- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge rules that Rachel Maddow's show is not news, someone should tell her 3 viewers
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:44 am
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:44 am
pjmedia
Journalist Glenn Greenwald reports that an Obama-appointed judge ruled last month that “Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news.”
The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them (‘literally is paid Russian propaganda’).”
Bashant also ruled that Maddow’s viewers “expect” this of Maddow and watch her show “with the understanding that it will contain Maddow’s ‘personal and subjective views’ about the news.”
So, while I agree with the judge ruling that Rachel Maddow isn’t news, this explanation was used to protect Maddow, MSNBC, and Comcast from a legitimate defamation claim. So, in that respect, the ruling was quite awful.
I think there needs to be a warning coming out of every commercial break then.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald reports that an Obama-appointed judge ruled last month that “Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news.”
The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them (‘literally is paid Russian propaganda’).”
Bashant also ruled that Maddow’s viewers “expect” this of Maddow and watch her show “with the understanding that it will contain Maddow’s ‘personal and subjective views’ about the news.”
So, while I agree with the judge ruling that Rachel Maddow isn’t news, this explanation was used to protect Maddow, MSNBC, and Comcast from a legitimate defamation claim. So, in that respect, the ruling was quite awful.
I think there needs to be a warning coming out of every commercial break then.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:48 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Yeah I think a clear disclaimer should be required if that’s the defense. I have no problem with satire.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:50 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Amazing the hoops they will jump through to protect their media apparatus...
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:50 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
All press credentials for MSNBC should be taken away. Entertainment is not news. There is no journalistic standard anymore.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:50 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
What about when they put her on the main desk for election coverage?
And, if she's just a DNC mouthpiece, why is she allowed to do Democrat "debates"?
And, if she's just a DNC mouthpiece, why is she allowed to do Democrat "debates"?
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:51 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
quote:
her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion
This goes for every "news" show on TV today. Do not question dear leader Biden
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:53 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
This is the same rap that liberals love to lay on Tucker Carlson. They crow about it incessantly.
HA! HA! Joke's on you, commies!
HA! HA! Joke's on you, commies!
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:54 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
the ole Sidney Powell defense
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:54 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
That was the defense - "nobody is supposed to actually believe what I say".
The Obama judge scored an own goal here. Maddow doesn't have to pay damages, but now we have an official court ruling that "everything that guy just said is bullshite".
The Obama judge scored an own goal here. Maddow doesn't have to pay damages, but now we have an official court ruling that "everything that guy just said is bullshite".
Posted on 6/23/21 at 8:56 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Fine. This precedent will also protect people like Tucker and Hannity.
Game on.
Game on.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 9:01 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
How demeaning. Maddow, who MSNBC marketed as a Rhodes Scholar, has been reduced to a tabloid mouthpiece in an effort to rebuff a defamation claim.
Put another way, the judge is saying that she's so full of shite and her audience is composed of mouth breathing morons who only watch to hear this clown tell them what they want to believe, so no one should ever take anything she says seriously.
What a brutal existence. A prostitute of ideas, wishcasting leftist tropes to the Johns watching cable news...although we can't even call it that according to the judge.
Put another way, the judge is saying that she's so full of shite and her audience is composed of mouth breathing morons who only watch to hear this clown tell them what they want to believe, so no one should ever take anything she says seriously.
What a brutal existence. A prostitute of ideas, wishcasting leftist tropes to the Johns watching cable news...although we can't even call it that according to the judge.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 9:01 am to blueboy
Posted on 6/23/21 at 9:02 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
How demeaning. Maddow, who MSNBC marketed as a Rhodes Scholar, has been reduced to a tabloid mouthpiece in an effort to rebuff a defamation claim.
Put another way, the judge is saying that she's so full of shite and her audience is composed of mouth breathing morons who only watch to hear this clown tell them what they want to believe, so no one should ever take anything she says seriously.
What a brutal existence. A prostitute of ideas, wishcasting leftist tropes to the Johns watching cable news...although we can't even call it that according to the judge.
now do Tucker Carlson
Posted on 6/23/21 at 9:04 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
the ole Sidney Powell defense
When is ole Sidney going to pay up for all that bs shes getting sued for?
Posted on 6/23/21 at 9:08 am to SDVTiger
It won’t be until the judge rules on her motion to dismiss because no reasonable person would take what she said as true
Remember when she was luring them in to sue her bc “muh discovery” and then she tried to get the case dismissed before entering into discovery?
Good times
Remember when she was luring them in to sue her bc “muh discovery” and then she tried to get the case dismissed before entering into discovery?
Good times
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 9:09 am
Posted on 6/23/21 at 9:11 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
If you don’t know it’s pure socialist propaganda by now, you are the problem
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News