re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

quote:

---

He was “diagnosed” as dysphoric by some lesbian whose business is called “Dallas Rainbow Counseling”. Seems completely legit to me.

---

Yep, at age 6, after 5 years of being brainwashed.

And I'm sure there was no confirmation bias involved with the "Rainbow" Counselor.

How convenient is it that the father was granted every aspect of conservatorship EXCEPT that he wasn't allowed to get a second opinion with an independent psychologist?

Funny how the judge wouldn't allow anyone to examine and evaluate James except the one psychologist the mother wanted.

But dipshit Hank wants us to believe the judge wasn't biased.

The Findings of Fact that the judge signed off on where obnoxiously retarded too. Indisputable proof the judge had a bias against the father.

“Findings of Fact” are.normally drafted by the prevailing party and a draft is presented to the judge for revision and/signature. They are always somewhat biased.

The court appointed an amicus attorney to represent the child, and his questions of the witnesses seem to be largely aligned with the father’s desires.

Here and here and here are pretty good summaries of two days of expert testimony, from a website largely sympathetic to the father’s position. A good read.

Interestingly, there was near-unanimity among the experts that the child should not commence medical reassignment for another three or four years. There was also near-unanimity that the child currently remains “gender fluid,” meaning that he has not settled completely on one gender or the other.

Do not engage pierre delecto in his tangent.

He needs to own his position and continue dying on that hill.

quote:

---

Yes, hank is.

50 posters are telling him he is fricking sick.

---

That gives me some relief.

quote:

---

quote:

---

Are leftist actually defending castrating a 7 year old child?

---

Yes, hank is. 50 posters are telling him he is fricking sick.

---

Hank has argued nothing of the sort. In fact, he has specifically stated that the child is far too young to begin medical transition, even if he IS gender-dysphoric. Hank has also cited to Dr. Debra Soh, who recommends AGAINST medical transition of pre-pubescent children.

But Deux will continue to assert that I have said things I did not say and taken positions that I have not taken.

It is what he does.

quote:

---

Here is the article from Dr, Debra Soh, in which she presents that position ... with which I agree.

---

You agree with her position but don't think chemically castrating a seven year old is child abuse???

quote:

---

You agree with her position but don't think chemically castrating a seven year old is child abuse???

---

Correct.

I think it is the wrong move, given the literature regarding the eventual sexuality of dysphoric pre-pubescents, but that is not remotely the same as “child abuse.”

There is a wide range of descriptions that might apply to such actions ... ranging thru “categorically correct” at one end of the spectrum thru “blatant child abuse” at the other end ... with “marginally the better option” and “wrong decision with honest motivation” falling between the poles.

I think the last of those descriptors is probably most accurate.

Interesting that you short string of upvotes has stopped again, pierre.

Pierre Delecto already told us, its "just a bad decision" oh well ho hum.

And, Hank-Romney also said we are all emotional authoritarians for wanting to legislate against child abuse.

What an obtuse arse.

K thx