Started By
Message

re: Judge Boasberg now wants Cabinet Level Privileged Information- 3/20/25

Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:48 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Your ignorance of the law does not mean anything about republicans. It just means you’re ignorant.


This thread is solid eveidence yall don’t know or care about the law.

you'll accept any explanation handed to you by Trump
and his goons.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84426 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:49 pm to
Eveidence abounds!
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Not privileged documents you dumb frick. Where did you go to law school?


read the next paragraph in my post. It’s literally about privilege.


Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56847 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

This thread is solid eveidence yall don’t know or care about the law.


explain to me how the court overcomes the privilege you dumb frick. Then lecture me about the law.


Again. Where did you go to law school?
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
17926 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:49 pm to
Your panties. You should grab them.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56847 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

read the next paragraph in my post. It’s literally about privilege.


Your inability to understand the privilege doesn’t change it. You dumb frick. Again. Where did you go to law school?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Your panties. You should grab them


trump has yours stuffed in your
mouth you laptop bitch
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 8:51 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56847 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:51 pm to
You’re concentrating on the wrong fricking privilege. Holy shite. You dumb fricking idiot.

For a fourth time. Where did you go to law school?
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 8:52 pm
Posted by Zachary
Member since Jan 2007
1832 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:52 pm to
What on earth, exactly, is Item 1 ordering?
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
10942 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Your inability to understand the privilege doesn’t change it. You dumb frick. Again. Where did you go to law school?


Sammy thinks just because the traffic court judge says give the privileged documents that the President has to give them over.

He was also wrong about the conflict of interest with the daughter.

Just a terrible showing all around.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Your inability to understand the privilege doesn’t change it. You dumb frick. Again. Where did you go to law school?


LSU

And at LSU I read United State v. Reynolds. Which says states:

quote:

Nevertheless, the principles which control the application of the privilege emerge quite clearly from the available precedents. The privilege belongs to the Government, and must be asserted by it; it can neither be claimed nor waived by a private party. It is not to be lightly invoked. There must be formal claim of privilege, lodged by the head of the department which has control over the matter, after actual personal consideration by that officer. The court itself must determine whether the circumstances are appropriate for the claim of privilege, and yet do so without forcing a disclosure of the very thing the privilege is designed to protect.


You can’t just say “state secret”

So far the judge has ordered trump procure the information or make a formal declaration of State Secret Priviledge and Trump has done neither.

Suck my dick you mental midget.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 8:59 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

You’re concentrating on the wrong fricking privilege. Holy shite. You dumb fricking idiot.


no I am not.


for the record the DOJ lawyers are bringing up state secret privilege. They just aren’t formally invoking it in a way the judge can actually evaluate.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 9:03 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Sammy thinks just because the traffic court judge says give the privileged documents that the President has to give them over.


It’s not me it’s the Supreme Court.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8199 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

It’s not me it’s the Supreme Court.


When?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78241 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:04 pm to
United States v Reynolds is all about this privilege.

so 1953
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 9:05 pm
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16420 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

are you drunk or just stupid?
quote:

No mattyer how much you sick his dick, bitch
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56847 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

You can’t just say “state secret” So far the judge has ordered trump procure the information or make a formal declaration of State Secret Priviledge and Trump has done neither.


and you think that won’t happen?

quote:

Suck my dick you mental midget.


Oh my. Is your LSU JD your final degree? How embarrassing.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 9:05 pm
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8699 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:05 pm to
Take away his security clearance and invstigate him for the FISA abuse he committed.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16420 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

trump has yours stuffed in your
mouth you laptop bitch
this dude is going to blow. Crazy melt
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33359 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

the law says you have to produce evidence in court.

No you dont

Many people have been jailed because they refused a judges order. And later the judge was found to be wrong. And yet the jailed never got their lost freedom back
quote:

An editor of the Anderson Valley Advertiser was found in civil contempt and jailed for a total of 13 days for refusing to turn over the original letter to the editor that he received from a prisoner. After a week of incarceration, Anderson tried to turn over the letter, but the judge refused to believe it was the original because it was typed and its author did not have access to a typewriter in jail. After another week, the judge finally accepted that the typewritten letter was the original.

Plus, Trump cant be put in jail by a co-equal branch of govt. In fact, the judiciary has no input in the impeachment process
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram