- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIBERALs ONLY = Can you articulate a reason for NOT = Build That Wall
Posted on 9/13/18 at 6:39 am to alphaandomega
Posted on 9/13/18 at 6:39 am to alphaandomega
Thanks to everyone who contributed - I noted far less (altho not zero) shite posts than I expected.
This seems to be among the most well-thought out posts - and pretty much represents my own views on the topic (except for the instant execution opinion)
I did not see any substantive reasons for why the wall should not be built.
I would have liked to see substantive discussion about eminent domain and access to the river. These are the only objections I have any real sympathy for. I'd have like to see someone round out the details of those objections.
Objections based on cost are laughable = my opinion. Anyone who thinks the USA would not save more than 25B in one year in the reduced impact on our schools, and medical, prison, police services will need to provide more than their opinion to convince me.
Objections based on "Mexico will pay for that wall" are merely campaign quibbling. It is a stupid statement when left unexplained. I didn't like the statement because it gave too much instant rejection based on its incompleteness. But it is correct - Mexico will 'pay' for the cost in tariffs, reduced (to them) trade advantages, cost of caring for their own citizens rather than off loading that cost to us, etc. It was still a stupid campaign slogan - but every slogan in any typical campaign is stupid. "You can keep your plan - you can keep your doctor - costs will be less' is the most egregious in recent memory.
Attributing the problems associated with illegal aliens to VISA overstays needs more development. I could be convinced with proper substantiation. MY OPINION = visa overstays are not the ones clogging our schools, prisons, medical services. Those able to get a valid visa are not the ones joining street gangs, committing mayhem, overloading our schools, clogging our prisons, working for cheap labor picking strawberries, etc. Again - I COULD BE CONVINCED to change my mind on this, but it takes more than someone's opinion to do it.
I know - this thread has pretty much played itself out - I thought I'd be back earlier yesterday than I did and be able to respond more fully to each response. Scheduling at MDA was hours behind and got back too late (too tired) to respond last night.
This is only to avoid the charge of 'post shite and never return' which I abhor. No need to respond to me with slogans and crap - substantive input will be appreciated but anything else will be ignored.
Thanks again to all who responded.
quote:
The wall is not the only answer.
Yes I believe it should be built. But other things should be done as well.
I believe the military should be given the task of securing the border. If securing the border is not a task for them what is? It is more important than using them to impose our will on other countries. It is the most important facet of the defense of this nation.
Everify needs to be used for everyone. Including citizens. If someone enters legally and has a 24 month visa then at then end of 24 months their employer should not be allowed to pay them until they get a new visa. If a new visa is not granted then they must return to their home country. Failure to do so results in immediate deportation and their being listed with everify as not being eligible to ever enter the country again. When the visa expires then they also would be ineligible to obtain housing, wire money, and their drivers license would be suspended.
If caught inside the country after this deportation the penalty is death.
These combined actions would severely reduce the illegal invasion. They money spent on them getting EBT, housing, medical care, educating their children will easily pay for the program.
This seems to be among the most well-thought out posts - and pretty much represents my own views on the topic (except for the instant execution opinion)
I did not see any substantive reasons for why the wall should not be built.
I would have liked to see substantive discussion about eminent domain and access to the river. These are the only objections I have any real sympathy for. I'd have like to see someone round out the details of those objections.
Objections based on cost are laughable = my opinion. Anyone who thinks the USA would not save more than 25B in one year in the reduced impact on our schools, and medical, prison, police services will need to provide more than their opinion to convince me.
Objections based on "Mexico will pay for that wall" are merely campaign quibbling. It is a stupid statement when left unexplained. I didn't like the statement because it gave too much instant rejection based on its incompleteness. But it is correct - Mexico will 'pay' for the cost in tariffs, reduced (to them) trade advantages, cost of caring for their own citizens rather than off loading that cost to us, etc. It was still a stupid campaign slogan - but every slogan in any typical campaign is stupid. "You can keep your plan - you can keep your doctor - costs will be less' is the most egregious in recent memory.
Attributing the problems associated with illegal aliens to VISA overstays needs more development. I could be convinced with proper substantiation. MY OPINION = visa overstays are not the ones clogging our schools, prisons, medical services. Those able to get a valid visa are not the ones joining street gangs, committing mayhem, overloading our schools, clogging our prisons, working for cheap labor picking strawberries, etc. Again - I COULD BE CONVINCED to change my mind on this, but it takes more than someone's opinion to do it.
I know - this thread has pretty much played itself out - I thought I'd be back earlier yesterday than I did and be able to respond more fully to each response. Scheduling at MDA was hours behind and got back too late (too tired) to respond last night.
This is only to avoid the charge of 'post shite and never return' which I abhor. No need to respond to me with slogans and crap - substantive input will be appreciated but anything else will be ignored.
Thanks again to all who responded.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 7:04 am to ChineseBandit58
Because it isn’t necessary. How’s that? We do not have an immigration problem we have a problem with a SERIOUS lack of labor. The wall that is necessary consists of a wall of information, not concrete. We desperately need labor. I don’t know if you’ve heard but unemployment, for all practical purposes, is non existent. Illegal immigrants account for anywhere from 4-8% of the border states labor force, those rates lower as you travel away from the border. 66% of illegal immigrants are employed in jobs where they pay taxes. The rest are kids and those working under the table and those not working at all. There are vast regions of the US where there would be no reason for anything to be there other than creosote bushes if it weren’t for illegal immigrants.
The problem is they are illegal and thus subject to exploitation. We should make a wall of registration cards.....a visa that allows them to work in the US after a careful vetting process. The wall is an empty, meaningless monument to fear. The vast majority cross at legal border crossings and simply do not come back. Those who don’t are ignorant of the ease with which they could or not will8ng to wait in long lines.
All that said I am for the wall. It will be a huge pork filled boondoggle and in that there is money to be made. And it will ease the fear of those among us who are afraid of boogeyman. Build the damn thing already. And while we are at let’s force kids to say the Lord’s Prayer every morning before school. Again, it will assuage the fears of the ignorant and the insane and will do no harm....in fact it will serve the purpose of making prayer a state enforced burden and therefore as meaningful as speed limits. I am all in on a coma dying the ignorant, the insane and the frightened among us.....throw in some ancillary benefits like loads of pork to be consumed or rendering god an agent of the state and sign me right the frick up.
The problem is they are illegal and thus subject to exploitation. We should make a wall of registration cards.....a visa that allows them to work in the US after a careful vetting process. The wall is an empty, meaningless monument to fear. The vast majority cross at legal border crossings and simply do not come back. Those who don’t are ignorant of the ease with which they could or not will8ng to wait in long lines.
All that said I am for the wall. It will be a huge pork filled boondoggle and in that there is money to be made. And it will ease the fear of those among us who are afraid of boogeyman. Build the damn thing already. And while we are at let’s force kids to say the Lord’s Prayer every morning before school. Again, it will assuage the fears of the ignorant and the insane and will do no harm....in fact it will serve the purpose of making prayer a state enforced burden and therefore as meaningful as speed limits. I am all in on a coma dying the ignorant, the insane and the frightened among us.....throw in some ancillary benefits like loads of pork to be consumed or rendering god an agent of the state and sign me right the frick up.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 8:43 am to ChineseBandit58
There is no real policy to deal with the 11 or 15 million here already.
I suggest we go to felony for hiring any. Right now companies are fined. Paltry $$$. Instead, jail for those few at top of food chain.
Hiring manager
CFO
CEO
Felons in Leavenworth.
That would put a screeching halt to it if people went to jail if they hire one.
I suggest we go to felony for hiring any. Right now companies are fined. Paltry $$$. Instead, jail for those few at top of food chain.
Hiring manager
CFO
CEO
Felons in Leavenworth.
That would put a screeching halt to it if people went to jail if they hire one.
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 8:44 am
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:16 am to CelticDog
quote:
There is no real policy to deal with the 11 or 15 million here already.
I suggest we go to felony for hiring any. Right now companies are fined. Paltry $$$. Instead, jail for those few at top of food chain.
Hiring manager
CFO
CEO
Felons in Leavenworth.
That would put a screeching halt to it if people went to jail if they hire one.
I agree - this whole thing could have been avoided by proper policy enactment and enforcement decades ago.
Of those here illegally, I think they need to go back where they came from and make application to come in legally = apply for citizenship and wait for that process. If there are children born here, their parents need to decide whether they want their children with them, or turned over to some private individual who can fully support them - i.e. without welfare services.
Fines for those employers is one thing, but I think they should be sued for damages - they have created an ongoing disaster that has cost the US taxpayer billions upon billions of dollars. They need to be held responsible for that damage. And if they engaged in some sort of conspiracy to circumvent the laws, then criminal charges ought to be sought.
We must make it abundantly clear that any encouragement of illegal entry will be met with draconian sanctions on both the illegal alien, and anyone who aided or abetted their entry.
IF we had severe penalties - devoid of crocodile tears driving policy decisions - we could establish a safe border without the need for a physical barrier.
I think the option of fixing the problem with policy is the best possible idea - but the time for that idea gaining any traction has been lost for over 30 years.
I believe the only solution at this time is a physical barrier - augmented by whatever limp-waisted policy changes that can be forced thru a DEMOCRAT/GOPe filibuster in the Senate.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:56 am to Balloon Huffer
quote:
Roger this, it is simple math.
We spend more EVERY YEAR supporting illegals in our country than the wall will cost to build.
Pay for the cost ONE TIME, and reduce our spending costs for eternity. Even if Mexico does not pay a single dime, it will save our tax payers an unfathomable amount of money over time.
Please show your work on this. I bet you can't because you are just talking out your arse.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:59 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
We must make it abundantly clear that any encouragement of illegal entry will be met with draconian sanctions on both the illegal alien, and anyone who aided or abetted their entry.
and you ignore the 15 million already here?
Address my issue:
Make it a felony to hire an illegal.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 11:07 am to ChineseBandit58
A lot of good points already mentioned in here. Mine is simple:
If a border wall will be effective in keeping people OUT, would it not be equally effective keeping people IN? The IRS can already revoke passport privileges for owing back taxes. Between the TSA at the airports and a border wall, the gov't could effectively detain you for whatever reason they want.
If a border wall will be effective in keeping people OUT, would it not be equally effective keeping people IN? The IRS can already revoke passport privileges for owing back taxes. Between the TSA at the airports and a border wall, the gov't could effectively detain you for whatever reason they want.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 11:43 am to CelticDog
quote:
Make it a felony to hire an illegal.
I agree completely - I even expanded on it to recommend adding civil damage suits where the past laws are not strict enough.
Sadly, we cannot enact ex-post-facto laws - have to go by what's on the books now.
Going forward, the laws should be made much more robust.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 11:47 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
If a border wall will be effective in keeping people OUT, would it not be equally effective keeping people IN? The IRS can already revoke passport privileges for owing back taxes. Between the TSA at the airports and a border wall, the gov't could effectively detain you for whatever reason they want.
Our nation cannot survive without an honorable populace. If we as a people succumb to abject propaganda, then we deserve what we get. You are talking East Germany tryanny here.
Such an administration that would use a wall to keep people in would have no compunctions about building the wall - with slave labor if necessary.
So I don't think this is a valid objection to trying to solve current problems.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 11:50 am to Salmon
quote:
Lacks effectiveness - majority of illegal immigrants come over legally then stay illegally
True, but at least the o
quote:nes who come here legally and over stay are smart enough tp do that.
Destroys habitats
BS reason.
quote:Not so. Cheaper than providing welfare for millions of illegals.
Colossal waste of money to build/maintain
Posted on 9/13/18 at 11:52 am to ChineseBandit58
My friends say building the wall is racist to Mexicans.
They’re so ill informed on politics though like most liberals that that’s probably the extent of their excuse not to build it
They’re so ill informed on politics though like most liberals that that’s probably the extent of their excuse not to build it
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 11:54 am
Posted on 9/13/18 at 11:56 am to ChineseBandit58
I’m not against the concept of the Wall, I just don’t think it will be effective and a waste of taxpaying dollars. Most of them come by plane for instance, and the Wall won’t do shite about that.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 1:06 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Most of them come by plane
I keep hearing this - what is your source??
And if so, do you think people who come into the USA thru our airports are as apt to join street gangs, become drains on welfare, smuggle cocaine, act as coyotes for child traffickers, commit murder, overload our emergency medical services, etc??
Commonly accepted number of illegal aliens is around 11,000,000 people. Some estimates are triple that. Do you really think that 'most' of them flew in on airliners??? really??
quote:
I just don’t think it will be effective and a waste of taxpaying dollars
Effectivity is merely an opinion. My opinion is that it would be hugely effective in cutting down the kind of illegal alien who causes us the most problems. And as for cost - how many times have the DEMOCRATs implored = "If it saves just ONE life!!!!"
quote:
I’m not against the concept of the Wall,
I am against the concept of a wall - In fact I abhor the idea of a huge assed wall on out souther border - primarily for esthetic reasons and sympathy for the property rights of landowners on the border. I just don't think there is a workable alternative. DEMOCRATs have killed any effort at finding "common sense" solutions to the illegal alien problem.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 1:58 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
They money spent on them getting EBT, housing, medical care, educating their children will easily pay for the program.
I have constantly asked for CBAs for the wall, and never once has anyone ever considered including the effect on the GDP that these immigrants have.
Until I see a realistic CBA, I will be against this enormous government expenditure. I guess that's just the conservative in me.
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 9/13/18 at 2:01 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
If caught inside the country after this deportation the penalty is death.
Good lord, you Big Government types scare the shite out of me.
I believe there's an economic solution out there.
But I guess that's just the conservative in me.
Popular
Back to top

0







