misleading, incorrect chart out there online so people will be confused and have their mind made up when the real data comes in?
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:29 am to
Now let's do this chart for each swing state that you think were "stolen" in 2020 to see which states cheated?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram