2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 8:32 am to doubleb
Posted on 10/24/26 at 8:32 am to doubleb
more good news. burn them all down...
EDIT: The page was taken down. It appears it was wrong info. Here is the correct strike info...
EDIT: The page was taken down. It appears it was wrong info. Here is the correct strike info...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 10/24/26 at 9:14 am
Posted on 10/24/26 at 8:45 am to cypher
It’s obvious, the refinery campaign is hurting Russia more and more; thus the efforts to make Ukraine stop it. Ukraine needs to keep it up.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 9:22 am to VolSquatch
quote:
Hacked Starlink's signal?
Just say you can't read and have zero technical knowledge. People who actually do figured it out a long time ago, but you admitting it would help the select few who still for some reason find you credible
JB would be proud of your attempt to spread disinformation.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This account posting from Moscow, was the first.
A swarm of others are just repeating what he said.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 9:36 am to VolSquatch
quote:
Hacked Starlink's signal?
quote:Whatever that word salad means... Just say you fell for this bot farm disinformation campaign like a complete chump. If the Ukrainians had hacked the Starlink signal, don't you think they would be now using the feed from the satellites set in orbit over Russia? So much for that "technical knowledge".
Just say you can't read and have zero technical knowledge. People who actually do figured it out a long time ago, but you admitting it would help the select few who still for some reason find you credible
Let's focus on demonstrable facts, moving on to this "Hacked Starlink" excuse, shall we? Musk's Russian bots working overtime and your confirmation bias is taking the bait.
Count the number of times the term "Hacked Starlink" appears in these posts. I'll help you out - it appears in every single one. Coincidence? Yet you posted this crap and now try to defend yourself. Figured it out yet?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
Posted on 10/24/26 at 9:37 am to cypher
quote:
JB would be proud of your attempt to spread disinformation.
Ya beat me to it.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 9:48 am to Coeur du Tigre
Here are today's less-subtle bots. Musk is panicking.
These go on for dozens and dozens of pages, trying to overwhelm the AI algorithm. And some fools still believe these to be real persons.
These go on for dozens and dozens of pages, trying to overwhelm the AI algorithm. And some fools still believe these to be real persons.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 9:54 am to Coeur du Tigre
Bots vs bots is not panicking. It's just the stupid machines in our world now.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 10:09 am to goatmilker
quote:Bot vs bots? Bots don't recognize other bots, they just repeat a single message endlessly.
Bots vs bots is not panicking.
And yeah, Musk is certainly panicking. If you think this is bad, let's wait and see if the 'Hacking Starlink' excuse is picked up by the White House.
If not, we'll see real panic coming out of Musk and his bot farms.
quote:No, machines are not stupid, people are.
It's just the stupid machines in our world now.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 10:22 am to Coeur du Tigre
Agree to disagree with all that. I'll wait to see actual evidence of the richest man on earth panicking.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 10:50 am to cypher
We can now add another OZON warehouse to the Omsky Kauchuk petrochemical plant in Omsk.
Omsky Kauchuk on the right, OZON on the left.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Omsky Kauchuk on the right, OZON on the left.
This post was edited on 10/24/26 at 11:00 am
Posted on 10/24/26 at 10:53 am to Coeur du Tigre
President Reagan has returned from the dead and he's taking names.
quote:
Republicans Brian Fitzpatrick and Don Bacon, joined by Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, introduced the “Ronald Reagan Peace Through Strength Act.” The bill would revoke the Treasury waiver allowing purchases of Russian diesel, bar similar future exemptions for Russian oil products, strengthen enforcement of the 2022 import ban and increase intelligence sharing with Ukraine under congressional oversight.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:02 am to Coeur du Tigre
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:16 am to cypher
quote:
JB would be proud of your attempt to spread disinformation.
Pots, kettles
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:18 am to Coeur du Tigre
I don't have to "try to defend myself", it's obviously what happened I will be proven correct as I pretty much always am.
The two posters who consistently spam this thread with pro-Ukraine Slopaganda had to jump in and do damage control immediately. Not suspicious at all. Are you so upset about the bots jumping on that narrative because they are stealing your tactics?
I will be proven correct as I pretty much always am. The two posters who consistently spam this thread with pro-Ukraine Slopaganda had to jump in and do damage control immediately. Not suspicious at all. Are you so upset about the bots jumping on that narrative because they are stealing your tactics?
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:23 am to VolSquatch
Pictured, a Starlink Mini on a Ukranian drone. Starlink mini is used with the commercial version of Starlink, and can only be used for defense hence the limits. The Ukranians thought they were being played but ultimately got caught with their hands in the cookie jar and are now doing damage control out of embarrassment
Z is at least pretty shameless, they should have just said as soon as they found out about the limits that they only altered the terminals to utilize defense against jet drones, which require much higher speeds. Instead in their neverending quest to gaslight the world, they lie.
Z is at least pretty shameless, they should have just said as soon as they found out about the limits that they only altered the terminals to utilize defense against jet drones, which require much higher speeds. Instead in their neverending quest to gaslight the world, they lie.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:25 am to Coeur du Tigre
I mean I would respond "Ukraine" in this poll and I don't want to send them another dime
What exactly does this prove in your head?
What exactly does this prove in your head?
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:25 am to goatmilker
quote:
actual evidence
That stuff doesn't matter to these people, they have narratives to push
Posted on 10/24/26 at 12:40 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
Starlink mini is used with the commercial version of Starlink, and can only be used for defense hence the limits.
GROK:
Can Starlink Mini terminals be provisioned to connect to Starshield? Did this happen in Ukraine?
Yes, Starlink terminals (including the Mini) can be provisioned/software-configured for Starshield access, and this occurred in Ukraine.
Starshield is SpaceX’s government/military-oriented service (enhanced encryption, dedicated network gateways/priority, military terms of service, and support for classified use). It relies heavily on the Starlink LEO constellation and technology as its backbone rather than a fully separate satellite network. User equipment is typically described as dedicated Starshield terminals, but commercial Starlink hardware can be granted Starshield service access via provisioning under government contracts. Some hardware is capable of connecting to both networks, and operational segregation is handled through software, separate gateways, and account settings rather than requiring entirely different physical terminals in every case.
In December 2024, the U.S. Space Systems Command Commercial Satellite Office confirmed to Bloomberg that 2,500 Ukrainian Starlink terminals had been granted Starshield access (adding to ~500 already connected), for a total of about 3,000 terminals under contracts providing service into 2025. This explicitly involved provisioning existing Starlink terminals for Starshield.
Starlink Mini is a compact commercial Starlink terminal (phased-array antenna with integrated router, lower power draw, highly portable). Ukrainian forces have used Starlink Mini units (including on drones such as the Hornet UAV) in the conflict. Given the confirmed provisioning of thousands of Starlink terminals to Starshield service in Ukraine, and the widespread military use of Minis alongside other Starlink kits for communications, guidance, and drone operations, Minis fall under the same capability. Recent 2026 reporting on speed/motion restrictions affecting Ukrainian military “Starshield” or military-grade Starlink accounts (impacting fast-moving platforms like drones) further aligns with use of these provisioned terminals.
Dedicated Starshield terminals exist and are more expensive, but the Ukraine case demonstrates that commercial Starlink hardware, including portable variants like the Mini, can be (and was) provisioned for Starshield connectivity under U.S. government contracts.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 1:18 pm to VolSquatch
quote:Absolutely wrong. This is laughable. The Starlink equipment doesn't know the difference between offensive and defensive operations, it just marks the location of the drone and facilitates communication.
Starlink mini is used with the commercial version of Starlink, and can only be used for defense hence the limits.
quote:Again wrong. SpaceX does not allow Ukraine any Starlink or StarShield connection over Russian territory. Only Ukrainian or occupied territory. So why would the Ukrainians 'strap a Starlink terminal' to drones they were using to attack Russia if these drones can't use Starlink? Jesus.
by strapping Starlink terminal into drones they were using to attack Russia
If you weren't blinded by your hatred of all things Ukrainian, you wouldn't be addicted to this Russian propaganda. Doubling down on your ignorance by accepting this nonsense and then exposing yourself by posting it is just making you foolish.
Stop digging and get some better sources.
Posted on 10/24/26 at 1:20 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
I will be proven correct as I pretty much always am.
Why don't you prove yourself correct now? Take your time.
Page 891 of 896
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News