- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Listen Live: Supreme Court hears voting rights arguments
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:25 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:25 am to cajunangelle
The liberal judge (Keagan, or however you spell that douche's name) claims that lazy people who choose not to vote because they can't walk to their mailboxes are disenfranchised.
What a dumb, wicked bitch.
What a dumb, wicked bitch.
This post was edited on 3/2/21 at 10:27 am
1
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:42 am to BiteMe2020
quote:they are there for ballot harvesting. and frick Roberts for even allowing this nonsense to be heard.
The liberal judge (Keagan, or however you spell that douche's name) claims that lazy people who choose not to vote because they can't walk to their mailboxes are disenfranchised.
What a dumb, wicked bitch.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:55 am to cajunangelle
Do we really want people who are so f*cking stupid that they can't find their correct voting precinct to be voting at all?
Just like the most common sense voter integrity measure of all -- Voter I.D. laws -- the Ignorant Latina and her DNC komrades seem to be arguing that blacks are way too stupid, lazy, and ignorant to figure out the simple task of showing up at the right f*cking precinct. Therefore, according to these SCUMBAGS, we need as much ballot harvesting as possible even though everyone with an I.Q. above single digits KNOWS FOR A F*CKING FACT that this leads to MASSIVE F*CKING VOTER FRAUD for the Dims.
Just like the most common sense voter integrity measure of all -- Voter I.D. laws -- the Ignorant Latina and her DNC komrades seem to be arguing that blacks are way too stupid, lazy, and ignorant to figure out the simple task of showing up at the right f*cking precinct. Therefore, according to these SCUMBAGS, we need as much ballot harvesting as possible even though everyone with an I.Q. above single digits KNOWS FOR A F*CKING FACT that this leads to MASSIVE F*CKING VOTER FRAUD for the Dims.
This post was edited on 3/2/21 at 10:59 am
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:56 am to cajunangelle
"Justice" Keagan is chronically ignoring the fact that many liberal voters are simply lazy fricks.
"I don't have a job, and neither does my 32 year-old son. I can't make it to the polls on time."
Seriously???????
The lawyers should point out that much of this is ridiculous racist laziness. Nothing more.
She's a complete immoral douchebag degenerate liberal sack of shite.
A disproportionally lower amount of minority votes could easily be explained by several reasons:
Voting rules favor one race over another (unlikely).
Voting rules are biased against people who are too fricking lazy to do the minimum to legally vote.
The latter is the more obvious answer, because that's the reasoning the plaintiffs in the case actually gave, lol.
Our Supreme Court is fricked hopelessly.
"I don't have a job, and neither does my 32 year-old son. I can't make it to the polls on time."
Seriously???????
The lawyers should point out that much of this is ridiculous racist laziness. Nothing more.
She's a complete immoral douchebag degenerate liberal sack of shite.
A disproportionally lower amount of minority votes could easily be explained by several reasons:
Voting rules favor one race over another (unlikely).
Voting rules are biased against people who are too fricking lazy to do the minimum to legally vote.
The latter is the more obvious answer, because that's the reasoning the plaintiffs in the case actually gave, lol.
Our Supreme Court is fricked hopelessly.
This post was edited on 3/2/21 at 11:02 am
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:57 am to MMauler
what happened they are done?
when should we expect Roberts to essentially rubber stamp mail in voting because muh covid?
when should we expect Roberts to essentially rubber stamp mail in voting because muh covid?
Posted on 3/2/21 at 10:58 am to cajunangelle
What is up?
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:05 am to themunch
It is done till tomorrow at 10 am I think as stated on Cspan stream.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:09 am to themunch
quote:
It is done till tomorrow at 10 am I think as stated on Cspan stream.
done already today?
They work on Biden time
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:09 am to cajunangelle
quote:
I want reparations for my Trump pot farm NOW, go suck an egg if you do not agree.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:20 am to cajunangelle
Loyola Law school 1973
if the law is on your side argue the law
if the facts are on your side argue the facts
if neither the facts nor the law are on your side , just argue
Supreme Court reaffirms that logic 2021
Maybe, the supremes stayed out of Trumps contest because of the shear number of issues made it to complex to rationalize. Maybe they will take up one issue at a time like ballot harvesting.
the law is not a physical science but rather a social science
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:21 am to Trevaylin
quote:
Maybe, the supremes stayed out of Trumps contest because of the shear number of issues made it to complex to rationalize. Maybe they will take up one issue at a time like ballot harvesting.
the law is not a physical science but rather a social science
The simpler explanation is that the Supreme Court is filled with a majority cowards, who are afraid to tell states that the "election commission" cannot pass voter laws, because the Constitution fricking says the frick so.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:23 am to Trevaylin
quote:
Loyola Law school 1973
if the law is on your side argue the law
if the facts are on your side argue the facts
if neither the facts nor the law are on your side , just argue
Well played.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:25 am to gthog61
quote:
done already today?
They work on Biden time
Lunch, siesta, cocktail hour.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 11:29 am to Lsuismyfav
quote:
Lsuismyfav
Anything to contribute to the conversation? Anything at all?
Posted on 3/2/21 at 1:02 pm to freeasareeze
But libs will go on and on about muh court cases, as if these partisan, biased decisions equal brute fact
No evidence of election fraud was EVER going to make it into a court case
No evidence of election fraud was EVER going to make it into a court case
Posted on 3/2/21 at 1:16 pm to GurleyGirl
quote:Nonsense. Of course the Left understand that these things can happen and that they DO happen on occasion, though they may argue regarding the frequency.
What none of the liberals will admit: mail in voting is not secure. Mail is stolen out of thousands of mail boxes every day. Identity theft is common. There is zero reliable voter identification associated with mail in ballots. Children can easily fill out ballots for in home elderly parents who have no clue about the candidates let alone the issues.
The list goes on and on.
The ACTUAL difference across is aisle is ideological.
The Left is simply willing to accept a greater risk of "fraud" in order to facilitate easier access to the franchise, whereas the Right is willing to tighten access to the franchise in order to lessen the risk of "fraud."
Asserting that the decisions-makers on BOTH sides do not even ACKNOWLEDGE these competing motivations is simplistic, partisan demagoguery.
quote:I tend to agree.
With the notable exception of military voting and other valid absentee ballot necessities, there's is no justification for mail in ballots.
This post was edited on 3/2/21 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 3/2/21 at 1:18 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
What. White folks (and a few Asians) only get to live near post offices?
What's even worse, in whites-only neighborhoods, we have these things called mailboxes, where the post office personnel actually bring and collect mail directly from our front yard. Seriously, it's the life.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 1:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The ACTUAL difference across is aisle is ideological.
The Left is simply willing to accept a greater risk of "fraud" in order to facilitate easier access to the franchise, whereas the Right is willing to tighten access to the franchise in order to lessen the risk of "fraud."
This 100%. Access to the ballot and ballot security are necessarily two things which are at tension with each other. If both sides could acknowledge this, then a compromise could be found.
Posted on 3/2/21 at 1:19 pm to MMauler
quote:This is MY point.
Do we really want people who are so f*cking stupid that they can't find their correct voting precinct to be voting at all?
I support most laws and proposals which tighten access to the franchise, but I am open and honest about my motivation.
I don't pretend to have some high-minded goal related to the "integrity of the voting process."
I readily admit that I don't want to see lazy, stupid and uninformed people voting.
This post was edited on 3/2/21 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 3/2/21 at 1:21 pm to Trevaylin
quote:Is this a corollary of the old standby:
if the law is on your side argue the law
if the facts are on your side argue the facts
if neither the facts nor the law are on your side , just argue
quote:
If the facts are on your side, pound the facts.
If the law is on your side, pound the law.
If neither is on your side, pound the table.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News