- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Left-Wing News Hired Hitman Charged W/ 2nd Degree Murder Of Patriot
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:52 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I have run my own business for more than 20 years. In that time I have NEVER ONCE run a SecState search to determine whether someone’s franchise taxes were current. Why? Because it does not affect me in the slightest.
Is it the kind of business, where you have people walking around with firearms, and supposedly protecting the physical lives of others?
1
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:53 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Academically, it may be a marginally interesting question.
In a civil suit against Pinkerton, it could become a very interesting question.
quote:
But I have run my own business for more than 20 years.
Do you do contract work, and have you ever subbed or been a sub?
It's prudent to make sure your subs are qualified for the positions you're having them fill. In some circles, it's required.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:54 pm to Wolfhound45
Semantics...
I don't need to repeat myself like some here.
In my opinion as with others this was a highly trained marksman.
Everything he did was correct in what he did.
He instigated.
Fact.
He followed through with deadly force.
Fact.
He delivered a one shot one kill delivery.
Fact.
Investigation shows it was not a justified kill.
This isn't 1860.
I don't need to repeat myself like some here.
In my opinion as with others this was a highly trained marksman.
Everything he did was correct in what he did.
He instigated.
Fact.
He followed through with deadly force.
Fact.
He delivered a one shot one kill delivery.
Fact.
Investigation shows it was not a justified kill.
This isn't 1860.
This post was edited on 10/16/20 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:54 pm to auggie
quote:Of course not.
Is it the kind of business, where you have people walking around with firearms, and supposedly protecting the physical lives of others?
But even if it were, why would I care whether the business owner has become personally liable for corporate debts, which is the only significant non-tax ramification of letting a corporation lapse. Hell, I would PREFER to be able to look to both corporate and individual assets, if the bills do not get paid.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:58 pm to AggieHank86
Because in a situation such as Pinkerton's, the liability might not be the kind worked out in civil court.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 6:58 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Well, I thought we were discussing repercussions in the criminal case, but let’s look at that.
It's prudent to make sure your subs are qualified for the positions you're having them fill
If you are looking to see, for instance, whether their employees are properly trained, why do you care whether the owner has become personally liable by letting the corporate status lapse?
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:04 pm to AggieHank86
Conspiracy Hank, it seems like more and more people daily are coming under investigation here?
What IMO should those people be doing now from a legal standpoint?
What IMO should those people be doing now from a legal standpoint?
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If you are looking to see, for instance, whether their employees are properly trained, why do you care whether the owner has become personally liable by letting the corporate status lapse?
One thing I would say, if they have been careless enough to letting his own status lapse, he is probably neglecting other important aspects. Aspects that can lead to huge frick ups.
This post was edited on 10/16/20 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:07 pm to BarberitosDawg
quote:I apologize, but I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say/ask.
BarberitosDawg
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:09 pm to auggie
quote:OK. As a business partner, that MIGHT justify the effort of running a SecState search before you sign a contract.
One thing I would say, if they have been careless enough to letting his on status lapse, he is probably neglecting other important aspects. Aspects that can lead to huge frick ups.
But what relevance to this criminal case against a shareholder who did not pay his franchise tax?
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Well, I thought we were discussing repercussions in the criminal case
This thread is approaching 100 pages. I suspect we're discussing a wide range of issues related to this incident.
quote:
If you are looking to see, for instance, whether their employees are properly trained, why do you care whether the owner has become personally liable by letting the corporate status lapse?
It would make me wonder what else may have lapsed. Or was never there to lapse in the first place.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:13 pm to AggieHank86
Oh, is that your stance on clairvoyant?
It fits your narrative...
It fits your narrative...
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:13 pm to AggieHank86
quote:quote:
BarberitosDawg
I apologize, but I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say/ask.
He has no idea what he's trying to say, either.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
But what relevance to this criminal case against a shareholder who did not pay his franchise tax?
I suppose it would be very similar, to a drug that was improperly tested, that killed somebody.
Excuse me if my spelling and sentences go to hell, I just finished my 3rd shot of whiskey. I haven't been drinking much lately, until tonight.
This post was edited on 10/16/20 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:15 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Another idiot .
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:25 pm to BarberitosDawg
I'm here for either of you two arse turds to answer too.
I'm guessing neither of you have LEO or combat experience because of you myopic comment's.
So let's here the savants comments on what the 9news and the murderer's upcoming legal stance should be?
Let's here your take as more and more of this conspiracy becomes justified by the hour?
Well...
I'm guessing neither of you have LEO or combat experience because of you myopic comment's.
So let's here the savants comments on what the 9news and the murderer's upcoming legal stance should be?
Let's here your take as more and more of this conspiracy becomes justified by the hour?
Well...
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:27 pm to BarberitosDawg
quote:Is this a game where we draw random, unrelated words by lot and try to form a sentence with them?
Oh, is that your stance on clairvoyant? It fits your narrative...
Ordinary apothecary scramble green. Quintessential piano reek semblance.
I am oddly intrigued.
This post was edited on 10/16/20 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:30 pm to BarberitosDawg
I had to be away from home for a while today. Have there been any new developments since early this morning?
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:31 pm to AggieHank86
I understand Hank you think you are better than the American people...
I just don't think it's true.
God Bless you man.
I just don't think it's true.
God Bless you man.
Posted on 10/16/20 at 7:31 pm to BarberitosDawg
quote:
I'm guessing neither of you have LEO or combat experience because of you myopic comment's.
Guess again.
Page 95 of 99
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News