- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/13/20 at 7:30 pm to boosiebadazz
So now I’ll read it, because it’s now relevant ty.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 7:47 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:What charges ? DOJ (the plaintiff) doesn’t want to charge. Is the Judicial branch now rogue ??
The judge doesn't have to grant the Motion to Dismiss the Charges against Flynn
Posted on 5/13/20 at 7:54 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
ineffective assistance of counsel
My arse. Those motherfrickers were colluding with a corrupt prosecution.
Every lawyer with their name in that letterhead should be disbarred and then beaten to unconsciousness.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:02 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
that if the court intends to question the defendant under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel about the offense to which he/she has pleaded, that his/her answers may later be used against him/her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement.
So let me get this straight, a provision in place to hold a defendant accountable for lying to the court in his defense is being used to attempt a new prosecution of a defendant that the plaintiff admits was prosecuted in bad faith in the first place?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:05 pm to Turbeauxdog
Quickest way to end this is for Flynn to say he lied to the Court in his plea on advice of his counsel, who were colluding with a corrupt prosecution. He fricks them, and then he gets a pardon for a bullshite conviction.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:11 pm to Zachary
quote:
Perjury was not the charge at issue in the case.
It is now because the new Lord and Savior Barack Obama said Flynn committed perjury.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:24 pm to TOKEN
The DOJ dropped the charges. Before that, they put forth evidence of his guilt and argued into the court record. If the court is pondering whether Flynn committed perjury by changing his plea and should be held in Criminal contempt, should the prosecutors also be brought up for the same contempt (and they’re arguably be held to a higher standard as officers of the court)?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:25 pm to Big Jim Slade
yes
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:28 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:46 pm to boosiebadazz
A judge has contempt power.
He doesn’t have the power to charge someone with lying to the FBI or violating the Logan Act
He doesn’t have the power to charge someone with lying to the FBI or violating the Logan Act
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:08 pm to Wednesday
How can a DOJ dropping a case because new evidence was found be Flynn committing contempt?
Where is Van Grack?
Where is Van Grack?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:11 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
The judge doesn't have to grant the Motion to Dismiss the Charges against Flynn
If the prosecution doesn’t show up...
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:13 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Judge Jeanine
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:20 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
How can a DOJ dropping a case because new evidence was found be Flynn committing contempt?
It can’t be. Because it isn’t.
This is such utter bullshite CA. I’m nauseous
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:29 pm to Wednesday
quote:
A judge has contempt power.
Which is what he appointed this retired judge to address.
quote:
He doesn’t have the power to charge someone with lying to the FBI or violating the Logan Act
Never said he does or is.
But Flynn plead pursuant to Rule 11 and it was comprehensive and compete.
So what now has changed? I don’t see how Flynn and Van Grack can both come out of this unscathed. The two are mutually exclusive at this point and Sullivan seems like he’s sticking his boot up one of their asses.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:32 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
So what now has changed?
The plaintiff admitted it’s prosecution was unethical
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:32 pm to boosiebadazz
Who are you hoping gets the boot?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:33 pm to Turbeauxdog
Was it unethical for the three years or was pursued and if so, did the prosecutor know this and maintain it anyway?
It’s forest for the trees, but in a way Sullivan is holding DOJ accountable by this recent move. If he dismisses it then it all gets swept under the rug.
It’s forest for the trees, but in a way Sullivan is holding DOJ accountable by this recent move. If he dismisses it then it all gets swept under the rug.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:35 pm to roadGator
Depends what comes out and what DOJ knew when.
I know that if I’m Van Grack tonight, my butthole is puckering way more than Mike Flynn’s is.
I know that if I’m Van Grack tonight, my butthole is puckering way more than Mike Flynn’s is.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News