- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Brennan not a target of prosecutors in John Durham investigation: Report
Posted on 8/9/20 at 10:44 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 8/9/20 at 10:44 am to cajunangelle
quote:
He should go under the prison of of Alcatraz re-opened---- just for writing a book titled: "MY FIGHT AGAINST AMERICA'S ENEMIES: Home and Abroad."
Yep. He was director of the CIA. The very title of his book could be seen as a confession to a crime. The CIA isn't intended to do any "fighting" in the US.
0
Posted on 8/9/20 at 10:49 am to tankyank13
The NPR article links to ABC news LINK That says some prog filth think-tank wrote Barr and warned him about releasing anything so close to an election. (Obstruction) It also sounds very nervous and points to Clinesmith as a fall guy, as if they are saying, 'get him leave the others alone.'
It links to ABC news where the head honcho is/was Susan Rice's husband Ian Cameron.
I hope Durham raids all of their homes soon. This is sickening much less the media being in the tank for the Obama admin.
It links to ABC news where the head honcho is/was Susan Rice's husband Ian Cameron.
I hope Durham raids all of their homes soon. This is sickening much less the media being in the tank for the Obama admin.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 10:56 am to 2 Jugs
Some of y'all frickers are borderline delusional, and you couldn't be objective if your lives depended on it.
In no world can a die-hard q person bitch about anonymous sources or the fact that there isn't enough information available to support the position of the anonymous source.
It is just hypocritical.
In no world can a die-hard q person bitch about anonymous sources or the fact that there isn't enough information available to support the position of the anonymous source.
It is just hypocritical.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 10:58 am to cajunangelle
Rand Paul: Deep state protected John Brennan's security clearance....
quote:
Sen. Rand Paul suspects someone revoked President Trump's order to have former CIA Director John Brennan's security clearance revoked.
The president announced in August that Brennan's security clearance was being stripped due to "erratic behavior" that disqualified him from having access to sensitive information. But the White House never followed through with the complicated bureaucratic process of revocation, a source told the New York Times in a report published last month.
Asked to comment about it in an interview on CNN, Paul said the "deep state," in which federal or military officials defy a democratically elected government, was likely to blame.
"Now the deep state is actually protecting their own and not listening to the president's orders," the Kentucky Republican said on Tuesday. "I was sitting in the White House when President Trump said I want his security clearance taken, and I saw the order given. I saw the chief of staff was there, not the current chief of staff, the previous chief of staff."
He was referring to former White House chief of staff John Kelly.
"If they are working against ... the president that really does disrupt our country, does disrupt a representative democracy where the president makes a decision. If someone is countermanding that, I think we need to get to the bottom of that," Paul said.
A close ally of the president, Paul said he hopes Trump will conduct a search to find out who defied his order.
Brennan has been an outspoken critic of Trump and his tendency to question the motives of members of the U.S. intelligence community. He recently said he hopes Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel will "stand up" to Trump's "unprecedented act" of granting Attorney General William Barr "full and complete authority to declassify information" related to the origins of the federal investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Paul said he thinks Brennan has been "a partisan" and "abused his office in developing the Trump investigation. I think it was done under false pretenses and done for political reasons."
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:04 am to cajunangelle
I'm going to stick with ShipWreckedCrew on this, him and Undercover Huber are usually very very accurate on this stuff.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:05 am to cajunangelle
there's a separate investigation
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:13 am to SDVTiger
quote:
I wouldnt believe any of this shite
Durham's camp hasnt said a word
Amen to that. Irregardless of what ends up happening and to whom, there's just absolutely no rational or logical reason to deem as credible/factual anything stemming from an NBC type particularly when "lawyer close to the situation" anonymous sources are cited. We should all know this by now.
But unfortunately MSM knows full well that even in spite of our outward spurning of anonymous sources, we somehow STILL want to believe what we know is bullshite. I mean, has MSM suddenly started being honest and genuine and factual and fair with us....again, particular in the endless anonymous sources situations?? Nah, they know what they're doing and it works.....sowing seeds of doubt and causing people to question the administration. The oldest trick in the book.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:15 am to TSLG
quote:
In no world can a die-hard q person bitch about anonymous sources or the fact that there isn't enough information available to support the position of the anonymous source
Youre right. That would be hypocritical to do. But what a die-hard Q supporter could do is simply say, "I don't believe NPR's anonymous sources, because my anonymous sources say otherwise." No hypocrisy.
NPR, ABC, et al are a part of the fake news media. They aren't to be trusted, no matter what fricking source they throw out. To deny this is is simply ridiculous.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:16 am to cajunangelle
Shocked, but not shocked. 
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:18 am to TSLG
quote:Agreed, diehard QAnon people cannot be objective and they attack & are arrogant in their enlightenment over others. This is obvious on this board, like it or not.
Some of y'all frickers are borderline delusional, and you couldn't be objective if your lives depended on it.
In no world can a die-hard q person bitch about anonymous sources or the fact that there isn't enough information available to support the position of the anonymous source.
It is just hypocritical.
But trusting NPR and ABC news is the equivalent of trusting some anonymous puzzles on the chans & 8kun.
So I don't know who or what to believe.
Brennan is a vile POS is all I know for sure.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:19 am to davyjones
quote:
Amen to that. Irregardless of what ends up happening and to whom, there's just absolutely no rational or logical reason to deem as credible/factual anything stemming from an NBC type particularly when "lawyer close to the situation" anonymous sources are cited. We should all know this by now.
100%. Especially considering Brennan is a damn employee of theirs. He has been on their airwaves slandering this President throughout the entire process. NBC or whoever, has a vested interest in Brennan being absolved of any wrong doing and their chips are all in anyways. They're of course going to deny this all the way til the end. We all know this already. They'll deny it even as the cuffs are being slapped on.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:20 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Agreed, diehard QAnon people cannot be objective and they attack &
You have no room to call people out for attacking others. Here you go not making any sense again.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:20 am to BoarEd
quote:
are being slapped on
17 letters
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:22 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
17 letters
The best 17 letters.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:25 am to Uncle Stu
quote:Logic prevails that this is where we are at.
I am of course hoping for more than a report though-I WANT TELEVISED ARRESTS @ GUNPOINT of COMEY FIRST, BRENNAN SECOND- and am no more or less enlightened than any one else here.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:25 am to BoarEd
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:35 am to tankyank13
quote:
a lawyer familiar with the situation told NPR
uh...
LOL
CNN's method of "sources tell us"
versus saying "lawyers told us. John is not part of the investigation"...
neither is good...or ethical...
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:55 am to cajunangelle
quote:
a lawyer familiar with the situation told NPR that the Obama-era CIA director has been told he is not a target of prosecutors.
I'm not sure I believe some sleazy "source"
But
It wouldn't surprise me if nothing happened to him.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 11:59 am to TSLG
quote:
Some of y'all frickers are borderline delusional, and you couldn't be objective if your lives depended on it.
If you were an honest person, you would've said this while standing in front of a mirror.
What's really disgusting, and even bizarre, is a small group of people here who have a maniacal obsession with proving the Q phenomenon to be a LARP or a hoax, and all "Q-tards" who fell for it to be the dumbest, most naive people on the planet. An obsession so strong that you would seemingly rather prove Q to be fake even if it ultimately means justice denied for all the gypsies, tramps, and thieves who were in bed with Obama and Clinton.
That's what's truly disgusting.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:01 pm to cajunangelle
Nothing will happen to anyone. Justice is dead in this country.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News