- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karnelo Anthony is being Charged as Adult under Texas State Law
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:05 pm to dnm3305
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:05 pm to dnm3305
quote:
Exactly, you prove my point.
There is never true justice anymore.
Best case scenario is not even close to true justice.
So you want to eliminate appeals in criminal law?
You do realize Trump is currently appealing a criminal conviction, right?
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
You going to defend him in court?
You know you want to.
From what you know about this case in the media, what lawyer would want to take it up???
You know you want to.
From what you know about this case in the media, what lawyer would want to take it up???
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:27 pm to RTM4
quote:
You going to defend him in court?
You know you want to.
Naw. It's not my style.
quote:
From what you know about this case in the media, what lawyer would want to take it up???
Plenty.
You can charge something insane like $500k-1M. The publicity will be worth $10-20M. If you can pull it off, you're basically a celebrity lawyer who can print 7 figures a year and get an 8-figure book deal without having to really work again
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
I get the the money, publicity and fame but for you lawyers there is one big question you scum bags seem to forget.
Morals. Sell your soul for fame, glory and a monetary pay off.
Scummy if you ask me. You do you.
Morals. Sell your soul for fame, glory and a monetary pay off.
Scummy if you ask me. You do you.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:35 pm to RTM4
quote:
but for you lawyers there is one big question you scum bags seem to forget.
Morals.
A trial isn't a judgment of morality, or even the truth.
It's a competition of evidence and argument. The state has a burden to use evidence and argument to prove their assertions beyond a reasonable doubt to 12 people. The defense is retained to ensure they meet that standard.
This is not a modern paradigm. It's been some version of this system for thousands of years. Predating even Rome and ancient Greece.
And, as I've explained many times on here, the system is often most tested with very unsavory people, because that's the only real opportunities to test the system. Not only is the State more likely to break the rules with a guilty person, but your population cohort within the system of guilty (or just bad, if you want to look to a designation outside of the system) people is exponentially higher than the alternatives.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:43 pm to cajunangelle
I'm never a fan of calling someone something they are not.
He could not buy beer or cigarettes because he is not an adult.
I am not wanting a lighter sentence for him, it's just that words matter to me.
Boys are boys , girls are girls, adults are adults and minors are minors
He could not buy beer or cigarettes because he is not an adult.
I am not wanting a lighter sentence for him, it's just that words matter to me.
Boys are boys , girls are girls, adults are adults and minors are minors
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Don't give me that legal bullshite. YOU of all people know what is wrong and what is right.
If you defend a person that is obviously guilty for fame and fortune you are a scumbag.
If you defend a person that is obviously guilty for fame and fortune you are a scumbag.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:55 pm to RTM4
quote:
Don't give me that legal bullshite.
I thought we were talking about a prosecution/trial and lawyers?
quote:
YOU of all people know what is wrong and what is right.
I already told you that this is not my style. Don't impute me explaining the system to me, personally.
I don't do high profile intentionally.
quote:
If you defend a person that is obviously guilty for fame and fortune you are a scumbag.
My last case that almost went high profile (it could have become one of those national-racial stories) ended up in a dismissal prior to trial. The family of the purported victim would tell you it was a case where my client was "obviously guilty" as he hit the purported victim, who did die thereafter. There was no dispute about that.
In fact, one of the close family members was a mayor of a town within a short radius and he DID try to make that argument (and make the case into a thing).
Now, I will say my client was the white guy in the scenario and the decedent was black, so had that case broken out into a big deal publicity-wise, this forum would have had my back, no doubt.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 5:56 pm to LordSaintly
quote:For the sake of black Americans, they better hope they don't.
My post was wishful thinking, but my gut says you’re right.
I just really hope this doesn’t happen. He’s clearly guilty and he will be rightfully convicted.
Firstly, because this murderer being found not guilty (or guilty, doesn't matter on whether or not they riot), along with the payout would put a money bag over every white child's head which would enrage white Americans who've even an ounce of dignity and sense of self-preservation for they and their loved ones.
Secondly, couple that scenario with the almost certain event that they'll riot and black Americans will effectively seal their fate into the foreseeable future in this country.
People are sick and f'ing tired of it. Just sick with fatigue. It will turn violent in due time, and it won't be blacks who come out on the better end. They can't absolve this man of this murder. They absolutely cannot do it.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 6:04 pm to cajunangelle
I’ve pointed this out elsewhere. Even Ben Crump knows this case is a loser and he’s retarded.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 7:39 pm to LordSaintly
Honestly I don’t think there’ll be riots. No white cop was involved and the person killed was the white kid. And the trial won’t be for a long time.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 8:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
I get where you are coming from, everyone needs legal council but to volunteer for the shite show and your own conscience is not normal.
PM me, I need an attorney on speed dial.... You sound right up my alley.
PM me, I need an attorney on speed dial.... You sound right up my alley.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 8:06 pm to cajunangelle
Hell yeah. Fire up Ole’ Sparky.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 8:10 pm to GetmorewithLes
He threatened Austin Metcalf prior to altercation. Self defense flies out the window.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 8:11 pm to Sizzle_DAWG
Is Ben Crump there yet?
Posted on 5/25/25 at 9:48 pm to novabill
quote:
I'm never a fan of calling someone something they are not. He could not buy beer or cigarettes because he is not an adult.
Texas law disagrees.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 9:58 pm to TigerRoyale
quote:
There will definitely be riots if he's found guilty.
Good chance. Some of the rioters will be hired and staged.
But it's Texas. There should also be some arrests and prosecutions.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 10:01 pm to cajunangelle
Is there any doubt that this POS should get the death penalty?
Posted on 5/25/25 at 10:05 pm to RTM4
quote:
If you defend a person that is obviously guilty for fame and fortune you are a scumbag.
Think about who you're conversing with.
Popular
Back to top



1






