Started By
Message

re: John Brennan not a target of prosecutors in John Durham investigation: Report

Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6449 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:44 pm to
Told ya'll; prepare for disappointment.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146498 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:46 pm to
Has Brennan tweeted today after his book was tweeted?
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 1:09 pm
Posted by lsuguy84
CO
Member since Feb 2009
19573 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:47 pm to
Brennan has been awfully quiet lately. He sure did stop running his mouth.
Posted by westide
Bamala
Member since Sep 2014
2882 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:48 pm to
Isn't that what the FBI rats told Flynn right before he was charged? The evidence may may lead to Brennan being a target.
Posted by Warfox
B.R. Native (now in MA)
Member since Apr 2017
3119 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 12:56 pm to
I have difficulty understanding Brennan’s hardline stance on Russia.

1). The Obama admin was actively looking for a relations reset with Russia.
2). Trump has been quite hard on Russia; certainly harder than the Obama administration(see ‘reset’). It doesn’t add up. Yes they tried to hang Russia-collusion around Trumps neck, but there has to be more to it than that...another piece of the puzzle that would explain why he is acting like this.
Posted by stomp
Bama
Member since Nov 2014
3705 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Trump has been quite hard on Russia


Provide some examples.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:00 pm to
Best examples are him giving lethal military aid to Ukraine and securing a dramatic increase in NATO defense spending. At least, those are the first two examples that come to mind.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11804 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:04 pm to
He also tried to screw Russia out of their gas deal with Germany and he bombed the frick out of their BFF Assad
Posted by viceman
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2016
30688 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Told ya'll; prepare for disappointment.



You and Tom Fitton. When Fitton said we would disappointed with Durham investigation, I knew it was the truth.
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

But what a die-hard Q supporter could do is simply say, "I don't believe NPR's anonymous sources, because my anonymous sources say otherwise." No hypocrisy.

You're an amazing troll if you are a troll.

Barnhater alt?
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

If you were an honest person, you would've said this while standing in front of a mirror.


What's really disgusting, and even bizarre, is a small group of people here who have a maniacal obsession with proving the Q phenomenon to be a LARP or a hoax, and all "Q-tards" who fell for it to be the dumbest, most naive people on the planet. An obsession so strong that you would seemingly rather prove Q to be fake even if it ultimately means justice denied for all the gypsies, tramps, and thieves who were in bed with Obama and Clinton.

That's what's truly disgusting.

I'm still a q-tard.

It's like being a saints' fan back in the day. You love them. You want them to be great. You know they've got some intriguing pieces that might go somewhere.

The difference in me and some of you guys in that scenario is that I still knew my team was shitty, I didn't trust them to win, and I could admit that there were holes throughout the positions, while you guys were trying to convince the other nfc west fans that we we're winning the super bowl.

At this stage in the game, I think it is stupid to put all your eggs in the q basket. It causes people to have a false sense of security. There is no urgency to do what it takes to get Trump elected if you think somebody else has already done it.

ETA:

quote:

Anonymous sources are okay... this time. That's what I'm hearing.


I'm sorry, but if you can't see the ridiculousness of this sarcastic statement coming from vox, nothing can help you.
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 3:28 pm
Posted by obdobd918
Member since Jun 2020
3228 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

How in the living hell did was this guy ever get placed into a government position


He was placed there by a fellow communist.
Posted by TS1926
Alabama
Member since Jan 2020
5735 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

How in the living hell did was this guy ever get placed into a government position.


Hand picked by Obama. Or was the other way around? Obama the Manchurian candidate of the CIA?
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 3:36 pm
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Agreed, diehard QAnon people cannot be objective and they attack & are arrogant in their enlightenment over others. This is obvious on this board, like it or not.

A lot of Q people would make excellent cult members.

Q could come out and tell us it was all bullshite, and another person could start posting as (B)elieve, and 10%, or more, of q people would be posting in the renamed B thread that Q was just hijacked by the deepstate.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98453 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Wasn't Gen Flynn told the same thing?


So was Trump
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

You're an amazing troll if you are a troll.



I don't know why you call me a troll for saying that. I conceded that you were correct, but then countered your basic logic with logic of my own. Do you have something to say to advance our conversation, or are you simply going to sling insults?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Anonymous sources are okay... this time. That's what I'm hearing.



I'm sorry, but if you can't see the ridiculousness of this sarcastic statement coming from vox, nothing can help you.




I don't mind you taking a shot at me, but at least quote things I've actually said.
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

the Obama-era CIA director has been told he is not a target of prosecutors.


PLEASE let them do to Brennan what they did to Flynn... lie to his arse, fully intending to prosecute him.
This post was edited on 8/9/20 at 3:45 pm
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Trump has been quite hard on Russia



Provide some examples.


You aren't still holding out hope for Trump/Russia being real, are you? By now, that's like being a member of the flat Earth crowd.
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 8/9/20 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

But what a die-hard Q supporter could do is simply say, "I don't believe NPR's anonymous sources, because my anonymous sources say otherwise." No hypocrisy.

You don't see the hypocrisy with your example? You discredited an opposing anonymous source, which is like saying anonymous sources are bullshite, with your own anonymous source and nothing more.

After reading it a couple more times, I can kind of see where you were trying to go, but it just didn't work in my eyes.

quote:

are you simply going to sling insults?

I still think I could be slinging compliments.

Regardless, I've always liked you. Besides those times when you'd slide the q thread pages with semantical back and forth, I've always thought you were a good poster.

At least you spend some time to try to bring information here. It's more than I can say for myself.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram