- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers representing the Capitol insurrectionists build damning case against Trump
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:32 pm to LSUBALLER
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:32 pm to LSUBALLER
quote:
Nobody is taking Trump to court, want to bet? They would be exposed. If they use the arrested people’s statements, Trump would have the right to show what he said was not fabricated. It’s law.
He doesn’t have that right in someone else’s trial.
At his own trial of course.
This post was edited on 1/22/21 at 10:35 pm
2
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:35 pm to SammyTiger
Then how Mr Tiger is he exposed to more legal risk? What "Damning Case?"
Bring ANYTHING using that against him and he gets to defend himself.
Bring ANYTHING using that against him and he gets to defend himself.
This post was edited on 1/22/21 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:36 pm to SammyTiger
Bet they don’ t push a trial in Senate. Country is freaked up enough. Dems would really be pushing it to the edge. They know limitations. All a shite show. All for show.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:37 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Again, Trump wouldn’t be a party.
I would imagine it would open up the possibility of Trump suing each and every individual that implicated him.
I wonder if a defamation attorney is available for hire? If that were to pass, this could get interesting as Trump could defend his actions / speech on the 6th AND present evidence to support his claims that were stated in the speech. The next question is, would there be litigants from the 7 swing states involved, and if so, could Trump sue them in their home state?
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:40 pm to antibarner
quote:
Then how Mr Tiger is he exposed to more legal risk? What "Damning Case?"
I would say Trump in that case isn’t exposed to anything
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:40 pm to LSUBALLER
Sucks for the prosecutors who will have to present a case that insists the defendant(s) WEREN'T misled by misinformation, but in fact acted on their own accord. That's quite the conundrum for the prosecution. 
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:41 pm to LSUBALLER
No laches. No standing. The whole country watching. You mention that in his impeachment and he can defend himself.
The attorney he just hired specializes in ELECTION LAW. If Trump really does have the goods, they can't stop him, he can make his case before the American People, and the Dems can STFU and watch.
What will they say in rebuttal..nuh uh? The Goobers they have for impeachment managers are partisan hacks..not good
attorneys. They might be walking into a buzzsaw. You think Pencil Neck Schiff and that crew are convincing? Hell no.
The attorney he just hired specializes in ELECTION LAW. If Trump really does have the goods, they can't stop him, he can make his case before the American People, and the Dems can STFU and watch.
What will they say in rebuttal..nuh uh? The Goobers they have for impeachment managers are partisan hacks..not good
attorneys. They might be walking into a buzzsaw. You think Pencil Neck Schiff and that crew are convincing? Hell no.
This post was edited on 1/22/21 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:43 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Again, Trump wouldn’t be a party.
I get what you're saying, but isn't it true that if they cite him personally he could be called as a witness? Thanks for the post.
Which would mean, again, if they cite him personally, these cases will be dismissed. The end result is that the entire country is now fully aware the election fraud happened. Or Trump gets to submit evidence. Or he sues their arse off for defamation and it all gets dropped in the next trial.
This post was edited on 1/22/21 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:55 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Trump gets to lay out his evidence in court
I don't think anybody is actually afraid of this happening
I for one would love to see it
Posted on 1/22/21 at 10:58 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
I don't think anybody is actually afraid of this happening
If they weren't afraid of this happening they wouldn't have denied evidentiary hearings 50 times.
What a clown post.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:00 pm to antibarner
If Trump had the goods he would have put them out there
We know what he has.
We know what he has.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:02 pm to BoarEd
quote:
If they weren't afraid of this happening they wouldn't have denied evidentiary hearings 50 times.
You’re assuming the courts have a political agenda and not just standards you need to meet to bring a lawsuit.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:03 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
I don't think anybody is actually afraid of this happening
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:07 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Which would mean, again, if they cite him personally, these cases will be dismissed. The end result is that the entire country is now fully aware the election fraud happened. Or Trump gets to submit evidence. Or he sues their arse off for defamation and it all gets dropped in the next trial.
If the defense is booming Trump they won’t call him. They’re cute public statements and things like thatZ
So it would be up to the prosecution to call Trump.
Realistically I think The prosecutions stance is going to be: that’s not a defense. You committed a crime. Whether or not someone told you to do it doesn’t change that.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:09 pm to BoarEd
quote:
If they weren't afraid of this happening they wouldn't have denied evidentiary hearings 50 times.
Don't confuse fear with basic courtroom standards and competence
If he had a boom, we would have seen it. He didn't.
Welcome back from your lengthy hiatus
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:10 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
We know what he has.
You don’t know shite. Nobody does.
He may have nothing, or he may be waiting for an opportunity to present itself that is more favorable to him. To act as though you know makes you look foolish.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:10 pm to BoarEd
This all could have been avoided by transparent inquiries into the election results, but the left didn’t want that.
frick them.
frick them.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:12 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
He may have nothing, or he may be waiting for an opportunity to present itself that is more favorable to him. To act as though you know makes you look foolish.
At what point are you gonna give that up?
It’s been over 2 months.
Another person has been sworn into office.
What time Is more favorable?
This post was edited on 1/22/21 at 11:15 pm
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:14 pm to SammyTiger
Thanks again. So he sues for defamation? Damn. I hope we don't have to wait that long.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 11:17 pm to BoarEd
Please, please, please fricking do this.... Trump will evicerate these fricks and finally put all the evidence out there.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News