- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ken Paxton Seems Like a Decent Guy
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:27 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:27 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
cwill told me he was a scumbag.
Do a 180 of what he suggests.
0
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:29 pm to Turbeauxdog
Hi cockgobbler.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:37 pm to Texas Ram
Unfortunately, that was the cliffs!
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:38 pm to DrKnievel
quote:
For anybody that has done home improvement, you know you have to pay for materials in advance.
This is categorically false. From both a contractor and homeowner perspective.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:40 pm to DrKnievel
quote:
oversaw the drafting of an opinion that went against established law
What is this referring to?
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:42 pm to cwill
That’s it?
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:44 pm to VOR
quote:
had his palm unlawfullygreased
'splain please
How? what? when?
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:45 pm to Turbeauxdog
His legal analysis is also not correct. I practice labor and employment defense (representing management) and we frequently settle cases where the company fired the employee for legitimate reasons.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:46 pm to DrKnievel
quote:
For anybody that has done home improvement, you know you have to pay for materials in advance.
Here we go again.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:47 pm to NIH
quote:
we frequently settle cases where the company fired the employee for legitimate reasons.
That's gotta piss you off. It would piss me off.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:48 pm to Turbeauxdog
Yes
I see more frivolous filings than you would think.
I see more frivolous filings than you would think.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:48 pm to the808bass
quote:
Here we go again.
Sounds like some contractors took him for a ride.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:49 pm to NIH
quote:
more frivolous filings than you would think.
Hahaha doubt it. I assume the worst of everything though.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:52 pm to cwill
quote:
not lack of evidence
'splain pls?
what evidence was overlooked? - give us a hint.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:53 pm to NIH
quote:
His legal analysis is also not correct. I practice labor and employment defense (representing management) and we frequently settle cases where the company fired the employee for legitimate reasons.
Simple question - why?
I said there could be other reasons so I’m not sure how that is a lie
How about my analysis? I have never claimed to be a lawyer. Just an objective viewer
Posted on 9/21/23 at 6:53 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
AssClown
FIFY
Posted on 9/21/23 at 7:06 pm to DrKnievel
There are many factors - exposure, witnesses’ willingness to testify, cost of defense, etc.
Posted on 9/21/23 at 7:10 pm to NIH
quote:
There are many factors - exposure, witnesses’ willingness to testify, cost of defense, etc.
Exposures and cost of defense is essentially what I said.
We obviously don’t have a witness problem here.
So how did I lie again?
Edit: I went back and reviewed my post. In my head I had grouped those together, but what I actually wrote was just the cost of the trial. Just wanted to be fair
This post was edited on 9/21/23 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 9/21/23 at 7:33 pm to Turbeauxdog
The legal opinion that Paxton offered at midnight on a Saturday that prevented foreclosure sales outside.
I’ll try to be briefer.
In the trial (and you can watch it for yourself), they had a draft copy that referenced some federal opinion or law(can’t remember). They sent it to Paxton on a Friday night. I believe it was bangert. Anyway, Paxton told them it was the wrong answer. In order to creatively get to the answer he wanted, they removed the reference to this other law. If you watch the final cross by the defense, they were trying to get him to say it was an opinion. He refused and said that was the law. The defense never brought anyone else up to my recollection to refute that.
There was other witnesses that I think touched on it. The problem (as they stated it) was that Texas was trying to do everything in their power to open things back up, so this opinion was counter to it. Another witness (think the last one) said that Paxton had held an outdoor campaign event a month earlier, so this was counter to everything Texas was trying to do to open things back up
Watch it for yourself, and see what your takeaway was. That was mine
Sorry - the opening back up was in reference to Covid (which I didn’t include)
I’ll try to be briefer.
In the trial (and you can watch it for yourself), they had a draft copy that referenced some federal opinion or law(can’t remember). They sent it to Paxton on a Friday night. I believe it was bangert. Anyway, Paxton told them it was the wrong answer. In order to creatively get to the answer he wanted, they removed the reference to this other law. If you watch the final cross by the defense, they were trying to get him to say it was an opinion. He refused and said that was the law. The defense never brought anyone else up to my recollection to refute that.
There was other witnesses that I think touched on it. The problem (as they stated it) was that Texas was trying to do everything in their power to open things back up, so this opinion was counter to it. Another witness (think the last one) said that Paxton had held an outdoor campaign event a month earlier, so this was counter to everything Texas was trying to do to open things back up
Watch it for yourself, and see what your takeaway was. That was mine
Sorry - the opening back up was in reference to Covid (which I didn’t include)
This post was edited on 9/21/23 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 9/21/23 at 7:36 pm to VOR
quote:
He’s a guy who had his palm unlawfullygreased by a sleazy real estate developer. The fact that he’s a conservative and interviewed by the shill, Carlson, doesn’t make him “decent”.
What a piece of shite you are.
Page 4 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News