- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justin Amash thinks Barr lied & Trump should be impeached
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:11 pm to bmy
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:11 pm to bmy
You left off the part from the excerpt where it specifically says “ this report does conclude that the President committed a crime...”. Why was that portion left off your quote?
1
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:13 pm to bmy
It still doesn’t say it baw. No matter how many times you paste and how bad you want it. It certainly hints (classic Mueller) but it won’t come out and say it.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Beautiful. Was hoping you would use McGahn. He also said Trumps reasoning was because he felt Mueller had a conflict of interest. I noticed you didn’t address the element of corrupt intent. If you are going to use McGahn’s testimony about the attempted actions as proof of elements of a crime, you must also use his motive given in the same exact interview. This means there was no corrupt intent and therefore no possibility of obstruction.
Again....does your ignorance know no bounds?
you should check again. the intent marker is tough to see. edge of the paragraph.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:14 pm to KCT
quote:
He's not even really a Navy guy. He's just another fatass bureaucrat with a desk job.
Hey I’m fitter than I ever was in the Navy. Almost 73in, 177lbs.
You should work out, too, Karla. Might boost your testosterone (much needed for you) and improve your disposition.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You left off the part from the excerpt where it specifically says “ this report does conclude that the President committed a crime...”. Why was that portion left off your quote?
because it can't conclude that the president committed a crime given his prior reasoning. it just presents facts. i thought that was obvious?
This post was edited on 5/18/19 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:15 pm to bmy
quote:
you should check again. the intent marker is tough to see. edge of the paragraph.
Requires corrupt intent. If m, as McGhan stated, the Oresident sought to fire because of conflict...that is not corrupt intent.
You aren’t very good at this. That was a layup.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:15 pm to bmy
quote:
Mueller was unable to conclude that Trump obstructed justice because it is DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
Baloney. Obligatory what happens if Trump kills a guy with a single punch to the throat on federal jurisdiction WH grounds. Caught on video.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:16 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Requires corrupt intent. If m, as McGhan stated, the Oresident sought to fire because of conflict...that is not corrupt intent.
You aren’t very good at this. That was a layup.
Page 120 of the report.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:16 pm to BBONDS25
The fact that bmy is defending this is a disgrace
I'm embarrassed for him
I'm embarrassed for him
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:16 pm to bmy
quote:
because it can't conclude that the president committed a crime given his prior reasoning. i thought that was obvious?
Perhaps your ignorance is why you thought this. Finding a crime occurred and pursuing an indictment are not mutually exclusive. Yet the report goes out of its way to specifically state they did not find a crime was committed.
Another layup. You aren’t very good at this.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:17 pm to Bunyan
quote:
The fact that bmy is defending this is a disgrace
I'm embarrassed for him
i don't think trumps actions rise to a level worthy of impeachment.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:17 pm to bmy
quote:
Page 120 of the report.
This is just sad. Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:21 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Perhaps your ignorance is why you thought this. Finding a crime occurred and pursuing an indictment are not mutually exclusive. Yet the report goes out of its way to specifically state they did not find a crime was committed.
Another layup. You aren’t very good at this.
i don't know why i bother when you clearly don't read anything i post
Third, we considered whether to evaluate the conduct we investigated under the Justice Manual standards governing prosecution and declination decisions, but we determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crimes.
This post was edited on 5/18/19 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:25 pm to davyjones
quote:
Similar to liberties taken in "Trump said there were good white nationalists in Charlottesville." Healthy sized liberties we're talking here.
Yes, the left and the media took some huge liberties there too.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:25 pm to KCT
quote:
Dude, you're so full of shite it's not even funny.
The next 18 months are going to be pure hell for people like you, Urkel, sfp, etc.
bmy: technically mueller outlined instances where trump obstructed justice
kct: but he was frustrated by constant accusations it's just human nature
bmy: glad we agree he committed a crime. i don't think either of us really give a shite about it.
kct: bro u are so full of shite
This post was edited on 5/18/19 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:26 pm to bmy
quote:
i don't think trumps actions rise to a level worthy of impeachment.
Glad to see you disagree with Amash just like the rest of us in this thread.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:28 pm to bmy
quote:
but we determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crime
So....they did not make a determination that the President committed a crime. Yet here you are saying the only reason they didn’t indict was DOJ policy? Those two positions are at odds with each other.
Amazing self-own.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:32 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
He is smart. He didn’t do his job and still gave himself cover while being too big of a pussy to subpoena the President or charge him.
It's up to Congress to impeach. Mueller did his job.
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:34 pm to Pocket Kingz
So why hasn’t Congress impeached?
Posted on 5/18/19 at 6:36 pm to Pocket Kingz
quote:
s up to Congress to impeach. Mueller did his job.
Agreed. Exoneration of anything to do with Russia. No finding on Obstruction. Barr and Rosenstein put that to rest.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News