- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justice Department Considering Pushing to Ban Transgendered People from Owning Firearms
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:48 pm to bhtigerfan
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:48 pm to bhtigerfan
i wouldn’t put it past those cock suckers. Look at the shite they pulled off for Covid.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:49 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
..the system isnt perfect but we pay a price for our freedoms.
Exactly. There are tradeoffs. But at least I am able to defend myself.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:50 pm to roadGator
quote:
2a or not 2a. That is the question.
Not really. Laws are already in place for mental conditions. Don't you agree?
So if they can get it classified mental, then 2a doesn't apply
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:50 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:Or the alternative of letting criminals and mentally ill psychopaths continue to own firearms and shoot up neighborhoods and schools to the point that it changes public opinion in favor of stricter gun laws like assault weapons bans.
Apparently the plan is to keep democrats from taking guns away... by doing having republicans do it.
Let the inner city gun violence and school shooting continue and possibly escalate and a majority of the public is going to be begging for gun control.
I’m trying to prevent that by stopping those who commit gun violence to have access (legal or illegal) to firearms.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:52 pm to mikesliveisacheater
quote:
Stephen Miller is sitting in a room somewhere saying, "I bet you that I can make liberals protest AGAINST gun control."
This. They’ll have them protesting abortion next.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:53 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I thought you were wrong when you called Trump
The abruptness of MAGA's shift leftward is staggering.
a populist. I’ve been proven wrong
I thought you were being dramatic when you predicted it would drift into progressivism. I figured it would die out before that drift happened. …. I’m just going to keep an open from here out
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:53 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Or the alternative of letting criminals and mentally ill psychopaths continue to own firearms
Just to get this straight, you dont think our current system goes far enough to limit firarms from certain people
Millions of hard working baws smoke weed and "lie" on their forms. Should they be thrown under the bus too?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:54 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I thought you were being dramatic when you predicted it would drift into progressivism.
It always does, brother...
Once they get a taste of authoritarianism, its like tasting blood to a shark. They'll swarm.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:54 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:Exactly. We just go ahead and ban AR15s.
Or the alternative of letting criminals and mentally ill psychopaths continue to own firearms and shoot up neighborhoods and schools to the point that it changes public opinion in favor of stricter gun laws like assault weapons bans.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:55 pm to roguetiger15
quote:
Look at the shite they pulled off for Covid.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:56 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Charlie Kirk is a fig
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:”Everyone hates the man, until they become the man”. I should have learned from Obama voters. But silly me expected more from MAGA folks.
Once they get a taste of authoritarianism, its like tasting blood to a shark. They'll swarm.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:00 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Or the alternative of letting criminals and mentally ill psychopaths continue to own firearms
This is already illegal. You just want “mental ill psychopaths” broadened to include a group you don’t like. Never fun once the rabbit has the gun, however (pun intended).
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I’m not suggesting that at all.
To eliminate illegal firearms you would have to clamp down strongly on the legal market, like you are suggesting.
Use existing laws like convicted felons carrying firearms. Put them away for a long time. Their recidivism rate is off the charts.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:03 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Not really. Laws are already in place for mental conditions. Don't you agree?
They are very specific and can only be very narrowly applied to a very small number of cases of people with mental health issues. A judge with input from a medical professional are involved in these cases on a case by case basis. There isnt some blanket law that strips a certain class of mentally ill folks from owning firearms.
quote:
So if they can get it classified mental, then 2a doesn't apply
So a guy or gal going through a rough spot..like a divorce or death of a loved one who is depressed and is seeing a therapist or psychiatrist...perhaps is even on an anti depressant or veteran dealing with PTSD.....is "classified mental" whatever the frick that means.... loses his constitutional right to bear arms............are you mental?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:03 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:Whe. did being trans become a crime?
Use existing laws like convicted felons carrying firearms. Put them away for a long time. Their recidivism rate is off the charts.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:03 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Use existing laws
Agreed. Why do we need more laws/broader definitions?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:04 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Use existing laws like convicted felons carrying firearms. Put them away for a long time
I've known people who have done 10 years for that charge, in a federal facility and the feds do NOT play.
The problem is there is too much money in the underground economy and not enough prudent enforcement of the current laws.
We wouldnt need blanket laws if we actually properly applied the current ones.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:05 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Agreed. Why do we need more laws/broader definitions?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:05 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Because the next law is the one that will work! Just one more law, bro!
Agreed. Why do we need more laws/broader definitions?
Progressive have been telling us this for decades. Now MAGA folks have picked it up.
Popular
Back to top


1






