- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Brennan not a target of prosecutors in John Durham investigation: Report
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:02 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:02 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
NBC News
quote:
a lawyer familiar with the situation
quote:
NPR
Okie dokie
0
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:04 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Agreed, diehard QAnon people cannot be objective and they attack &
You have no room to call people out for attacking others. Here you go not making any sense again.
Don't worry, bro. Granny Boom-Boom will kiss and make up with you in her next email.
That's how she rolls.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:11 pm to KCT
quote:
Granny Boom-Boom will kiss and make up with you in her next email.
You need to let that shite go, man.
I don't email with CA. I think she's a bitch. Although I did tell her that if I get booted off here again I would consider corresponding via email.
My only agenda here is to do my part to help expose these criminals in our Government man. That's it. I don't give a damn about all the message board drama. I'll argue with someone in one thread, maybe even fling some barbs, but I wipe the slate clean with each new thread, bro. I can recommend folks take the same approach because it helps cut down on all the senseless shite like chasing folks around from thread to thread being a disruption to the entire board.
Even though I don't like CA I do recognize that she is a good researcher and seems to want to expose the same people we want to expose. So I wouldn't let my personal beef from this board affect any potential research collaboration I did outside this board in the event I'm no longer allowed to post here for whatever reason.
I call it at least attempting to approach all of this with a "professional" attitude.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:22 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I don't email with CA. I think she's a bitch
Good for you, but I caught her trying to give you her email late one night. She's played that game with probably 50 posters here.
Obtw, I've offered to "bury the hatchet" with her a few times. She actually agreed twice, but then promptly went back on her word. I can't prove that, but it's true. The biggest difference between she and I is that I can both dish it out and take it, while she can only dish it out.
Obtw, my Momma raised me to give credit where credit is due. You've been bringing some good stuff to the board lately. Keep it up. Two suggestions - 1) don't back down just to be agreeable with someone, and 2) if somebody disagrees strongly, just let it roll off like water on a duck's back.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:27 pm to KCT
quote:
Good for you, but I caught her trying to give you her email late one night. She's played that game with probably 50 posters here.
I upvoted your post, but in regards to the above, I have to wonder, "so the frick what?" We are all presumably adults around here. How is exchanging someone's email (which was quickly redacted from an anchored thread) any different than users exchanging their Twitter handles? It's no different at all.
I don't see why it's such a big deal to you.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:31 pm to BoarEd
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:33 pm to cajunangelle
Got it.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:33 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I upvoted your post, but in regards to the above, I have to wonder, "so the frick what?" We are all presumably adults around here. How is exchanging someone's email (which was quickly redacted from an anchored thread) any different than users exchanging their Twitter handles? It's no different at all.
I don't see why it's such a big deal to you.
It's not a big deal to me. I've simply noticed it, and with all due respect I have a lot more experience with her than you do. No, it's not the same as exchanging information regarding another public forum. Imo, there's a stalking component attached to it. At least, I've never noticed another poster who does that even close to the extent she does.
We will just have to agree to disagree on whether or not it's strange.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:34 pm to KCT
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:35 pm to BoarEd
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:36 pm to BoarEd
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:36 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I also realize if he was in Durham legal trouble there would be a media go fund me push; and you would think the spawn of satan POS Brennan would have a right (and common sense) to remain silent...
My dear:
THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT. He doesn't know ANYTHING! He doesn't know if he is fricked ....or if he is in the clear.
He will find out along with the rest of us.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:37 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I just added you to the conspiracy & Q club of 17
Well, he's done for now. Boy will be lucky if he ever sees another Arkansas football game again. Then again, the way Arkansas has been playing maybe it's all for the better.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:37 pm to claremontrich
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:38 pm to cajunangelle
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:39 pm to cajunangelle
If Brennan isn't indicted I think we can all agree the Swamp uniparty is alive and well.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:40 pm to BoarEd
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:41 pm to cajunangelle
Mueller and the Lawfare group are the real players in this. Mueller provided cover while the cabal did work. Brennan, Clapper, Comey, others were their tools . . . willing tool, yes . . . but tools nonetheless. You might also say that a number of Trump appointees were either wittingly or unwittingly in on the act. I hope their roles are well described in whatever information comes out of Durham's probe (likely not in the form of a report, but rather well placed leaks by those amicable to the cause).
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:44 pm to cajunangelle
So the same NPR source now repackaged as a new report? So this basically confirms Brennan is the source of this “info.” Given the lack of leaks from Durham orbit, I would take this with a grain of salt.
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:44 pm to KCT
quote:
Well, he's done for now. Boy will be lucky if he ever sees another Arkansas football game again. Then again, the way Arkansas has been playing maybe it's all for the better
I've always been more of a basketball fan anyways.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News