- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Killing people who are not attacking you or your countrymen is MURDER and anti-Christ
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
just sit in the woods and arm chair QB. It's what you do best.
0
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
No, but youre demonstratably insane.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:50 pm to HillbillyTiger
quote:
Lord have mercy on you buddy.
That's not my opinion. That was the Official Policy of the Entire United States of America, to include ALL clergy of all Faiths in the USA and Britain at that time. Not one single Christian or Jewish leader spoke out against the incineration of the little blonde haired and blue eyed German girl children during all of those years of the war.
Why am I supposed to oppose the current US military/foreign policy that is incinerating adult criminal footsoldiers of an international narco-terror cartel?
Show me why incinerating the German infants was good and legal but burning these drug running goofballs is morally wrong and illegal.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:52 pm to HillbillyTiger
What denomination are you?
I’ll bet you’re not even Christian. It’s always the non-Christians telling Christians how to be a good Christian.
I’ll bet you’re not even Christian. It’s always the non-Christians telling Christians how to be a good Christian.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:52 pm to HillbillyTiger
quote:
You see any that prescribe a penalty of death without trial?
I’m not arguing with you, brother.
I assume it’s illegal and immoral, but I’m not a lawyer or a preacher.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:54 pm to antibarner
quote:
, but youre demonstratably insane.
And you are pathologically afraid...
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:56 pm to HillbillyTiger
[quote]Those on here who support assassinating other humans and have no qualms about a soulless govt that engages in such actions are not followers of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Look inside your souls and may Lord have mercy on us as a country for continuing to support such killing all around the world. No new wars, stop the insanity.
They are assassinating innocent members of our society so they are targets.
Look inside your souls and may Lord have mercy on us as a country for continuing to support such killing all around the world. No new wars, stop the insanity.
They are assassinating innocent members of our society so they are targets.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
No. I've personally experienced the results of your madness and I want to see a stop put to it.
You would cause the deaths of many more. Youre an enabler. Insane.
You would cause the deaths of many more. Youre an enabler. Insane.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 12:59 pm to HillbillyTiger
Number of Posts: 246
Registered on: 10/1/2025
Crawl back into your troll hole
Registered on: 10/1/2025
Crawl back into your troll hole
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:00 pm to antibarner
quote:
No. I've personally experienced the results of your madness
and that freedom caused you to shrivel up into a ball under your desk.
quote:
We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty...I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."
Charlie Kirk, on the value of freedom.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:01 pm to HillbillyTiger
quote:Federal statutes are also subservient to the Constitution, which requires a fair trial and due process for criminal matters on U.S. soil.
Federal Drug Statutes
You see any that prescribe a penalty of death without trial?
They do not apply to enemy combatants overseas (not on U.S. soil).
If the administration is considering drug traffickers not on U.S. soil to be foreign enemy combatants in a drug war, then the U.S. penal code doesn't apply to them. That's why those opposed to these actions are focusing on potential war crimes rather than breaking constitutional law.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:07 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
They do not apply to enemy combatants overseas (not on U.S. soil).
Under the UCMJ, an “enemy” is defined as “any hostile forces that are opposing the United States armed forces whether they are military or civilian in nature”.
What proof has the US govt provided to the public that ANY of those murdered by our govt opposed the US military and thus warranted death?
I also earlier provided definition of terrorist provided by the US State Dept, which none of these individuals meet the definition of.
I agree, what is going on are war crimes.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:08 pm to HillbillyTiger
quote:There it is, alter twat get's to the point of this shite.
I agree, what is going on are war crimes.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:11 pm to HillbillyTiger
quote:If you agree that they are war crimes, then don't cite federal criminal statutes that don't apply
Under the UCMJ, an “enemy” is defined as “any hostile forces that are opposing the United States armed forces whether they are military or civilian in nature”.
What proof has the US govt provided to the public that ANY of those murdered by our govt opposed the US military and thus warranted death?
I also earlier provided definition of terrorist provided by the US State Dept, which none of these individuals meet the definition of.
I agree, what is going on are war crimes.
I'm not arguing whether or not the drug traffickers are terrorists or whether or not each instance of obliterating a boat full of alleged drug traffickers over the past few months is justified. I'm only arguing that at least in theory, governments can and do have the authority--according to the Bible--to wage just war, which may not include the same level of due process as a criminal matter.
I'm arguing about the principle that even Christian governments (I don't think we have one of those, BTW) have this right to defend their people from threats and that it isn't immoral according to God's word.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:13 pm to Champagne
quote:
That was the Official Policy of the Entire United States of America, to include ALL clergy of all Faiths in the USA and Britain at that time
This is not true and NEVER was the position then - nor since - by any Orthodox jurisdiction in the USA.
quote:
Why am I supposed to oppose the current US military/foreign policy that is incinerating adult criminal footsoldiers of an international narco-terror cartel?
Narco-terror cartel? What “narco-terror” has been perpetrated on Americans foreign or domestic and by which cartel? You mean the one CIA made up the name as a joke?
quote:
Show me why incinerating the German infants was good and legal but burning these drug running goofballs is morally wrong and illegal.
Neither are good…that is your zero sum argument, not mine.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:14 pm to HillbillyTiger
So troll it is
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:14 pm to HillbillyTiger
Obey the laws that government employ. Our government said no drugs. If you persist, you will be dealt with severely.
Romans 13:1-2 NKJV
[1] Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. [2] Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.
LINK
Romans 13:1-2 NKJV
[1] Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. [2] Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.
LINK
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:15 pm to HillbillyTiger
The UCMJ is not the controlling law on this issue. It's probably partially relevant and worth consideration but it is not controlling.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:17 pm to HillbillyTiger
quote:
What “narco-terror” has been perpetrated on Americans foreign or domestic and by which cartel
Amazing.Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:21 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
If you agree that they are war crimes, then don't cite federal criminal statutes that don't apply
I cited Federal statutes as they are the ONLY laws we have re: drug crimes…that includes interdictions OUTSIDE of territorial waters aka “high seas” by USCG.
So before you conflate the difference, know what you’re talking about.
quote:
I'm only arguing that at least in theory, governments can and do have the authority--according to the Bible--to wage just war, which may not include the same level of due process as a criminal matter
Please cite in New Testament where Christians are told to “wage just war”…funny coming from a Calvinist citing Roman Catholic doctrine.
quote:
I'm arguing about the principle that even Christian governments (I don't think we have one of those, BTW) have this right to defend their people from threats and that it isn't immoral according to God's word
Yes, the Church has always taught that if a nation/kingdom is attacked it is the DUTY of those who bear the sword to defend it…ie an invading army crosses the border…nowhere is murdering CIVILIANS on the high seas even remotely righteous.
Page 12 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News