- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge issues arrest warrant for @lascanner
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:29 am to Chucktown_Badger
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:29 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Nice false equivalency. In many states law enforcement is required to announce where they will be ahead of time.
Not shooting radar
And people may not see the announcement.
You can add "filming police arrest people" too. Many have argued this is some form of obstruction/aiding, too, for the same underlying reasons.
1
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If all he's doing is posting publicly-available information? No.
Otherwise it would also be illegal to notify the public when a cop is shooting radar or where a DWI checkpoint is.
Very different. Unless at the time people were throwing cinder blocks and commercial fireworks at cops shooting radar or DWI checkpoints. But they don't do that, do they? Context is important. Context is the difference between murder and self defense.
quote:
Or to AVOID LEO, etc.
Now if he says "ICE IS AT 7TH AND MAIN GO GET EM!" clearly that is a different scenario entirely and a different discussion. That's the "added layers" I referenced above.
OK, but if I read through his postings in detail (which I have not done yet, and I think most have been taken down?), I would be surprised if anyone got the impression he was posting this to help people avoid getting caught up in a police action.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Many have argued this is some form of obstruction/aiding, too, for the same underlying reasons.
The old "many have".... weak. Anyone in this thread said that?
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:40 am to MidWestGuy
quote:
The old "many have".... weak.
Just ignore the guy at this point.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just ignore the guy at this point.
Everyone has to get a whack on him and it ties up the thread yugely.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:46 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Was this ever confirmed? I’d be curious to know where this was issued.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:50 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
He's done.
My question is how come whites rally to the cause of interests that directly negatively go against our own people.
My question is how come whites rally to the cause of interests that directly negatively go against our own people.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:51 am to TigerRoyale
quote:
My question is how come whites rally to the cause of interests that directly negatively go against our own people.
Its usually rich kids who dont need to work and have jewish ethnecity.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:07 am to NC_Tigah
From AI:
Yes, illegal for a felon to use a police scanner, but also from above, may be illegal to even divulge/publish that info. And I suppose, since it was not legal for him to use a scanner, it was also illegal for him to divulge it. He should be in a lot of trouble.
Back in the days of analog mobile phones, people in the lab would tune into the mobile bands, and you could listen in on conversations, just like tuning in on an AM/FM radio (if you knew what you were doing). Of course this was discouraged, but we were told that listening was legal, but repeating or using any info you heard was illegal.
quote:
Generally legal to listen to unencrypted police scanner broadcasts.
Illegal to intercept encrypted communications.
Illegal to use scanner information to facilitate criminal activity.
Divulging or publishing intercepted communications may have legal consequences.
Check local and state laws for further restrictions, especially regarding use while driving.
It is important to note that the legality of listening to police scanners can be a complex issue, and it's always best to consult with legal counsel if you have any questions or concerns.
quote:
He's a recently convicted felon on probation, using a police scanner (illegal)
Yes, illegal for a felon to use a police scanner, but also from above, may be illegal to even divulge/publish that info. And I suppose, since it was not legal for him to use a scanner, it was also illegal for him to divulge it. He should be in a lot of trouble.
Back in the days of analog mobile phones, people in the lab would tune into the mobile bands, and you could listen in on conversations, just like tuning in on an AM/FM radio (if you knew what you were doing). Of course this was discouraged, but we were told that listening was legal, but repeating or using any info you heard was illegal.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just ignore the guy at this point.
a few observations about this cat:
if he is an attorney, probably works for the aclu
he needs a boyfriend
he needs to upgrade that 2007 camry
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You are getting absolutely bodied in here. lmao
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:55 am to Dissident Aggressor
quote:
he needs a boyfriend
I think he's got a girl now, and has adopted her bat shite beliefs regarding the right
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:08 pm to Figgy
Needs to be sent to Bloody Beaumont and share a cell with the black gorilla family.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:17 pm to MidWestGuy
quote:
Very different. Unless at the time people were throwing cinder blocks and commercial fireworks at cops shooting radar or DWI checkpoints. B
Again, you're adding layers that aren't directly applicable to my comments.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:18 pm to MidWestGuy
quote:
The old "many have".... weak. Anyone in this thread said that?
A few
One direct example
quote:
18 USC 371. Conspiracy to obstruct justice. You may wish to read it.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:19 pm to Dissident Aggressor
quote:
if he is an attorney, probably works for the aclu
he needs a boyfriend
he needs to upgrade that 2007 camry
1/4
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:19 pm to MSCGA
quote:
ou are getting absolutely bodied in here. lmao
Not quite, but the DKE is in full effect with these comments
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just ignore the guy at this point
I agree. Why anyone still engages with her, I don’t understand. Her takes are horrible. She either has to be a shite lawyer, or a retarded bot.
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:38 pm to Konkey Dong
quote:
She either has to be a shite lawyer, or a retarded bot.
SFP falls into his own traps most of the time, and doesnt realize it.
Its his autism. Hes a smart guy, but has no common sense nor does he have any inner guidance and the ability to self reflect.
Lack of intuition seems to be the problem.
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I spouted off legal opinions about a very small slice of the pie.
Those were also intentionally framed to keep that slice small.
Nothing wrong with that.
Spoken like the true narcissist that you are!!
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News