- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ketanya Jackson...She is very very bad for this court
Posted on 6/21/25 at 2:56 pm to Morpheus
Posted on 6/21/25 at 2:56 pm to Morpheus
I get that, but not saying you're sorry about your opinion isn't disrespectful. If anyone takes it as such that's their problem.
This post was edited on 6/21/25 at 4:08 pm
0
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:13 pm to WWII Collector
quote:potatojoe couldn't pick her out of a lineup
Biden DEI appointment
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:26 pm to dafif
She is the #1 reason why they stole the 2020 election.
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:30 pm to dafif
NEVER forget these three names.
quote:
Senators who voted for Jackson's confirmation
Republicans
Susan Collins, Maine
Mitt Romney, Utah
Lisa Murkowski, Alaska
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:46 pm to dafif
She, or that person, is a left wing activist.....and dont let anyone tell you otherwise.
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:51 pm to dafif
quote:
This beyotch has zero consideration for the actual constitution and would take your guns in a heartbeat.
No, she wouldn't. But it would be interesting watching her try. I guarantee that.
Gun confiscation is the one hill upon which everyone who loves freedom should be prepared to die. The protections guaranteed by the Second Amendment are the only thing that preserves all other Amendments. Fact.
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm a textualist and your analysis is correct That's why it's funny to me when all those on here saying WKA should be overruled
I still have not found "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" except the one opinion discussing England and the king and his subjects but again none of that actually dealt with an illegal so there is a small chance that the court could interpret that differently
I know England now has different laws that disallow it. Perhaps ... like Roe, the original interpretation was wrong.
Posted on 6/21/25 at 4:59 pm to dafif
quote:
but again none of that actually dealt with an illegal
Literally irrelevant
quote:
so there is a small chance that the court could interpret that differently
Then they would be following the interpretation that Justice Jackson just promoted
Posted on 6/21/25 at 7:02 pm to dgnx6
quote:
SFPs favorite Judge.
Surely you have a link that proves this.
Posted on 6/21/25 at 7:19 pm to roadGator
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News